Ikke korrekturlæst

Anastasia Battle: Hej, velkommen alle sammen. Dette er International Peace Coalition; det er det 121. møde, vi har holdt i træk. Tak til alle, der har deltaget i denne proces gennem de sidste 121 uger, samt til nye mennesker, der er med for første gang. Og jeg vil især opfordre jer, hvis I er nye, til at præsentere jer selv under diskussionsrunden: Fortæl hvor I kommer fra, om I er knyttet til nogen organisationer, og hvilke ideer eller initiativer I arbejder på sammen med andre, eller som I går og tænker over.

Jeg hedder Anastasia Battle; jeg er jeres ordstyrer i dag sammen med Dennis Small, og jeg kan godt lide at minde folk om, hvorfor vi skabte dette forum for 121 uger siden: at forene fredsbevægelsen verden over omkring den højere forestilling, at uanset hvilket land du kommer fra, hvilket sprog du taler, eller hvilken filosofi du tænker ud fra, så kan vi gå sammen om at skabe sand fred. Og der er mange fjender i verden, som ønsker at forhindre, at mennesker med forskellige synspunkter mødes og skaber dette sande fredsbegreb. Så vi byder alle velkommen, der har denne idé, og vi opfordrer til, at diskussionsprocessen fortsætter uafbrudt.

Jer i publikum, der følger med—uanset om I er på Zoom eller på onlineplatforme—del gerne denne invitation med jeres venner, jeres organisationer og også med rimelige “modstandere”, som I mener kan tage del i denne samtale i dag og deltage under mødet.

Og for at starte os af har vi Helga Zepp-LaRouche, grundlægger af Schiller Instituttet og initiativtager til International Peace Coalition. Værsgo, Helga.

Helga Zepp-LaRouche: Hej til jer alle. Jeg tror, vi befinder os på et tidspunkt i historien, hvor menneskehedens moralske egnethed bliver sat på prøve. En tydelig manifestation af det er, hvad udfaldet bliver af den nuværende FN’s Generalforsamling, som er i fuld gang. Vi har nu formentlig allerede afsluttet (jeg ved det ikke) premierminister Netanyahus tale i FN’s Generalforsamling. Og passende nok er der mange, mange—og vil der være mange, mange—møder på sidelinjen, hvor Den Arabiske Liga og Organisationen for Islamisk Samarbejde mødes, tydeligvis for at finde en måde at gribe situationen i Gaza an på, så det faktisk kan lykkes at få standset de igangværende grusomheder.

Det, som Netanyahus regering har gjort, er, at de over hele New York har sat plakater og store bannere op med “Remember October 7”—“Husk 7. oktober”. Så man kan forestille sig, hvad essensen af Netanyahus tale bliver: grundlæggende at sige, at alt dette er en berettiget reaktion på grusomhederne den 7. oktober. Men situationen på jorden i Gaza er ganske enkelt hinsides enhver beskrivelse. Jeg kan virkelig ikke længere finde ord, der er tilstrækkelige. IDF har, som alle ved, givet ordre til at evakuere Gaza City. I alt 1 million mennesker; formentlig sidder omkring 600.000 stadig fast, fordi de fleste ikke har transportmuligheder. De sulter allerede; de dør af sult. De har ingen medicinske forsyninger, de har grundlæggende intet sted at tage hen: De bliver bedt om at tage til humanitære zoner, som er overfyldte, meget små, uden mad, uden medicin, uden vand, og Gaza City bliver bombarderet ubønhørligt: Bygning efter bygning bliver bombet. Mange familier bliver begravet i murbrokkerne. Det er helt utroligt.

Tusinder flygter og aner ikke, hvor de skal gå hen. Og i alt er 11 UNRWA-skoler/shelters blevet bombet, hvor 11.000 mennesker befandt sig indenfor. Der er også beretninger om systematiske bombardementer af skoler, hospitaler, medicinske faciliteter, moskéer og telte, hvor folk bor.

Så situationen i Mellemøsten er derfor én af ubeskrivelig spænding. Og spørgsmålet er, hvad premierminister Netanyahus ærinde er—han taler ikke kun i FN, men vil tydeligvis også tale med præsident Trump. Og nogle mistænker, at han vil sikre den endelige godkendelse til et nyt angreb på Iran.
Den amerikanske militærekspert oberst Douglas Macgregor mener grundlæggende, at en ny krig i Mellemøsten er uundgåelig, og han har følgende argumenter, som jeg kort vil henvise til, fordi de er værd at reflektere over. Han siger, at USA har lukket de to mest sårbare amerikanske baser i Irak—åbenlyst fordi de ville være mål ved et iransk angreb; og at Netanyahus mulighedsvindue er nu, men lukker hurtigt, fordi han nu ved, at han har total opbakning fra Det Hvide Hus, Kongressen og efterretningstjenesterne; og at stemningen i den amerikanske befolkning skifter hurtigt. Støtten til det, israelerne gør i Gaza, falder hastigt; der udvikler sig en anti-israelsk stemning i kølvandet på attentatet mod Charlie Kirk, hvor langt flere mennesker mener, at der på en eller anden måde var israelsk involvering. Så han mener, faren er nu, fordi konstellationen i Mellemøsten også i stigende grad skifter til Netanyahus ugunst: Iran får tydeligvis mere militær og anden støtte fra Rusland og Kina; og mødet mellem Den Arabiske Liga og OIC efter det israelske angreb på Qatar betyder, at der i det mindste til en vis grad er større beslutsomhed blandt de arabiske og islamiske lande om at handle og ikke tillade indtrængen på Qatars suveræne territorium længere—og selvfølgelig det, der foregår i Gaza.

Derfor er situationen ekstremt farlig lige nu. Og jeg mener, alt vil afhænge af, om statsoverhoveder og andre ledende kræfter, der er repræsenteret i FN’s Generalforsamling—som er en unik mulighed for at træffe beslutninger, fordi ledere fra alle disse lande kan tale sammen i en densitet, der sjældent findes andre steder—om de vil nå frem til at gøre noget meningsfuldt.

Indtil videre er Uniting for Peace-resolution 377 endnu ikke blevet bragt på bane, så det er uklart, hvad der vil ske. Senere i dag tror jeg, at Pakistan og Kina taler; jeg mener, præsident Xi har sendt en videohilsen. I morgen taler Ruslands udenrigsminister Lavrov. Og selvfølgelig vil vi ved udgangen af denne uge og ind i næste vide, hvad FN og verdenssamfundet er i stand til—eller ikke er i stand til.

Den anden store krisesituation, som også er ved at løbe af sporet og nærmer sig et afgørende punkt i en ikke alt for fjern fremtid, er naturligvis situationen i Ukraine.

Mainstream-medierne på begge sider af Atlanten ville fortolke præsident Trumps opslag på Truth Social—grundlæggende at Ukraine vinder, at Ukraine kan vinde hele Ukraines territorium tilbage, hvis europæerne støtter det—som et 100% kursskifte fra Trump: at han er blevet overbevist af europæisk diplomati om, at Rusland er skurken, og at han må støtte Ukraine.

Men så enkelt er det ikke. Der var en drøftelse mellem Rubio og Lavrov, som Maria Zakharova karakteriserede som meget produktiv, altomfattende og i tråd med Alaska-drøftelserne. Hun afviste grundlæggende Trumps tweet som taktisk, sigtende mod at påvirke hans forhandlingsposition, men at Trump i bund og grund ikke har ændret sig.

Det tweet har selvfølgelig en masse implikationer. Den mere sandsynlige tolkning er, at Trump ønsker at slippe af med Ukraine-problemet. Macgregor og andre siger grundlæggende, at Trump har abdiceret NATO’s lederskab, at han vil overlade hele Ukraine-rodet til europæerne. Det kan være Trumps motivation, men kan europæerne udfylde vakuummet, hvis USA faktisk stopper sin involvering? Jeg mener, at trods et utroligt oprustningsræs og milliarder på milliarder, der spildes på nytteløse våbenprogrammer, kan størrelsen på de europæiske hære kun karakteriseres som Lilliput-hære, hære af “Chiva wars” [ph], og på ingen måde i stand til at besejre Rusland eller endda hjælpe Ukraine til sejr på slagmarken—uanset hvor mange våbensystemer man sender—fordi den overordnede situation er, at ukrainerne taber, hvis de ikke allerede har tabt krigen, simpelthen pga. mangel på mandskab. Rusland har netop udsendt en indkaldelse af unge i alderen 18–25, hvilket betyder en enorm tilførsel af nye, friske tropper—som naturligvis først skal trænes—men ikke desto mindre er det noget, Ukraine med en meget mindre befolkning og allerede 1,7 millioner tab, af forskellige typer af krigsskader, ikke kan matche. Det er derfor en håbløs situation.

The Economist siger korrekt, at det er en fantasi—kalder det en fantasi—at ukrainerne kan generobre hele territoriet. Men at Ukraine vil være i en “too big to fail”-position, og derfor må Europa træde til. De er stadig på linjen med, at der må sendes tropper, og at der skal etableres en flyveforbudszone over Ukraine—hvilket er en sikker opskrift på krig. Og alt dette foregår i konteksten af en bevidst optrappet hysteri over såkaldte “luftindtrængninger” af russiske droner i Polen og krænkelse af luftrummet i Estland, hvilket den russiske regering fuldstændigt afviser og benægter. De siger, intet af den slags har fundet sted; at det var en falsk flag-operation, orkestreret for at puste til krigshysteriet. De påpeger også, at NATO-fly hele tiden krænker russisk luftrum, men at Rusland ikke skyder NATO-fly ned.

Von der Leyen—og mange andre europæiske politikere—siger nu, “nedskydning af russiske kampfly er på bordet, det er en mulighed.” Dertil svarede Ruslands ambassadør i Paris, Alexey Meshkov, at “hvis det sker, betyder det krig.”

Lavrov sagde, at NATO allerede er i krig med Rusland; så det er en ekstremt anspændt situation. Men ser man på de militære realiteter på jorden, vil selv et vanvittigt oprustningsprogram ikke være tilstrækkeligt. Den tyske regering er i et vanvid—hele den tyske befolkning piskes op i krigshysteri. Der foregår nu manøvrer i Hamborg, hvor fortællingen går på, at NATO-tropper lander i Hamborg havn og derefter omlastes til tog og lastbiler for at sende våben og soldater mod østfronten. Hele befolkningen i Hamborg tvinges til at leve med støj og røg—og dermed skabes hysteri i befolkningen.

Merz-regeringen, bistået af koalitionspartneren Klingbeil fra Socialdemokraterne samt SPD’s forsvarsminister Pistorius osv., siger nu, at den urimelige og ufinansierbare velfærdsstat skal afvikles, og at der nu skal være det største oprustningsprogram, fordi Bundeswehr skal være Europas stærkeste hær. Hvad det vil sige? De planlægger nu 153 militærprojekter: en lang, lang liste af våbenkategorier offentliggøres, og de vil bruge 83 mia. euro på det, og forskellige parlamentsudvalg skal afslutte og stemme om det i næste år—grundlæggende mellem nu og udgangen af december 2026—til kampvogne, opklaringskøretøjer, haubitser, Eurofighters—grundlæggende alle disse konventionelle våbensystemer, som, hvis det ender i krig og meget hurtigt krydser den nukleare tærskel mod verdens største atommagt—nemlig Rusland—vil blive pulveriseret i løbet af kort tid. Man kan ikke vinde en krig, hvis den når atomtærsklen, mod den største atomvåbenmagt på planeten.

Det disse mennesker gør, er at piske befolkningen op i krigshysteri, foreslå at afvikle velfærdsstaten; den tyske økonomi er i frit fald, hvilket ikke vil blive stoppet ved at omdirigere de få tilbageværende aktiver til militær produktion, for militær produktion er en total destruktion af fysiske aktiver. Men det vil massivt øge fattigdommen, ødelægge en stor del af det tyske Mittelstand og blive en katastrofe.

Vi må derfor gøre alt, hvad vi kan, for at få befolkningen og institutionelle kræfter væk fra denne idé, for det er selvmord. Det er en vej til Europas undergang, og de politikere, der foreslår det, må stilles til ansvar, fordi det er en ikke-vindbar strategi—fuldstændigt uansvarlig. Situationen er sådan, at vi må mobilisere alle kræfter for at stoppe denne krig: Jeg vil bruge dette IPC-møde til at opfordre alle deltagere, både i Tyskland og internationalt, til at støtte de kommende store demonstrationer i Berlin og Stuttgart den 3. oktober. I alt 400 organisationer har allerede indkaldt til demonstrationer den dag—det er dagen for den tyske genforening, en helligdag. Tag til demonstrationerne i Berlin og Stuttgart, mobilisér alle jeres venner, for det er Tysklands eksistens, der er på spil. Og kun hvis befolkningen i store masser viser deres vilje til at overleve, kan regeringens politik påvirkes, før det er for sent.
Det er et meget vigtigt skridt, men ikke afslutningen på, hvad vi bør gøre: For det at være imod krigen er meget, meget vigtigt! Den tyske befolknings apati må ændres og erstattes af en mobilisering, mindst lige så stærk som i begyndelsen af 1980’erne under mellemdistancemissil-krisen, hvor hundrede tusinder bogstaveligt talt var på gaden. I London har der allerede været hundredtusinder på gaden; Paris er lige nu lammet af generalstrejker og store demonstrationer. Men det, vi har brug for i Tyskland, er netop hundrede tusinder—hvis ikke én eller to millioner—på gaden for at trænge budskabet igennem.

Det er ikke nok, for vi må vise en vej ud—et alternativ til idéen om, at man skal i krig mod Rusland og snart mod Kina. Den egentlige grund til hysteriet er, at kræfterne i det gamle system—det vestlige neoliberale system—er fuldstændig skræmte over Global Syds fremvækst. Jeg deltog netop i et meget vigtigt og smukt møde i Beijing: Beijing Cultural Forum, hvor mange lande—jeg tror 40 lande eller flere—var repræsenteret, og der var et stort program om civilisationernes dialog og forskellige former for kultur. Alle deltagerne—fra Afrika, Latinamerika og Asien—var involveret i smukke drøftelser, i en fuldstændig optimistisk ånd, og ingen er imod, at Vesten deltager! Det bekræftede for mig, at hvis de vestlige lande blot ville beslutte at stoppe denne geopolitiske kolde krigs-mentalitet og respondere på Global Syd-landenes ambition om at overvinde kolonialismen og blive normalt industrialiserede, udviklede lande—med hjælp fra BRICS, Shanghai-samarbejdet og andre institutioner i Global Syd—så ville Vesten blive modtaget med åbne arme, og alle problemer på planeten—inklusive Mellemøsten, inklusive Ukraine og ethvert andet problem—kunne løses gennem dialog og samarbejde.

Vi må overbevise og oplyse folk i det Globale Vest/Globalt Nord om, at den mulighed eksisterer og er tilgængelig, og vi må skabe et skifte i Europas og USA’s orientering i den retning.

Det er, hvad jeg vil sige her i begyndelsen. Jeg mener, vi er ved et brudpunkt i historien, og jeg opfordrer jer alle til at gøre alt, hvad vi kan, i samarbejde, for at føre menneskeheden ind i et nyt tankens paradigme, hvor vi sætter den ene menneskehed først og nationale interesser i overensstemmelse med den ene menneskeheds interesse.

Afsluttende bemærkninger
Der blev berørt mange vigtige punkter, men jeg vil begynde med en fare, som jeg mener ikke er blevet fuldt ud nævnt i dag, nemlig: Vi står virkelig over for faren for en ny fascisme, som har alle de gamle fascismers kendetegn—men med et ekstra træk, nemlig at der gennem teknologiudviklingen nu er en utrolig mulighed for at manipulere den offentlige debat og den offentlige viden. Og grunden til, at jeg mener, tech-selskaberne sammen med præsident Trump tog til Storbritannien for at etablere sig og investere stort dér, er grundlæggende, at de ønsker at placere hele datakontrollen—i det mindste i den vestlige verden, hvor end man trækker grænsen—så de kan have total tankekontrol og fuldstændigt eliminere demokratiet. For enhver mening, der ikke flugter med narrativet—og da Dennis allerede nævnte Peter Thiel—burde alle læse Peter Thiels tekst “The Straussian Moment.”

Han indleder i det væsentlige med at sige, at med 9/11 ændrede den moderne tidsalder sig, og hvad folk troede indtil da—at man ikke kan have sikkerhed uden frihed—det grundlæggende princip må ændres, så man efter 9/11 må have mindre frihed, hvis man vil have sikkerhed. Og jeg mener, at det er det, der foregår nu: fascismens nye ansigt som total datakontrol og manipulations-evne. Husk, at det sidste militære angreb på Iran byggede på software fra Palantir, som leverede forkerte data om Irans såkaldte fremskridt i udviklingen af atomvåben—data, som IAEA, Det Internationale Atomenergiagentur, adopterede. Og på det grundlag—at Iran var ved at få atomvåben—blev militære angreb retfærdiggjort i medierne. Og fem dage senere sagde IAEA: “Åh, undskyld! Dataene var forkerte,” men skaden var allerede sket.

Så man kunne ved et hårs bredde udløse enhver form for krig—inklusive en atomkrig—baseret på sådanne manipulationer. Og der findes for nuværende ingen effektiv kontrol.

Derfor mener jeg, at et af de meget presserende spørgsmål som led i en ny international sikkerheds- og udviklingsarkitektur—som jeg stadig insisterer på er den eneste måde at komme ud af denne dødelige fare—må være en ny aftale mellem nationer om, hvordan man håndterer AI. For i dag kan man få mennesker til at “tale” med deres egen stemme tekster, de aldrig har rørt ved; man kan få det til at se ud, som om de siger eller gør ting. Jeg så for nogle dage siden en reklame, hvor visse tyske ministre reklamerede for et produkt—jeg tænkte: “Hvad er det?!” Det var naturligvis en AI-manipulation, og videoen forsvandt kort efter fra internettet, fordi den var falsk.

Men hele dette område—selvom AI kan have ekstremt positive anvendelser, som fx i Kina, hvor man er langt foran Vesten i brugen: ansigtsgenkendelse, medier, datatransmission i alle dele af samfundet—det er meget effektivt, og ingen protesterer, fordi folk har tillid til regeringen og mener, at dette gøres for det fælles bedste. Når det er sagt, handler det ikke om at stoppe AI—man kan ikke stoppe nogen teknologi. Teknologisk fremskridt er en del af menneskets natur og universets lovmæssighed. Men om teknologien bruges til gode eller onde formål afhænger fuldstændigt af intentionen hos det menneske, der bruger den.

Og jeg mener, faren for en ny fascistisk kontrol ved brug af disse teknologier kræver vores meget seriøse opmærksomhed.

Det bringer mig til Ilkos spørgsmål. Først må jeg lykønske dig: Det er første gang, jeg har set dine malerier, og jeg synes, de er utrolig gode! Jeg mener, du har mestret hemmeligheden ved sjælens indre bevægelser og har formået at udtrykke dem fantastisk i malerier. Og jeg er fuldstændig enig i, at det kun vil lykkes at genetablere den menneskelige identitet på basis af de bedste klassiske traditioner—i musik, maleri, poesi. Vi må virkelig gøre en indsats. For den eneste måde, man gør mennesker modstandsdygtige mod manipulation fra disse datagiganter, er ved at gøre dem indre frie! Derfor blev Schiller Instituttet opkaldt efter Friedrich Schiller, for han var som ingen anden optaget af at frigøre den indre frihed i hvert menneske. Og det kan kun ske—ifølge Schiller, og det er jeg helt enig i—gennem den æstetiske opdragelse, ved at gøre mennesker bevidste om den egentlige skaberkraftens gnist, som man kan lære at kende ved at beskæftige sig med store eksempler på klassisk kunst.

Vi må derfor have langt mere fokus på Civilisationernes Dialog. Og jeg kan kun sige, at det er meget svært at kommunikere det, fordi—jeg var, som nævnt, lige i Beijing til dette kulturforum, og der var mange fra Global Syd: Indien, Pakistan, naturligvis Kina; men også fra afrikanske og latinamerikanske lande, Brasilien og mange andre steder. Og de var alle fremtidsorienterede—“hvordan løser vi dialogens problemer?”, “hvordan øger vi forståelsen for samarbejde?”, “hvordan kommunikerer vi, så vi virkelig når ind i den anden kulturs og det andet menneskes dybeste sjæl?”

Og så kommer man tilbage til Tyskland, og det er som at træde ind i et andet univers igen, med de emner, vi har haft i dag: faren for atomkrig; folkemordskrisen i Gaza; oprustning. Vi lever i to parallelle universer lige nu! Det ene er Global Syd, der forsøger at skabe en ny verdensøkonomisk orden baseret på De Fem Principper for Fredelig Sameksistens, Bandung-ånden og Shanghai-ånden: et nyt paradigme mellem nationer, hvor man respekterer hinandens suverænitet og vil gøre det bedste for den anden—ikke skade den anden. Det er en helt anden verden.

Og jeg mener, den største opgave, vi har, hvis vi vil være virkelig effektive, er at oplyse mennesker i Vesten/Globalt Nord—eller hvad man vil kalde det, “det kollektive Vesten” (som ikke er så kollektivt endda)—så de forstår, at der er en anden verden under tilblivelse. Og jeg er fuldstændig sikker på, at det er nøglen, og jeg vil opfordre alle repræsentanter fra Global Syd til at tale højere. FN giver ganske vist et forum til det, men derudover: Ræk ud til folk i Tyskland, Frankrig, Italien, Skandinavien, Ungarn, USA. Lad os ikke overlade menneskehedens skæbne til oligarkerne, der forsøger at bevare den gamle orden og indføre en ny fascisme; lad os sikre, at folk-til-folk-forståelsen om, at der er et nyt økonomisk, moralsk og æstetisk system på vej, bliver kommunikeret. For jeg ved, at det er vejen ud af den nuværende ulykke.

Så endnu engang: mobilisér til den 3. oktober. I kan gøre meget. I kan skrive budskaber til det tyske folk; I kan ringe til jeres tyske kontakter verden over—hjælp os med denne mobilisering, for det, der sker i Tyskland lige nu, er måske det værste eksempel på krigshysteri, og befolkningen bliver udsat for en utrolig hjernevask fra massemedier og visse politikere.

Under alle omstændigheder befinder vi os i denne utrolige spænding, hvor det nye paradigme allerede er under opbygning, men vi må sikre, at folk i alle lande får kendskab til det.

by Marcia Merry Baker 
20. september 2025 (EIRNS) – I går, den 19. september, kl. 12, udløb den frist, som Israels forsvarsstyrker (IDF) havde sat for de belejrede indbyggere i Gaza City til at forlade byen mod syd. IDF tilbød ikke engang en foregivelse af midler til udvandringen eller en beboelig destination at nå frem til. Netanyahu-kabinetsmedlem Bezalel Smotrich sagde i en tale i sidste uge, at dette er »nedrivningsfasen« for Gaza, og at israelernes genopbygning af Gaza med henblik på et ejendomsboom vil følge. Efter middagstid i går, markerede IDF fristen ved at udsende en erklæring, der udlagde de dødbringende planer for den halve million mennesker, der stadig forblev tilbage.

IDF’s frist for rydningen af Gaza by var sat til at udløbe dagen efter den udløbsdato, som FN’s Generalforsamling sidste år fastsatte for Israel til at stoppe sin adfærd i Gazastriben og de andre besatte områder. FN’s Generalforsamling pålagde i 2024 Israel at overholde Den Internationale Domstols (ICJ) afgørelserom, at Israel skulle gøre en ende på sin drabspraksis inden 18. september 2025 . I stedet intensiverede Israel sine handlinger, så det eskalerede til folkemord, hvilket FN for nylig har anerkendt. Den 16. september offentliggjorde et team af uafhængige eksperter, udpeget af FN’s Menneskerettighedsråd, en rapport, der dokumenterer, at Israels handlinger mod palæstinenserne i Gaza »opfylder kriterierne i folkemordskonventionen«.

Gårsdagens erklæring fra IDF og udtalelser fra andre israelske myndigheder rapporterer, at omkring 480.000 palæstinensere er strømmet ud af Gaza City siden slutningen af august under elendige forhold. Der er mindst 400.000 tilbage. De vil være blandt dem i »norden« i Gazastriben, som alle meget snart vil blive anset for at høre ind under » Hamas som kollektiv«: Det vil sige, at de vil blive anset som mål for massedrab. IDF planlægger at omringe Gaza City fuldstændigt inden for en uge bortset fra kystområdet. IDF vil opbygge Netzarim-korridoren, der løber øst-vest, syd for Gaza City, som vil dele Gazastriben i to og blive brugt til at opnå Israels totale kontrol over begge sider af territoriet. Israel rapporterer bl.a. i statistikker, at 200 flerfamiliehuse i Gaza City er blevet jævnet med jorden; 180 robotter og køretøjer med sprængstoffer blev taget i brug.

Nu betragtes Israels adfærd fra enhver vinkel med rette som frafalden fra moralen, – massemord i Gaza, bombning i Den Persiske Golf samt i Levanten, Syrien, Yemen og Iran. Men Israel støttes fortsat af USA og »Extended Britain«, det vil sige Tony Blair og hans britiske netværk, der udfører deres beskidte arbejde i det store og hele.

Der er ekstraordinære fordømmelser af dette. Den israelske orkesterdirigent Ilan Volkov talte i London i sidste uge, lige fra podiet, efter en symfonikoncert i Royal Albert Hall, og sagde: »Jeg beder jer alle om at gøre alt, hvad der står i jeres magt for at stoppe denne galskab. Hver eneste lille handling tæller, mens regeringerne tøver og venter.« Siden da er han vendt tilbage til sit hjemland Israel for at protestere ved grænsen til Gaza. Han blev arresteret der i går sammen med tre andre. Han insisterede på, at »vi skal stoppe folkemordet nu.«

Det er på høje tid, at nationerne ligeledes handler bevidst og med overbevisning, hvilket betyder, at borgerne skal mobilisere deres regeringer, især i USA, til diplomati baseret på retfærdighed. Der er ikke behov for nogen »protokol« for at nationerne kan samarbejde om nødforanstaltninger. Desuden findes protokollen faktisk allerede.

I henhold til FN’s Generalforsamlings resolution 377 med titlen »Enhed for fred« (vedtaget i 1950) kan FN’s Generalforsamling godkende specifikke nødforanstaltninger. Faktisk stemte FN’s Generalforsamling i juni i år med 149 (ja) mod 12 (nej) og 19 hverken for eller imod for en række foranstaltninger, som Israel blev pålagt. I FN’s pressemeddelelse fra 12. juni står der:

Opsummerende; »Generalforsamlingen krævede i dag, at Israel, den besættende magt, øjeblikkeligt ophæver blokaden af Gaza, åbner alle grænseovergange og sikrer, at hjælpen når ud til den palæstinensiske civilbefolkning i hele Gazastriben øjeblikkeligt og i tilstrækkeligt omfang.« Denne FN-Generalforsamlingsbeslutning indeholder 20 punkter og indeholder ikke bestemmelser om håndhævelse, men protokollen og princippet er klare. Faktisk har FN’s Generalforsamling teknisk set en igangværende samling om emnet, kaldet den »Tiende Nødsærsamling«.

Mandag den 22. september skal FN’s Generalforsamling forhandle fra kl. 15 til 18 (EDT) på sin højniveau-konference om Palæstinas statsstatus. Saudi-Arabien, som sammen med Frankrig er medformand for denne session, vil være repræsenteret af kronprins og premierminister Mohammed bin Salman Al Saud via video. FN’s Generalforsamling godkendte i går hans deltagelse uden tilstedeværelse. Den palæstinensiske deltagelse vil være meget begrænset, da det amerikanske udenrigsministerium har nægtet at godkende visa til mange palæstinensere. Faktisk stemte både USA og Israel imod at tillade selv en ekstern videopræsentation af Mahmoud Abbas, der repræsenterer Den Palæstinensiske Myndighed. FN’s Generalforsamling godkendte imidlertid hans tale med 145 stemmer for og 5 imod (herunder USA og Israel samt Narou, Palau og Paraguay).

Uanset hvad der sker på mandagens FN-Generalforsamlingsmøde, er det en opfordring til handling, ikke en opfordring til at stoppe. Den franske præsident Emmanuel Macron forventes at deltage personligt i FN-Generalforsamlingens møde den 22. september. Han og kronprins Mohammed talte i telefon i dag.

Et stigende antal lande annoncerer deres intention om at anerkende en palæstinensisk stat. For eksempel forventes Portugal at annoncere dette søndag den 21. september. Det iøjnefaldende »tomrum« i dette billede er manglen på mobilisering til øjeblikkelig handling, til nødhjælp og til gennemførelsen af et program for en fuldtændig økonomisk genopbygning og udvikling af hele regionen. Den mangeårige Oase-planen, som Lyndon LaRouche fremsatte i 1975,  adresserer denne nødvendighed. »New York-erklæringen«, der er resultatet af en drøftelsesproces organiseret af Saudi-Arabien og Frankrig i juli i år og som blev vedtaget af FN’s Generalforsamling den 12. september, nævner økonomisk levedygtighed, men uden substans.

Washington svinger i øjeblikket en økonomisk nedrivningskugle i hele regionen. Det forårsager frygtelige skader, men fremmer samtidig samarbejde mellem nationer mod den geopolitiske akse London-Wall Street. I går beordrede det amerikanske udenrigsministerium, at Irans førende havn Chabahar skal  pålægges tunge sanktioner fra den 29. september, som har været undtaget siden 2018. Chabahar er det centrale intermodale knudepunkt for jernbane- og søtransport langs hovedruten i den internationale nord-syd-transportkorridor (INSTC), der betjener Indien gennem Iran til Rusland og direkte involverer Kaukasus, Centralasien og især Afghanistan. På mødet i Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) Heads of State Council den 31. august til 1. september i Tianjin, Kina, var INSTC et vigtigt emne for diskussion med henblik på udvidelse. Kun tre uger senere har USA (med Londons velsignelse) rettet sig mod INSTC’s vigtigste havn.

Det amerikanske udenrigsministerium afviste i går også ensidigt en længe ventet aftale om, at Irak skulle få leveret naturgas fra Turkmenistan ledt gennem Iran. Udenrigsministeriet erklærede dette for uacceptabelt, fordi det ville gavne Iran.

Alt i alt – ødelæggelsen af økonomier, bombningerne, den finansielle militarisering og frem for alt folkemordet i Gaza – er der mange grunde til at mobilisere som aldrig før for at stoppe alt dette. Den Internationale Fredskoalitions 120. ugentlige møde fandt netop sted fredag den 19. september. Deltag i det næste fredag den 26. september.

Deltag i og støt den politiske konference, som Schiller Instituttet arrangerer. Den næste begivenhed finder sted i Paris den 8. november 2025. Titlen på heldagsbegivenheden i Paris er »Afrika, det Globale Flertal: Sammen om frigørelse og fred«.

I invitationen til Pariskonferencen står der: »Unge mennesker fra hele verden vil komme for at forsvare deres vision for den kommende verden og deres løsninger for at opnå fred. De vil medbringe stemmerne fra Afrika, landene der hører til det globale flertal og alle andre nationer og folk, der kæmper for ægte frigørelse, fred, solidaritet og fremskridt for alle.« Planlæg at deltage, enten personligt eller på afstand. Støt konferencen.

Credit: CC/Jean-Pierre Bazard

Efter introduktionen af ordstyrer Anastasia Battle:

HELGA ZEPP-LAROUCHE: Velkommen til jer alle. Vi befinder os i en utrolig situation, hvor der sker tektoniske forandringer; vi ser sammenbruddet af den internationale orden og fremkomsten af nye strukturer, som er helt ufattelige.

Mens angrebet på Gaza City fortsætter, truer det umiddelbart livet for mellem 600.000 og 1 million palæstinensere, der drives ud i intetheden, fordi de ikke har noget sted at tage hen. Mange af dem er nu alt for svage til overhovedet at forsøge at flygte. I går blev der igen nedlagt veto af USA mod endnu en FN-resolution, der krævede øjeblikkelig våbenhvile, frigivelse af gidslerne og ubegrænset levering af humanitær hjælp. Fjorten nationer stemte for, men det er klart, at USA’s veto betyder, at den ikke bliver gennemført. Det er sjette gang siden 7. oktober 2023, at dette er sket. Den algeriske ambassadør ved FN, Bendjama, kom med en meget lidenskabelig reaktion og sagde, at Israel gør alt dette, mens hele verden ser på. Hvad er resultatet for verdenssamfundet?

Det store spørgsmål er, i betragtning af at FN’s Generalforsamling allerede er begyndt – statscheferne mødes fra mandag – om der vil være et land, der vil tage initiativ til FN-resolution 377, hvorved der kunne afholdes en afstemning, hvis beslutningsmagten blev flyttet fra FN’s Sikkerhedsråd til FN’s Generalforsamling. Man har forsøgt at finde ud af, om der er planer om at fremsætte denne resolution. Der er mange grupper, der arbejder for dette, men det store spørgsmål er, om der vil være et land, der tager føringen? Og vil der være et flertal på to tredjedele, hvis det overhovedet bliver fremsat? At dette er presserende, kan man se af, at Israel heller ikke overholdt den etårige frist, der udløb i går, hvor FN’s Generalforsamling for et år siden med et flertal på mere end to tredjedele havde stemt for, at Israel skulle afslutte besættelsen af alle palæstinensiske områder. Israel ignorerer simpelthen dette. For et par dage siden kom rapporten fra den Uafhængige Internationale Undersøgelseskommission om de Besatte Palæstinensiske Områder, hvor det fastslås, at alle krav om et igangværende folkemord og krigsforbrydelser begået af Israel er uomtvistelige. Den sydafrikanske regering udsendte en erklæring, hvor den sagde, at dette er en bekræftelse af, at de bragte sagen for Den Internationale Domstol, og at de føler sig forsinket retfærdiggjort for at have gjort det.

En af ministrene i Netanyahus regering, Smotrich, deltog i et topmøde om byfornyelse, hvor han lovede investorerne, at Gaza ville blive en rigtig ejendoms-bonanza. Han sagde, at nedrivningsfasen allerede er afsluttet, og at nedrivning er den første fase i byfornyelsen; nu kan genopbygningen begynde. Dette er naturligvis det yderste udtryk for kynisme i lyset af, at mere end 65.000 mennesker med sikkerhed har været dræbt; ifølge andre skøn er over 250.000 mennesker på den ene eller anden måde omkommet. Den israelske avis Ha’aretz skrev, at det faktum, at Smotrich nævnte, at Gaza ville blive en stor guldgrube, viser kløften mellem den officielle linje om, hvad det hele handler om – nemlig at eliminere Hamas, befri gidslerne osv. – og ambitionerne bag kulisserne, og hvad hensigten er hos dem, der begår disse forbrydelser.

Som vi har diskuteret mange gange, er det strategiske system ved at gå i opløsning. Der kunne nævnes mange aspekter, men der er sket en helt ny, stor tektonisk forandring. Det er det faktum, at premierminister Sharif fra Pakistan og kronprins Mohamed bin Salman fra Saudi-Arabien den 17. september indgik en gensidig strategisk aftale. Atommagten Pakistan er nu allieret med Saudi-Arabien og giver dem en atomparaply. Selvom dette ikke er en fuldstændig overraskelse, i betragtning af at disse to lande har haft tætte militære bånd i mange år, er det helt klart en stor ændring i situationen. For det er åbenbart, at de amerikanske allierede i regionen ikke længere føler sig sikre på grund af manglende amerikansk beskyttelse, hvilket var den konklusion, de åbenbart drog af Israels angreb på Qatar. På trods af at den største amerikanske militærbase i verden ligger i Qatar, blev der ikke gjort noget for at beskytte Qatar, som generelt betegnes som en af USA’s nærmeste allierede i regionen. Ali Larijani, den iranske sekretær for det Øverste Nationale Sikkerhedsråd, besøgte Saudi-Arabien. Det er vigtigt, fordi de forskellige lande naturligvis skal informeres om konsekvenserne af en sådan dramatisk ny ændring. I betragtning af at Kina tidligere har mæglet i forholdet mellem Iran og Saudi-Arabien, er tidligere konflikter allerede blevet afværget. Det er derfor vigtigt, at Iran er i dialog med Saudi-Arabien om dette spørgsmål. Desuden lykønskede den egyptiske udenrigsminister Abdelatty både Pakistan og Saudi-Arabien med etableringen af denne nye pagt. Og Tyrkiet og Egypten gennemførte for første gang i 13 år fælles militærøvelser. Dette skete efter en afkøling af forholdet i den periode. Desuden har Tyrkiet og Egypten begge en lignende holdning til Israels aggression, ikke kun i Gaza, men også i Syrien, hvor Tyrkiet i særdeleshed har beskyldt Israel for at forsøge at føre en ekspansionistisk politik i hele regionen.

Det betyder, at Pakistans atomare paraply nu potentielt dækker alle arabiske lande, fordi de allerede har sagt, at døren er åben; flere lande kan tilslutte sig, og det vil de sandsynligvis også gøre. Det vil betyde, at som professor Ted Postol sagde, har man to ikke-erklærede atommagterne i regionen – Israel og Iran – men nu har man også en atomparaply fra Pakistan over Saudi-Arabien og sandsynligvis snart alle de arabiske stater. Forhåbentlig vil dette bidrage til stabiliteten i regionen, men det viser virkelig den fuldstændige omgruppering, hvorved den gamle orden klart ikke længere fungerer.

Det, der sker i Gaza, har naturligvis utrolige konsekvenser andre steder. I går afholdt en gruppe advokater i Berlin, bistået af European Legal Support Center og Palestinian Institute for Public Diplomacy, en pressekonference. De fremlagde over 100 sider med anklager om medvirken og hjælp til Israel til at begå folkedrab, krigsforbrydelser osv. med henvisning til Folkedrabskonventionen og Konventionen om Krigsforbrydelser. De anklagede den tidligere kansler Scholz, Baerbock, Habeck, Merz, Pistorius, Wadephul, Reiche og direktørerne for de tyske våbenfirmaer, der leverede store våben til Israel, på trods af at disse anklager allerede var fremsat. Første gang samme advokatgruppe fremsatte sådanne anklager, blev de afvist af retten som irrelevante osv. Men jeg tror, at det kan blive anderledes denne gang, fordi der var den officielle FN-kommissionsrapport, som fastslog, at der er tale om folkemord. Og den tidligere leder af München-sikkerhedskonferencen, Heusgen, der tidligere var rådgiver for Merkel og også tidligere tysk ambassadør ved FN, havde skrevet i en artikel i Berliner Zeitung, at han mener, at dette skal tages alvorligt, og at det ville være ødelæggende, hvis Tyskland blev dømt. Jeg tror, at dette nu hænger i luften.

Der er også artikler i de alternative medier, der siger, at Merz sidder i et glashus, når han i et interview med OneTV den 2. september tre gange kaldte præsident Putin en krigsforbryder, og sagde at Putin muligvis er den værste krigsforbryder i vores tid. Og man ved, hvor stor ekspertisen er i at håndtere sådanne krigsforbrydere; at der ikke er plads til generøsitet. Så denne avis, Manova News, siger, at Merz sidder i et glashus, når han siger dette. Vi bør også være opmærksomme på, at de tyske forberedelser til en militær konfrontation med Rusland forløber med fuld fart i henhold til Operational Plan Germany, som forsøger at forberede Tyskland på at blive det centrale knudepunkt for den kommende NATO-krig med Rusland. Det sker måske ikke om 2-5 år, som de altid hævder, men i betragtning af at Peskov og andre russiske embedsmænd har sagt, at NATO allerede er i krig med Rusland, bør dette få alle til at være på tæerne og være fuldstændig oprørte, for denne fare er meget overhængende. Hvis der er disse amerikanske mellemdistancemissiler, der opstilles i begyndelsen af 2026, bliver det naturligvis en akut situation, for det er missiler med atomar kapacitet. Hvordan skulle Rusland vide, om de er udstyret med atomvåben eller ej, når de er i stand til at have sådan et våbenarsenal?

Nu må jeg desværre også kommentere præsident Trumps andet statsbesøg i Storbritannien, som ifølge Trump var utroligt. Han er den eneste statsleder, der har haft denne ære for anden gang, men set ud fra et historisk perspektiv var det en fuldstændig vederstyggelighed. Jeg bør indlede mine kommentarer med at sige, at Den amerikanske Frihedskrig blev udkæmpet mod selve ideen om adel og monarkier, og at der er mennesker, som er overlegne i forhold til andre på grund af deres slægtslinje. Tilsyneladende har præsident Trump, der ellers altid er stolt af at tale om det amerikanske system og dette og hint, glemt, hvad Den amerikanske Frihedskrig handlede om. I sin tale ved dette taffel, der var en ganske operetteagtig forestilling, sad dronning Camilla med sin lille krone, og prinsesse Kate havde også en lille krone; det lignede scenen i en operette, der slet ikke passede til det 21. århundrede. Men de sad ned. Præsident Trump sagde i sin tale, at tænkere som Hobbes, Locke, Adam Smith, Newton og nogle andre repræsenterer de højeste præstationer, som menneskeheden har frembragt i Kongeriget. Derefter sagde han, at det Britiske Imperium har opnået utrolige resultater ved at lægge grundlaget for lov, frihed og ytringsfrihed, og at kong Charles løftede de fattige, tog sig af landmændene, sårede veteraner og så videre. Nu vil jeg ikke engang kommentere det, for det Britiske Imperiums rolle i imperialismen, kolonialismen og i at anstifte mange krige er velkendt for de fleste mennesker, men tilsyneladende ikke for præsident Trump. Desværre er det en svaghed, som jeg kun kan sige er utrolig for en amerikansk præsident, at han ved 250-årsdagen for Den amerikanske Frihedskrig næste år er så uvidende om historien. Han syntes også at invitere kong Charles til et gensynsbesøg i USA. Man kan kun håbe, at der er nogle patrioter i Amerika, der kan overbevise ham om ikke at gøre det i tide.

Vi skal huske, at bag alle disse udviklinger ligger det faktum, at vi sidder på en vulkan. Årsagen til, at nogle kredse i Vesten er så fast besluttede på at begrænse og endda ødelægge den Globale Majoritets bestræbelser på at opbygge et nyt system, skyldes, at det vestlige finanssystem er håbløst bankerot, som min afdøde mand Lyndon LaRouche tidligt og ofte påpegede. Men nu har selv Christine Lagarde, chefen for Den Europæiske Centralbank, bekræftet det, som Lyndon LaRouche lagde frem med sin tredobbelte kurvefunktion, hvor han viste de forskellige kurver, hvorved de finansielle aggregater og monetære aggregater bevæger sig hyperbolsk opad, og produktionen i den fysiske økonomi hyperbolsk nedad. Der er et bestemt punkt, hvor disse to monetære og finansielle aggregater krydser hinanden, og man har et sammenbrud af systemet. Lagarde sagde, at hun er bekymret for netop det, at rollen og størrelsen af de ikke-banker – investeringsfonde, hedgefonde, værdipapirsmidler, forsikringsselskaber og forskellige andre sådanne instrumenter – er gået fra 140 % af BNP til nu 400 % af BNP. Ikke-bankerne udgør nu 60 % af den europæiske finansielle sektor, og det inklusive den nye rolle, som stablecoins (digitale valutaer –red.) spiller, udgør en trussel mod stabiliteten i hele det finansielle system. Det betyder altså, at det anker for stabilitet, som præsident Xi Jinping har kastet ud med sine fire globale initiativer, bør betragtes af Vesten som en måde at overveje en ordnet reorganisering af det finansielle system, før det er for sent.

Jeg vil slutte mine bemærkninger her, men jeg mener, at de udviklinger, jeg har berørt, er tilstrækkelige til, at vi mobiliserer os mere for at skabe den nye sikkerheds- og udviklingsarkitektur, som skal tage hensyn til alle landes interesser på kloden. Og som er i fuld overensstemmelse med præsident Xi Jinpings Globale Ledelsesinitiativ. Jeg mener, at vi virkelig bør overveje, hvordan vi kan få denne nye arkitektur på bordet, inden det er for sent.

Det var, hvad jeg ville sige i begyndelsen.

—————

Bemærkninger under diskussionen

[For det første] Jeg mener, at princippet om alliancefrihed nu står helt centralt—og det er udmærket. Selve idéen om blokdannelse—at man behøver en fjende, at man skal forsvare sine interesser mod en anden blok—var medvirkende årsag til to verdenskrige i det 20. århundrede. Jeg mener, vi bør foreslå præsident Trump til Nobels fredspris, fordi han, måske uden at have tilsigtet det, styrker princippet om alliancefrihed; resultatet er under alle omstændigheder frugtbart. [For eksempel kom Kina og Indien tættere på hinanden som reaktion på Trumps toldpolitik. – red.] Jeg kan kun gentage, at det værste, der kunne ske i Vesten, er, hvis nogle krigsmagere nu siger: “Vi må knuse dette Globale Flertal.” Det bliver stadig mere urealistisk. At Pakistan nu er med i BRIKS og i SCO—og udvider sin atomare paraply til, hvad der snart kan omfatte hele den arabiske verden og måske den islamiske verden bredere—understreger blot, at verdenssituationen har ændret sig. Det eneste fornuftige for de vestlige lande er at sige: “Vi stopper konfrontationen og vælger samarbejde.” Jeg håber, vurderingen fra visse russiske kommentatorer—herunder udenrigsminister Lavrov; måske var det i virkeligheden Lukyanov—om at den nuværende vestlige ledelse er ude af stand til en sådan tilpasning, ikke holder stik. Vi skal ikke vente på en ny generation; jeg håber, at vi i tide kan skabe et rimeligt skifte mod samarbejde.

[Som svar på et spørgsmål om, hvorfor begge FN-domstole var så langsomme til at konkludere det åbenlyse—folkedrab?] Det ved jeg ikke med sikkerhed. Domstole er normalt ekstremt grundige i deres vurderinger og følger deres egen indre logik. Når man studerer retsvidenskab, studerer man nærmest en hel geometri; taler man med jurister på deres eget fagsprog, kan de være vanskelige at følge. Der er et åbenlyst behov for at etablere et sammenhængende retsgrundlag og derefter holde sig strengt til dets “geometrier”. Når det er sagt, er det efter min opfattelse helt utilfredsstillende. Hele FN-systemet—som de to domstole er del af—trænger til reform. Det havde måske en særlig funktion i den umiddelbare efterkrigstid, og der foregår stadig vigtige diskussioner: Skal FN’s Sikkerhedsråd indgå i reformen eller ej? Der findes vægtige argumenter på flere sider. Men én ting er klar: FN er uerstatteligt—det er det eneste organ, der kan repræsentere verdens nationer—og FN-Pagten må forblive det ufravigelige grundlag. Ud over dette er den åbenlyse underrepræsentation af det Globale Syd formentlig det mest presserende spørgsmål; at rette op på det kunne også afhjælpe den problematik, du nævner. Der bør findes en hasteprocedure, så det ikke tager år at træffe afgørelser om konstateringer af igangværende folkedrab. Men det hører hjemme i en akut, overordnet reform af FN.

[Om sammenbrud i efterretningsdeling og sikkerhed] Hele systemet er i uføre. Der har længe været tale om demokrati og frihedsrettigheder, men vi ser dem blive afmonteret for øjnene af os. Jeg var oprigtigt glad, da J.D. Vance på Münchens Sikkerhedskonference revsede europæerne for at svigte ytringsfriheden og for ikke at tillade egentlig opposition. Men ser man på USA i dag, hvor populære tv-værter aflyses eller opsiges, fordi de fremsætter kritik af regeringen, så er First Amendment i realiteten under pres. Det er blot et andet udtryk for den samme udvikling. Der er et legitimt sikkerhedsbehov—måske endda midlertidigt også militært—men uden gensidig tillid mellem landene, baseret på, at man forholder sig til det bedste i hinanden, vil det ikke fungere. Man kan ikke løse problemet med flere love og dekretpolitikker; der skal ske en genopbygning af statskunst mellem nationer. Det var hensigten med Schiller Instituttet, da jeg stiftede det for 41 år siden: at gå imod en udenrigspolitik reduceret til kup, indblanding, destabilisering og—hvad vi i dag kalder—farverevolutioner. Vi må genoprette et begreb om udenrigsrelationer, hvor hver nation relaterer til det bedste hos den anden.

Når vi forholder os til USA, bør vi ikke låses fast i fortællingen om “de onde yankier”, men række ud til Benjamin Franklin, Lincoln, John Quincy Adams, Kennedy, Franklin D. Roosevelt. Og tilsvarende over for andre lande: fremhæv ikke det værste, men byg venskab og tillid på deres bedste traditioner. Ellers undslipper vi aldrig jungleloven. Lige nu lever vi i en tid, hvor alle synes at stå mod alle. Derfor gav jeg bevidst titlen på vores nylige Berlin-konference som et svar til Hobbes/Locke og sentensen homo homini lupus: “Mennesket er ikke mennesket en ulv!” Vi bør være mennesker for hinanden. Det er en del af den civilisatoriske krise i Vesten, der må overvindes.

[Om at USA tilslutter sig BRIKS] Det håb deler jeg. Mange vil mene, at det er umuligt og strider mod America First. Men i sine bedre øjeblikke antyder præsident Trump, at det ikke er helt udelukket. Når det er sagt, har han også vist, at han kan skifte kurs flere gange dagligt, så jeg ville ikke lægge alle æg i den kurv. Vi behøver folkelig mobilisering og menneske-til-menneske-dialog. Jeg ved, at mange amerikanske embedsmænd har positive personlige relationer til præsident Xi Jinping—tænk på Iowa, hvor borgmestre og andre valgte værter tog imod Xi, da han som yngre besøgte USA; også blandt landmænd er relationerne gode. Den slags direkte dialog skaber grobund for samarbejde. Kun når man kender den anden og dennes kultur, opstår det nødvendige fundament.

Vi står ved en skillelinje i historien: Enten lykkes det at få USA og de europæiske lande til at samarbejde med BRIKS, SCO, det Globale Syd og det Globale Flertal—eller også bevæger vi os mod en tredje verdenskrig. Overvej det nøje, og hvis I er enige, så tilslut jer mobiliseringen. Schiller Instituttet har fremlagt en erklæring, som vi behøver mange underskrifter på—og omfattende debat. Skriv under, spred den vidt og bredt, og hjælp med at overbevise folk om, at dét er vejen ud af vores problemer.

Afsluttende bemærkninger

Et par ord om tolerance og dialog. Det afgørende er at anerkende forskellen mellem demokrati og sandhed. Som Platon og Thukydid bemærkede, kan demokratiets bagside være tyranni; et “rent” demokrati alene fungerer ikke. Man må holde dialogen åben og udvise tolerance og respekt for den andens synspunkter—ellers bliver dialog umulig. Man skal forstå den andens grundantagelser; men man skal også søge et højere princip, som rækker ud over meningsforskellene. Det er Sokrates’ særlige styrke—den skabende fornufts evne til at begrebsliggøre det sande princip over de skiftende meninger. Den sokratiske dialog er i vidt omfang gået tabt; vi må vinde den tilbage.

Jeg vil slutte med en opfordring til handling: flere aktiviteter, flere demonstrationer, mere mobilisering for at standse dette folkedrab. Vi har nu stærke argumenter i kraft af FN-kommissionens faktarapport. Den kan ikke bortforklares—det er menneskehedens højeste autoritet, der har draget sine konklusioner. Den overordnede situation er stadig usikker. “Coalition of the Willing”, Europa-Kommissionens linje, Rearm Europe—og udtalelserne fra von der Leyen—peger den forkerte vej. Vi må mobilisere for samarbejde mellem alle nationer.

Derfor bliver 3. oktober en vigtig dag i Tyskland: Den forenede fredsbevægelse kalder til stor demonstration i Berlin og parallelt i Stuttgart. Jeg vil gerne føje IPC’s stemme og styrke til denne indsats. Hjælp med at organisere så bredt som muligt. Vi behøver hundredtusinder, måske millioner, på gaden. Husk, Berlinmurens fald blev muliggjort af omkring 2 millioner mennesker i DDR’s gader. Med den størrelsesorden må regeringer lytte.

Så: Er du i Tyskland, så tag til Berlin eller Stuttgart. Internationalt? Arrangér parallelle demonstrationer eller i det mindste vagter/lysmarkeringer. Vi skal mobilisere langt flere end hidtil. Det er min appel til jer alle.

På engelsk:

HARLEY SCHLANGER: Welcome to today’s weekly webcast with Schiller Institute founder and chairwoman Helga Zepp-LaRouche.  This is Wednesday, September 17, 2025; I’m Harley Schlanger and I’ll be your host.  You can send your questions and comments to Helga via email, at questions@schillerinstitute.org, or you can post them on the chat page.

Helga, the title of today’s dialogue is, “Will Humanity Pass the Test of Morality?” This question was often posed by your late husband Lyndon LaRouche, asking the question, do people who speak of the loss of morality in society at large, have the courage to act when human civilization is at stake? This is especially relevant now, when the UN General Assembly will be meeting tomorrow to discuss putting an end to the genocide committed by Israel against the Palestinians, to come up with some ideas for how to deal with that? A UN Commission of Inquiry released a report yesterday which concluded that Israel {is} committing genocide. What can people do to make sure the United Nations member states act to uphold morality and international law?

HELGA ZEPP-LAROUCHE: Well there are many organizations, both from Israeli background, but also Palestinian background, humanitarian organizations, the Schiller Institute, the International Peace Coalition, and may others, that are presently insisting that given the fact that the UN Security Council has not acted—and it would be their responsibility to do something about something which has been established as genocide for a very long time, by the International Court of Justice, the International Criminal Court—that the decision-making be transferred to the UN General Assembly. There is a provision for that, which is called “Uniting for Peace”: It’s a UN Resolution 377, which basically says, that if for whatever reason, the UN Security Council is blocked, that power of decision-making can go over to the UN General Assembly by a vote of two-thirds, a two-thirds majority. 

Now, it is not clear if a two-thirds majority would come about, but it is not to be excluded either, given the fact that the whole world is in an uproar. You had the combined meeting of the Arab League and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, which is I think somewhere around 70 countries already right there, and they decided on a whole bunch of measures, in which the most obvious one is an immediate ceasefire, the immediate opening of all gates for humanitarian aid, but also more drastic measures, like sanctions against Israel, like the expulsion of Israel from the United Nations for the time of the ongoing crime. And I think such a decision must be made, and the nations of the world are called upon to intervene. Because, it’s sometimes almost impossible to still find words to describe what’s going on: You have since quite some days, the IDF assault on Gaza City which is 1 million people, the bombing of high-rise buildings, and you see the photos on the internet and TV, with high-rise buildings crumbling, burying entire families and people underneath the rubble. And then people are told to leave, but there’s no place to go to! This is 1 million people in Gaza City! The horror is just unbelievable, and there must be an urgent stop to that, because I think that we are sitting on a complete powderkeg in the Middle East. 

You know now, Türkiye and others are basically saying, it’s not just what’s going on in Gaza and the West Bank, but they claim that Israel has expansionist intention for the entire region. They want part of Türkiye. Türkiye is getting rambunctious about that. They’re still depending a new strike, possibly against Iran, where we had a couple of weeks, the expert Ted Postol warning that we have two undeclared nuclear powers in the Middle East, which could trigger a global catastrophe. So, I think an action is immediately more than urgent, because I think a long-term and short-term effect of all of that Israel is making so many enemies that it is almost impossible how it should ever get an exit out of that. So Netanyahu appropriately warned the population, saying they have to be prepared for a long period of isolation, that Israel has to become like Sparta and Athens together, meaning basically autarky. And Egyptian President el-Sisi talked for the first time about Israel as “the enemy.” 

Now, these are all extremely worrisome signs, and therefore, what people should do is, you should call your elected officials, or call the embassies of the countries of the Middle East, but also other countries, that they must act. Because this UN General Assembly is probably the last opportunity to avoid a complete catastrophe. I mean, I should not say this, because it is already a complete catastrophe, but to avoid that this conflict should explode into something which could become a global Armageddon.

SCHLANGER: You referenced Netanyahu talking about Israel as isolated, and therefore having to go it alone, and choosing Sparta as a model. I brought that up on the Daily Update today, and someone wrote to me and said: “Perhaps someone should read Schiller’s {Legislation of Lycurgus and Solon}, in Israel, so they can see what Netanyahu is actually planning to do to the population there.”

Now, we have a lot to cover. One week ago, on Sept. 10, a leading Republican activists, Charlie Kirk, of Turning Point USA, was killed while speaking at a college in Utah. {EIR} has described this as part of the strategy of tension. So I received an email from a contact in Columbus, Ohio, who said: “What do you mean by ‘strategy of tension’?”

ZEPP-LAROUCHE: Well, that is actually a method, how governments, especially oligarchical governments, use terrorism, assassinations, destabilizations, large-scale, instigated demonstrations—I mean, all kinds of such measures essentially to divert attention from what is the real issue. And right now, I think the situation is so out of control internationally, because you have—I think if you look beyond all of the confetti, of what seems to be happening on a daily basis, the real issue right now is that there are forces in the so-called “West,” who are completely freaked out about the fact that they are suffering a self-inflicted crisis, caused by the rise of China, caused by the fact that the Global Majority, meaning the countries of the Global South, the BRICS, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, and many other organizations, like ASEAN, the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), and CELAC; many of these organizations are moving very clearly in the direction of building a new system. And I’m saying “self-inflicted” because they’re not doing that as an anti-Western move, not anti-American, not anti-European, but they’re doing it in self-defense. Because they don’t want to be bullied around any longer. They want to have access to credit conditions like everybody else, they don’t want to be deprived from economic development. So they’re moving towards the creation of a new economic system, based on the sovereignty of all nations, based on the respect for the different social system, according to their respective traditions. So this is all going on. 

And there are some people who have married their self-interest to the quick profit of Wall Street, of the City of London, of Silicon Valley, and similar finance places, that think if they don’t control the conditions of money-lending, of trade, that they will lose their privileges. And naturally, the military-industrial complex on both sides of the Atlantic, has a big part in it. 

So they are regarding this rise of the countries of the Global South as a mortal enemy, and the “strategy of tension” in that context is being deployed, in many countries, in order to prevent an orderly realignment of the countries of the Global South, and especially for them, the United States, of aligning with such a formation. And they got completely worried (“worried” is a too mild expression), they got completely freaked out after President Trump met with President Putin in Alaska, and found positive words for Putin, rolled out the red carpet, was riding in a car with him, having a private conversation—and they want to make sure that, rather chaos and tumult reigns, rather than the United States finding a way of normalizing relations with Russia—what Trump has promised many times. And now he wants to meet with President Xi on the telephone on Friday. And I think that there are centers that are completely freaked out about any positive alignment of President Trump with these forces. That’s, for sure, one dimension of what’s going on.

SCHLANGER: There’s one other question on the Kirk assassination. A contact wrote: “I don’t believe what police or officials say about these things, but all I see is people blaming each other, they’re talking about violence, even a civil war. Do you think something like that is possible? And who would benefit from something like that?”

ZEPP-LAROUCHE: Well, obviously, this assassination of Charlie Kirk, who was close to J.D. Vance, who was a leading person in the MAGA for the student movement. I mean, obviously, this is a very, very serious affair. Unfortunately, President Trump immediately blamed the Democrats, he blamed the left, and in that way, inadvertently or not, he contributed to the polarization in the country. And you see a similar polarization even in Europe: This morning, there was a Bundestag debate, where the leader of the opposition, Alice Weidel [AfD] accused Chancellor Merz that he didn’t even mention this. 

In any case, this incident or this murder, is being used to increase the tension, according to the Strategy of Tension MO. And I think it is extremely important that people recognize that this is going on, and that they don’t fall for that. But they stick to the idea of having a rational discussion with people who have a different political outlook, and keep to the idea that conflict resolution can only occur through dialogue, diplomacy, talking to the other side, and not by giving in to this polarization. Because I think it is a serious danger, because we are sitting on powder keg, internationally! I think that if there is not a rise to reason, and more people who basically have a sense of where society should go and come to the fore, that we are in a mortal danger of a civilizational collapse. I think it’s not inevitable, but I think the danger is clearly there, and therefore I think people of reason are called upon to act and intervene. Because I think every individual can do a lot in their immediate environment to establish a level of reason, when the emotions are flying high.

SCHLANGER: You mentioned that President Trump will be speaking by phone with President Xi of China. Of course, Xi has just had a successful series of events to pull together the Global South. And the question that comes in from someone who writes as an advocate of the BRICS, is: “What are the likely topics that Xi and Trump will cover? And do you think that Xi will discuss with Trump his misconception about the BRICS policy being anti-U.S. and anti-dollar?”

ZEPP-LAROUCHE: I’m almost 100% certain that he will do that. I mean, obviously, they will discuss the tariffs. I think President Trump has made clear in the past that when there is a direct communication with a leader like Xi Jinping, that he can snap back into a reasonable approach on the matter. Because obviously, the tariffs between the two economies are hurting both sides, and potentially could trigger a whole collapse internationally, if these punitive tariffs verdicts are continuing to really weaken the world economy. 

But I’m pretty sure that President Xi will also bring up something else, because you know, the Global Majority, which is now aligned with China, with India, with Brazil, with Russia, they had for the last several years, actually, two-three years, the discussion and implementation of three global initiatives of President Xi Jinping: the Global Security, Global Development, and Global Civilizational Initiative. And these are all part of a framework of diplomacy, how to put the whole international system of governance on a harmonious basis, based essentially on the UN Charter, the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence, and just in the last several weeks, I think around the big military parade on the 80th anniversary of the end of the Second World War, President Xi proposed a fourth initiative, called the Global Governance Initiative.  And I think this is a document of the utmost importance. I read the whole thing, and it is a very elaborated, concrete proposal, how to improve international relations, to create an international framework of creating a new system of governance, based on  sovereignty, equality, you know, that small countries have as much of a voice as  big countries; that no conflict can be decided upon over the head of any country—many, many such things. And when I read this, I said: “Oh! This is exactly fitting with what the Schiller Institute has been calling for, for the last more than three years, namely, a new global security and development architecture, which I always insisted must take into account the interest of every single country on the planet, or it does not work.

And this GGI is actually, you can take it as a complementary set of  ideas, also fitting my Ten Principles, which I wrote for how such a security and development architecture could look like. And if you take these three documents together—our proposal for the global security and development architecture; the Ten Principles; and then, very concrete and elaborated proposal by President Xi Jinping for a new Global Governance Initiative—this is actually a very concrete blueprint for the establishment of what President Xi Jinping always calls the “Shared Community for the Future of Mankind”: Which is a beautiful idea. It is the idea that we have reached, in the history of mankind, a point where we either start to move to think the one humanity first, before we think about any national interest, or regional interest, or group interest. Because only if we make this jump, which is an evolutionary jump, where you start to really give up on the idea of geopolitics and the idea of chauvinism, and the idea that you have a legitimate right you can enforce, even by force on other countries, that idea has to go! All you have to do, is look at the chaos in the world! Look at the chaos in the Middle East, look at the chaos inside the United States, look at the chaos in Europe which is not any better off, and you can see that a continuation of the present bullying policies will only lead to a global catastrophe. 

And I have said the whole time, that it means, we have to change the axioms of our thinking. And that change, just to give you a pedagogical example for how to imagine such a change, just think how people were thinking in the Middle Ages, in the 14th century, for example: You had the Black Death, you had superstition, you had the Aristotelian idea that anything has to be based on the contradiction that “A is not B.” You had the scholastics, who were debating how many angels can sit on the head of a pin, and superstition, and witchcraft, and all these crazy ideas.  And then came the beautiful Italian Renaissance, which was a Renaissance of the ancient Greek philosophy of Platonism, the Greek delegation who participated in the Council of Florence: they brought the entire works of Plato, which had been forgotten in Europe, because of the Roman Empire and the decline of the Greek model; Plato had been basically forgotten for about 1300 or even 1700 years. And there was a Renaissance, because there was a translation of the entire works of Plato, you had the writings of Nikolaus of Cusa; you had a revival of the humanist traditions of Dante, of Petrarca, incredible breakthroughs in architecture and painting. And what happened in that 15th century, which is called the “Golden Renaissance of Italy,” everything, every assumption, every axiom of thinking changed about what is an individual? What is the role of the universe? What is the relation between the individual and the laws of the universe? What is the role of science and technology in the improvement of the living standard of the population? You had an increase in urban life. 

So, if you compare the 14th century and the 15th century, in Italy especially, but also in other parts of Europe, it was like a completely new thinking.  And I’m using that as an example, to show that if we, today, can mobilize the intellectual and moral resources to say, that if we continue with this geopolitical confrontation, the idea that you always need an enemy to make progress: That’s a rotten idea! We should get rid of it, and we should move to the idea that once you start to think about the interests of the one humanity first, and then align whatever specific interest you have as a nation, or as a group, with that one humanity, you can solve all the problems, if it is based on the development of all. 

So, that’s a mental exercise, but it’s not just academic, because the Global South is already moving in that direction, because they want to get rid of being the victims of colonialism, and therefore, they have found a new way of cooperating in an harmonious way. And I would even think that the influence of China is very big, but not in the way some of the Western geopoliticians are trying to tell you: It is the influence of Confucius. Confucius, who is, for sure, the greatest philosopher of China, who had this idea of a harmonious development, which is the same idea that you have in Leibniz, you have it in Nikolaus of Cusa, who had the idea that harmony in the macrocosm can only exist if you have a development of all microcosms. And I think that that is sort of the epochal, ontological shift, you know, the jump we have to make in our thinking.

SCHLANGER: Now, on the diplomatic front…

ZEPP-LAROUCHE: And I’m sure that President Xi Jinping will bring all of these things up in his way—not the way I said it—but I’m sure he will bring up this Global Governance Initiative to President Trump. Because remember, that President Xi already had made a similar proposal—much less developed, but a similar—to President Obama, where he had proposed a special model of a great power relationship, which was based on the same ideas as they’re now contained in the Global Governance Initiative. And therefore, I’m 100% sure that President Xi will bring the same concept, in an enlarged way, up with President Trump. 

SCHLANGER: Well, it will be interesting to see how President Trump responds, as he’s been saying, he’s really looking forward to an opportunity to meet with President Xi.

Now, we have another, I guess it’s a diplomatic meeting: Trump is now in London, hosted by King Charles III. We have from the chat room, from someone dreaming of a better day, asking: “What do you think the royal family and Trump are talking about?” But let me bring up a specific question on that: Do you think Trump will bring up the role of the United Kingdom intelligence services in setting up Russiagate? And also the role of Starmer in the E3, which seems to be defying Trump’s desire for peace in Ukraine? 

Is it possible—and this is a question from one of our contacts in London—”Is it possible this visit is about reaffirming the special relationship?”

ZEPP-LAROUCHE:  Yes, obviously! I mean, I’m not optimistic about what will come out of this meeting, because, I think Starmer invited President Trump to this trip, with the clear intention to lure President Trump into this “special relationship,” by papering over the British role in Russiagate, the British role in the E3 effort to sabotage the peace in Ukraine. And I’m not so optimistic that President Trump is inoculated against such efforts. Because, I mean, I always hope for the better, but he said that he’s so proud that he’s the only head of state who has been invited twice to such a state visit. He expressed at various occasions that he is a friend of Prince Charles—King Charles by now. How can you be a friend of King Charles? I mean—[laughter] it’s completely unimaginable, such an idea.  Then, also Trump is quoted already that he says that the Windsor Castle is much better than Buckingham Palace. I mean, these are all this pomp of an outdated British monarchy! I mean, the British monarchy is outdated, the latest since the American Revolution, and I hope President Trump remembers that! That the American war against Great Britain was the War of Independence, and the creation of the American republic.

Now, I’m not so hopeful that he can avoid be cornered and lured into, really, this operatic world of the 18th century, or some museum of the 18th century. What do you need monarchies for, in the modern times? The idea of monarchy is based on a racial inequality, by the assumption that there are some people who have not red blood, but blue blood, and that they are something better! If you want to know why I’m so upset about monarchies, read the {Letters of Joseph de Maistre to a Russian Prince.} This is a very famous piece of literature, where he describes in great detail why monarchs and high nobility are so much superior to the ordinary folk. And it’s the same—it’s really terrible! And I can only hope that somehow, President Trump manages to get out of there without losing his mind completely to this pomp. 

So, I’m really concerned. I don’t think this is for any good thing. If they want to have big business, already there are headlines that big AI firms are planning to invest bigtime in Great Britain. I think they’re trying to use all tricks to reinforce this special relationship: I think that’s what the name of the game is.

SCHLANGER: And one of the areas where the British are very keen on getting more cooperation, is on cyber-security, on surveillance, and, of course, that fits in with the whole question of the strategy of tension.

Now, to conclude: It would be a Zepp-LaRouche webcast without a few questions on Germany, and I can tell you, Helga, Americans are very interested in your thoughts on this.

Now, the first one is that the question came from someone who actually is an American, who read that the former head of the Munich Security Conference Heusgen warned that Germany could be found complicit in genocide, if weapons supplied by Germany to Israel are used to kill. And he asks: “Is this a sign that there are some in Germany who are rethinking their support for Ukraine and Israel?”

ZEPP-LAROUCHE: Well, I think this is very important, because Mr. Heusgen is not exactly a peacenik. He was the adviser of Merkel at the time when Merkel was declaring that the security of Israel is the {raison d’être} for Germany: which is what people always recall when they went into this unlimited support for Israel, no matter what the present government was doing. And if this same person, who is in all likelihood the architect of that notion, that the security of Israel is the {raison d’être} for Germany, is now warning that, given the fact that the International Court of Justice and International Criminal Court, already much more than a year ago, found the likelihood that Israel is committing genocide, which in the meantime has been reasserted by a UN commission being absolutely 100% certain on that assertion; so, obviously, when Heusgen now says that if Merz sticks to his policy to invite Netanyahu to Germany, despite the fact that there is an arrest warrant by these UN courts, that Germany could be accused juridically of aiding and abetting genocide. 

Now, that’s a very serious argument, especially in Germany, given the history of the Holocaust, you now, this topic of genocide and Holocaust, all of that is more emotionally charged in Germany, for the obvious reasons than in any other place in the world. So Heusgen was German ambassador to the UN. In any case, he’s very well briefed, and he has a good sense of where things are: He would not put out such a warning, if he would not see a serious reason that this might happen, and he says, this would be devastating. And it obviously would.

So I can only hope that at this present UN General Assembly, that Germany—I can only hope that Merz is listening to Heusgen; I don’t see much hope for Merz, but hopefully he listens to that warning.

SCHLANGER: Now, the other question on Germany is about actually what’s going on the EU generally, where all this talk about “democracy” is subverted by the fact that they’re ruling against the will of the people. You have in Romania, [former right-wing presidential candidate] Calin Georgescu is not only denied the chance to be the President, but was not even allowed to run. Marine Le Pen has been excluded from the next French election. And meanwhile, you have the collapse of the French government.  But it looks as though there are still people seriously trying to ban the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) from participating in elections, even though the vote, or probably because the vote they got in North Rhine-Westphalia was three times larger than it was just a few years ago. Do you really think that the Social Democrats and the Christian Democrats would join forces to try to ban a political party in Germany? 

ZEPP-LAROUCHE: Well, it is ridiculous, because the AfD in some states, like I think Saxon-Anhalt, is leading in the polls, and the Greens, which has 3% of the vote are talking about banning the AfD! Which shows you what democratic sense they have. 

I think, if they would do that, it would really explode the country. I think, given the fact that people are really, absolutely feel that the present government—you go from a bad, I mean, Merkel was already bad! Because it was a stagnation of 16 years of nothing moved forward in a positive way; she did a lot of bad things, like the exit from nuclear energy without an alternative, and so forth and so on. But it went downhill from there! And now, the “streetlight coalition” [SPD, CDU, Greens] was voted out, because they were completely hated. But everybody is now saying, after only three months of the new so-called “Grand Coalition,” which is not so grand at all, that they’re worse than the streetlight coalition. 

The people have in the country, profoundly, the idea that they have no place to go! The government has something like 20, 22% approval rating, which is nothing! It’s terrible.

So I think the idea to ban the AfD would really explode the country, and the recent communal elections in North Rhine-Westphalia, where the SPD was the big loser, and the whole discussion was that, that means their role in the Grand Coalition would now be diminished, they have to follow what Merz [CDU] is saying, and Merz will go for brutal cuts in the social field. And if the SPD is accepting their role as a junior partner in the Grand Coalition, meaning that the CDU/CSU will basically give direction where it’s going and especially in the social field, the SPD will vanish! The Social Democracy will become the single-digit party or less. Because they have already lost their traditional voters. 

And I think the campaign, what we are doing with the Civil Rights Movement Solidarity [BüSo] and the Schiller Institute, where we campaign to completely change the course of Germany and basically say that the {only} way {all of Europe} can get out of this present existential crisis, is that we change direction, and join with the countries of the Global Majority. We should stop the idea that we have to somehow, geopolitically balance ourselves against the other great powers, Russia, China and the United States. That policy has failed! And all of Europe is in a complete disarray,  and there are many commentators in the international press, India, in China, in Russia, in Africa, that Europe is a lost model, that they have completely failed, and they have become marginalized and become completely unimportant. That the center of politics has already shifted to Asia. Asia is where the growth rates are. Europe is where the collapse rates are. 

I mean, there are commentators in the international media saying that they think Europe will continue to collapse, until you have a generational change, and the present cast of so-called leaders is replaced by a new generation. Now, that could take a long time, and you could have the destruction of Europe, which I think would be devastating, because, you know, Europe may have bad leadership right now, but Europe has a cultural heritage, which {must} play an important role in any future world community! What a shame if the beautiful compositions of Bach, and Beethoven and Shakespeare and Schiller and Dante, all of this would be lost! We really have to fight to bring back the best traditions of Europe, and hopefully, that we can inspire people to take up the offer of cooperation with the Global Majority. Because then, all problems could be solved, very, very easily. 

SCHLANGER: Well, we’ve come to the end. I have to ask you about the IPC meeting on Friday. The Schiller Institute and the International Peace Coalition have been very active at the UN, with rallies, with the [beautiful concert on Sept. 14](https://www.sinycchorus.com/cherubini_requiem_for_the_victims_of_war) which you can see on Schiller Institute NYC Chorus website. But what you do you have in store for the International Peace Coalition Zoom call on Friday [Sept. 19]?

ZEPP-LAROUCHE:  We will have several speakers from the Global South, from India, from Africa; then naturally, the Middle East situation, given the ongoing explosion there. That will be a topic, and we will have speakers as usual from Israel and from Palestine. And naturally, from Latin America. 

You should absolutely join us, because the need to unify the peace movement has never been greater! And I think that distinguishes the International Peace Coalition from other elements of the peace movement, is that we are not only opposing war and genocide, but that we are actively discussing how to get to the root causes of these difficulties or problems, by creating solutions: Like creating a new economic system, where everybody can participate: the Oasis Plan, the building of the Bering Strait connection between the Americas and the Eurasian continent, as part of the World Land-Bridge. So these conceptions are extremely important, because I think we really need to think of remedying the causes for the war, and not just be against war.

SCHLANGER: I should have mentioned it earlier, that you have on the Schiller Institute website, the [Ten Principles](https://schillerinstitute.com/blog/2022/11/30/ten-principles-of-a-new-international-security-and-development-architecture/) that you wrote, that should govern relations, and should at least be a discussion topic; and then secondly, the [leaflet and the call](https://schillerinstitute.nationbuilder.com/join_the_new_emerging_economic_order) for the West to join with the new economic architecture. 

So, Helga, thanks for taking the time to join us today, and we’ll see you later this week and again this time next week.

ZEPP-LAROUCHE: Hopefully on Friday. Till then!

af Dennis Speed (EIRNS) — 16. september 2025

Vi må søge at opbygge et nyt, fremvoksende lederskab i Vesteuropa og USA ved hjælp af alle tilgængelige midler, som er egnet til at samarbejde med den stadig mere selvsikre globale majoritet, der stræber efter storhed. Den barbariske holdning, der ikke kun kommer til udtryk i begrebet krig, men også i det menneskesyn, som krigspartiet har forfægtet siden atomkrigens indtræden i 1945, og som er personificeret i Winston Churchills »Operation Unthinkable«, har smittet store dele af den transatlantiske befolkning – selvom denne sygdom endnu ikke er dødelig. Der er modstand, men den er svag. Befolkningen må udvikle den intellektuelle styrke og udholdenhed, der skal til for at udtænke, foreslå, fremme og med succes forsvare ikke kun løsningskoncepter som LaRouches Oase-Plan, men også deres fortalere.

Mandag den 15. september bragte Schiller Instituttet sin kampagne for Oase-Planen til FN i samarbejde med flere andre organisationer. Fokus var at inspirere de mere end 193 nationer i verden, som var repræsenteret der, til at vedtage resolution 377A, »Uniting For Peace« (Forenet for fred), og allerede den 18. september at gå sammen om at erklære, at det folkemord, der nu bredt anerkendes som værende i gang i Gaza, straks skal stoppes. Der er flere tiltag, som resolution 377 bemyndiger FN til at iværksætte, herunder sanktioner, militær embargo osv., men det der virkelig er vigtigt er, at verden ikke stiller Israel, men sig selv til ansvar for at standse denne igangværende forbrydelse mod menneskeheden.

Selv den tidligere formand for München-sikkerhedskonferencen, Christoph Heusgen, som ikke er nogen »fredselsker«, har ihærdigt krævet, at Tyskland skal overholde den retspraksis, der blev fastlagt som international lov ved afslutningen af Anden Verdenskrig, og efterkomme domme fra Den Internationale Straffedomstol (ICC) og Den Internationale Domstol vedrørende Benjamin Netanyahu. “Den Internationale Domstol (ICJ) har fastslået, at der er risiko for folkemord i Gaza. Israel har ikke gennemført ICJ’s krav, såsom effektive foranstaltninger til at levere humanitær hjælp. Tværtimod sulter befolkningen. Der er derfor en reel fare for, at Tyskland, hvis det leverer våben, der bruges i Gaza, vil blive dømt for medvirken til folkemord. Det ville være ødelæggende.”

Hvorfor er verden lammet over for folkemord? Vi må se på populærkulturen i den transatlantiske verden. Se især på den musik, folk lytter til. Se på det, der kaldes »gamingkultur«. Læs derefter (så meget du kan klare) T.W. Adornos skrifter om The Philosophy of Modern Music eller Sociology and Philosophy. Søndag den 14. september, i sin mindekoncert for 9/11, opførte Schiller Instituttet Luigi Cherubinis lidet kendte Requiem som forberedelse til de opgaver, der skal udføres i FN i de kommende uger.

Klassisk kultur må ledsage ethvert begreb om sejr for det gode, som vi agter at gennemføre i verden i dag. I klassisk musik er ideen om polyfoni, enheden mellem mange forskellige instrumentalister og sangere, samlet i forskellige distinkte stemmegrupper, alle i tjeneste for en enkelt idé, den musikalske komposition, legemliggørelsen af, hvordan en ægte republik bør fungere. Ensemblets formål, dets mission, er at bevæge lytternes sind og det musikalske ensemble selv for at skabe en enhed i publikums sind, således at alle, både musikere og lyttere, forlader forestillingen som bedre mennesker, end da de kom. Dette må også blive formen for vores politiske praksis.

Schiller Instituttet og dets samarbejdspartnere i Den Internationale Fredskoalition nægtede at lade sig afskrække af den skræmmende virkning, der havde fået andre til at aflyse arrangementer i kølvandet

på mordet på Charlie Kirk. Det er ikke for at bagatellisere den sikkerhedssituation, der faktisk nu kaster en skygge over politikken i USA – også i Det Hvide Hus. Men da folkemordet fortsætter, og FN må handle, samlede Den Internationale Fredskoalition alligevel sine kræfter.

Det begyndte med bønner fremsagt af fader Harry Bury, der har været katolsk præst i 70 år og fredsaktivist siden Vietnam-krigen; Rabbi Dovid Feldman, talsmand for Neturei Karta International; og Rafed Aljoboury, formand for Integrity Political Action Committee og hovedarrangør af demonstrationen, sammen med Josephine Guilbeau, en 17-årig veteran fra den amerikanske hær og vicedirektør for Eisenhower Media Network. Der blev holdt taler fra mange forskellige organisationer, og Bronx-kandidaten til den amerikanske kongres, Jose Vega, og den tidligere kandidat til det amerikanske senat i New York, Diane Sare, talte også ved demonstrationen. Senere samledes arrangørerne til en diskussion, der udviklede sig til et sokratisk symposium, hvor fader Bury fremførte tanken om, at Oase-Planen var det samme som selve fredsbegrebet. “Tanken er at bringe udvikling til mindre udviklede nationer. Idéen er at opbygge snarere end at ødelægge. Hvad ellers kunne fredsbegrebet betyde?» Han sagde også, at «noget jeg har lært af Helga Zepp-LaRouche, selv i min alder, er at stille spørgsmålstegn ved sine antagelser.” Denne tilgang er den eneste tilgang, hvorigennem nationerne på begge sider af Atlanten kan genvinde deres moralske fornuft og deres ret til at stå ved siden af den nye, fremadrettede verdensøkonomiske orden, der er ved at opstå.

Billede: UN Photo/Yutaka Nagata

by Jason Ross
15. september 2025 (EIRNS) – ”Kun direkte samarbejde med araberne kan skabe et værdigt og sikkert liv. Hvis jøderne ikke forstår dette, vil hele den jødiske position i de arabiske lande gradvist blive uholdbar. Det, der gør mig trist, er ikke så meget, at jøderne ikke er kloge nok til at forstå dette, men snarere at de ikke er retfærdige nok til at ønske det.” Således skrev Albert Einstein i forbindelse med oprettelsen af staten Israel, hvis præsidentpost han blev tilbudt, men afslog.

Et ekstraordinært topmøde mellem Den Arabiske Liga og Organisationen for islamisk Samarbejde blev afholdt den 15. september som reaktion på Israels uhyrlige angreb i Doha, Qatar, der var rettet mod Hamas-repræsentanterne, som var der for at forhandle med deres israelske modparter. Israels angreb var rettet mod selve forhandlingerne. Topmødet udsendte et slutkommuniké, der fordømte Israels angreb på Qatar, den barbariske ødelæggelse af Gaza, bosættelserne på Vestbredden og Israels angreb på Libanon, Syrien og Iran, og opfordrede til international handling.

De forsamlede ledere krævede, at det internationale samfund handlede for at ændre Israels kurs. Konkret opfordrede de alle nationer til »at træffe alle mulige lovlige og effektive foranstaltninger for at forhindre Israel i at fortsætte sine handlinger« mod det palæstinensiske folk, herunder ved at støtte bestræbelser på at bringe en ende på landets straffrihed, stille det til ansvar for sine overtrædelser og forbrydelser, indføre sanktioner mod det, suspendere levering, overførsel eller transit af våben, ammunition og militært materiel – herunder produkter med dobbelt anvendelse – revurdere de diplomatiske og økonomiske forbindelser med det og indlede retsforfølgning mod det samt at suspendere Israel fra De Forenede Nationer.

I Madrid lukkede en menneskemængde på omkring 100.000 mennesker den sidste etape af cykelløbet Tour of Spain (Vuelta’en -red.). Premierministeren gav udtryk for sin støtte til demonstranterne, og opfordrede til at israelske hold blev udelukket fra alle internationale konkurrencer, som det er sket for russiske hold.

I mellemtiden fortsætter Moskva med at advare NATO om, at det allerede er i krig med Rusland, med konsekvenser der kan blive ødelæggende….

Mens Trump måske har forsøgt at frigøre sig fra konflikten i Ukraine ved at stille ugennemførlige krav til europæerne, bevæger han sig dybere ind i konflikten i Amerika med endnu et angreb på et venezuelansk skib og fortsætter sine stridbare udtalelser om Gaza.

Det, der er brug for, er en international kampagne for et nyt paradigme for økonomiske, kulturelle og politiske relationer – den kampagne, som bevægelsen grundlagt af Lyndon LaRouche har ført i årtier. Vi har brug for handling, og handling nu!

Billede: Alfred Eisenstaedt/CC

HELGA ZEPP-LAROUCHE: Tak, og goddag til jer alle. Jeg tror vi alle er klar over, at verden er fuldstændig ude af balance. Vi befinder os i det, man kunne kalde jungleloven. Bare for at fremhæve udviklingen: Vi havde det formodede russiske droneangreb på polsk territorium, som nogle kalder den største hændelse siden NATO’s grundlæggelse i 1949; vi havde mordet på Charlie Kirk, som helt klart har vidtrækkende betydning som en besked til alle politikere i USA og andre steder; vi havde det israelske angreb på Qatar; vi havde destabiliseringen af flere lande – Nepal, Serbien; vi har trusler mod Brasilien, Venezuela. Det er altså ikke en overdrivelse at sige, at vi virkelig står over for et meget vidtrækkende sammenbrud af den internationale orden. Jeg burde have nævnt den franske situation, som er tæt på at være umulig at styre, og den potentielle eksplosion af alting-boblen.

Vi har også dannelsen af et positivt alternativ, men lad mig først gennemgå nogle af højdepunkterne i den nuværende destabilisering. Onsdag den 10. september trængte flere russiske dronerind i polsk luftrum; omkring 16 droner. De blev opfanget i det nordvestlige Ukraine, og ifølge nogle eksperter blev de vildledt af det ukrainske luftforsvar, så de mistede retningen og fløj ind i Polen. Det er en forklaring. De blev på en eller anden måde skudt ned – enten styrtede de ned af sig selv, eller også blev de skudt ned af det polske luftforsvar. Under alle omstændigheder skete der ingen væsentlig skade, hverken på materiel eller på mennesker. Og der er nu bekræftede rapporter om, at der var øjeblikkelig kontakt mellem det hviderussiske militær og det polske militær. Det hviderussiske militær advarede det polske militær om, at nogle russiske droner sandsynligvis var blevet opfanget af elektroniske modforanstaltninger og derfor fløj ind på polsk territorium. Chefen for den polske generalstab bekræftede modtagelsen af en sådan erklæring. Så ingen blev umiddelbart berørt, og ingen kom til skade. Men det forhindrede ikke krigshøgene i Vesten i at gå ind i et hidtil uset hysteri. Det tyske magasin Der Spiegel skrev for eksempel: »Russiske droner over Polen. Tyske politikere advarer om en optrapning af krigen.« Værst af alt var The Economist, der skrev: “Dette er den mest alvorlige indtrængen på NATO-territorium siden dets grundlæggelse i 1949. Den polske premierminister sagde: ›Polen er tættest på en konflikt siden Anden Verdenskrig.‹» Han opfordrede til en fuld mobilisering af NATO og påberåbte sig artikel 4 i NATO. The Economist skrev videre: «Dette er kun et skridt videre i den større krig med Rusland, som Rusland planlægger at indlede mod Europa.» Den britiske forsvarsminister John Healey sagde: «Ukraines væbnede styrker vil styrke NATO’s luftforsvar over Polen.” De tyske medier, radio og tv, var så overdrevent dramatiske, at jeg vil spare jer for deres udtalelser. Præsident Trump sagde, at det meget vel kunne have været en fejlfunktion i disse droner, og den russiske regering sagde, at de ikke havde givet nogen ordre om at rette droner mod polsk territorium. Men det forhindrede ikke krigsfraktionerne i Koalitionen af Villige og deres håndlangere i medierne i at forsøge at øge hysteriet om den forestående krig med Rusland. Derfor synes jeg, at Robert Fico, Slovakiets premierminister, har helt ret i at kræve en uafhængig undersøgelse.

I en anden sandsynligvis relateret hændelse, selvom den tilsyneladende ikke er relateret, blev Charlie Kirk myrdet. Kirk ledede en meget stor organisation af unge mennesker, studerende, kaldet Turning Point USA. Han var i stand til at opbygge 3.500 afdelinger på universiteter over hele USA. Han er et meget vigtigt element i MAGA-bevægelsen. Han blev skudt og dræbt. Præsident Trump reagerede straks på dette og sagde, at hans administration vil finde alle de involverede, herunder de organisationer, der finansierede hele operationen. Han beskyldte grundlæggende den venstreorienterede politiske opposition for på en eller anden måde at stå bag, hvilket ikke ligefrem var hjælpsomt i betragtning af den allerede ekstraordinære polarisering i USA, som gennem dette mord nu

når et farligt nyt stadie. Vi har rapporter fra folk på stedet om, at folk på venstrefløjen, religiøse organisationer og andre siger, at der var en vis jubel over dette drab, hvilket afspejler den dybe forvirring i befolkningen og den urimelige ophidselse af befolkningen.

Kirk havde allerede nogle år tidligere advaret om, at der var dødstrusler mod ham. Han havde skrevet på Twitter, at en sådan trussel eksisterede, og han henviste til »den person«. Det viser sig, at »den person« var en beboer i Las Vegas ved navn Ashton Cirillo, tidligere Sarah Ashton-Cirillo. Kirk, der længe var ven med den daværende senator og nuværende vicepræsident J.D. Vance, havde allerede i 2023 skrevet til præsident Biden og udenrigsminister Blinken og advaret om denne person. Ashton-Cirillo kan være eller ikke være relateret til dette, men det er klart, at et sådant miljø eksisterede. Senator Alexei Pushkov, formand for Informationsudvalget i Den Russiske Føderations Råd, har bemærket, at dette mord efter hans opfattelse er en klar besked til præsident Trump og alle andre fremtrædende personer i det amerikanske offentlige liv, der har lignende synspunkter. Men han mener, at den vigtigste besked er en advarsel til præsident Trump, der allerede har overlevet to nylige attentatforsøg.

Den anden vigtige begivenhed, der kom på forsiden af aviserne og er et alvorligt skridt i retning af jungleloven, var Israels angreb på Qatar på den bygning, hvor Hamas-forhandlerne mødtes for at drøfte en mulig aftale med israelerne om gidslerne. De skulle have været dræbt, men det blev de ikke. Kun sønnen til en af Hamas-lederne blev myrdet. Men det er naturligvis en utrolig begivenhed, hvis man pludselig bomber Qatar, som er en af USA’s nærmeste allierede, når de tilbyder deres hjælp til at lette forhandlingerne i en meget desperat situation. Qatars premierminister sagde, at dette angreb dræbte alle håb for gidslerne. Han kræver nu, at premierminister Netanyahu stilles for retten. Denne handling blev fordømt af alle arabiske stater, og den har helt sikkert gjort alting meget vanskeligere. Hvem vil nu tilbyde deres hjælp til forhandlingerne? Hvis man flytter forhandlingerne til Kairo, bliver man bombet i Kairo; hvis man gør det i Amman, bliver man bombet i Amman. Hvis dette ikke bliver rettet op med passende foranstaltninger, betyder det, at verden er taget endnu et skridt i retning af jungleloven.

Det store spørgsmål er naturligvis, om præsident Trump vidste det? Der er modstridende udtalelser, og nu er historien ikke særlig klar. Under alle omstændigheder ser det ud til, at Trump blev advaret for sent, da raketterne allerede var i luften, og derfor kom advarslen til Qatar, efter at angrebet havde fundet sted. Det eneste positive er, at for første gang stemte de fem permanente medlemmer af FN’s Sikkerhedsråd, der straks blev indkaldt, alle for at fordømme Israels handling. Det er første gang, at USA har taget klart afstand fra Israels handlinger. Men det er naturligvis langt fra at afhjælpe situationen. Som I ved, er FN’s Generalforsamling nu begyndt, og mange organisationer – herunder IPC – kræver resolution nr. 377 om forening for fred, hvorved beslutningsmagten ved et flertal på to tredjedele i FN’s Generalforsamling flyttes fra FN’s Sikkerhedsråd til FN’s Generalforsamling for at træffe foranstaltninger til at afhjælpe situationen. Der er en fuld mobilisering i gang for dette, og vi vil også diskutere dette i dag.

Den eneste ekstremt positive udvikling, der hører til verdensbilledet, er det faktum, at vi ikke må glemme, at hele denne strategi med spændinger, der omfatter fremskyndelsen af det russiske droneangreb på Polen, drabet på Charlie Kirk, angrebene på Qatar, destabiliseringen af Serbien og Nepal, angrebene i Latinamerika mod Brasilien og Venezuela – fællesnævneren for alt dette er, at det er en reaktion på, at der er ved at opstå et nyt verdensøkonomisk system med dette SCO-møde i Tianjin, Kina, i begyndelsen af september og de efterfølgende meddelelser om, at denne organisation planlægger at oprette en ny SCO-bank for at skabe kredit til infrastruktur og anden udvikling. Det er et

nyt system, der er ved at opstå, af lande, der i forening med BRIKS, Den eurasiske økonomiske Union, ASEAN, CELAC og Den Afrikanske Union – med andre ord med organisationer fra det globale Syd – er i færd med at organisere et nyt system baseret på FN-pagten, de fem principper for fredelig sameksistens, som et klart svar på Vestens forsøg på at etablere en unipolær verden i tiden efter Den kolde Krig.

Nu er der en ny udvikling, som jeg mener er af største betydning, nemlig at præsident Xi Jinping har tilføjet en fjerde til sine tre globale udviklingsinitiativer – det globale udviklings-, sikkerheds- og civilisationsinitiativ – nemlig det globale styringsinitiativ. Jeg vil opfordre alle til at læse dette i detaljer. Det er et meget imponerende dokument, der i detaljer beskriver, hvordan de internationale relationer mellem stater kan organiseres på basis af suverænitet, respekt for forskellige sociale systemer, ikke-indblanding, lige stemmeret uanset landets størrelse og ingen beslutninger truffet over hovedet på de berørte lande. Under alle omstændigheder er det en meget detaljeret plan for, hvordan man kan organisere en ny sikkerheds- og udviklingsarkitektur, som jeg har bedt om siden den særlige militæroperation startede i februar 2022. Sammen med mine Ti Principper er det en indførelse af, hvordan man kan sætte sig til forhandlingsbordet, som man gjorde ved den Westfalske Fred, og løse alle territoriale, historiske og andre konflikter ved at have en struktur, hvor alle føler, at de er repræsenteret, og at deres interesser bliver varetaget, uanset om de er et stort eller et lille land. Jeg mener, at dette er et absolut brugbart dokument til at nå frem til en ny sikkerheds- og udviklingsarkitektur. Derfor vil jeg opfordre alle deltagere i IPC til at studere dette dokument inden næste uge. Jeg mener, at det fortjener at blive kendt af hele verden. Det giver mere ammunition til Schiller Instituttets nylige opfordring til de vestlige lande om at slutte sig til den globale majoritet i det nye system, hvis vi skal komme ud af denne krise.

Så selvom vi står over for en utrolig fare, er der også absolut lys for enden af tunnelen og en vej ud af dette. Jeg mener, at vi skal diskutere både farerne for verdensfreden og med eftertryk løsningerne for at komme ud af det. Mange medlemmer af fredsbevægelsen er meget opmærksomme på denne eller hin fare, men jeg tror, at meget få tænker over, hvordan vi etablerer en retfærdig ny økonomisk orden i alle landes interesser på kloden. Det er den eneste måde, vi kan opnå varig fred på. Det var det, jeg ville sige i begyndelsen.

Fortsættelsen på engelsk:

Remarks during the Discussion:

I think a lot of important topics have been brought up. I think that unless there is a reversal and the Palestinians will get visas, if that does not occur, then I would suggest that IPC include in our mobilization that the UN General Assembly be moved to Geneva. Because I think that is the absolute precondition for any semblance of justice, because the Palestinians are obviously the people who are in the middle of being targetted for elimination. So, I would suggest that for your consideration.

Otherwise, I can only say that I just got a message which reported that in response to the assassination of Charlie Kirk, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is cancelling her appearance at a weekend rally in North Carolina; obviously in response to the perceived threat to all politicians who have a distinct view on these matters. So, will that be followed by all other people? Will that be the end of politics in the United States and elsewhere? It just shows you that we really need to move to a completely New Paradigm which was outlined by Shakeel Ramay; and I also touched upon it with the Global Governance Initiative of President Xi Jinping. I have been convinced for a very long time that we cannot solve all the different problems one-by-one. Because we are involved in a systemic breakdown; and when you have a condition like that, you need to address the root causes. That means we have to go back to the principles of natural law, of sovereignty, of the UN Charter, and create a new system based on these foundations of the UN Charter and the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence, to build a system which functions. Unless we do that, I’m very concerned that it will get worse and worse in all these different fields.

Now, concerning the role of the British Empire, I would like to remind especially the Americans on this call that the role of the British subversion of the American republic needs to be addressed. Because the whole unipolar world, as it was pursued in the post-Cold War period by neo-cons in the United States, was based on the special relationship with the British Empire. And that is the root cause, because at a certain point the British establishment decided to subvert the American elites to adopt the model of the British Empire to rule the world together. I think unless that is clearly understood, we will not be able to solve these problems. I think the upcoming 250th anniversary of the American Revolution and American War of Independence is a very good reason to remind Americans what America was founded for, and why the principles of the American republic are fundamentally opposite to what the British Empire stands for and stood for.

So, I would urge people to really join our fight to go into New Paradigm; sign the newest statement by the Schiller Institute that the Western nations must join the Global Majority if we are supposed to come out of this crisis. Please sign this document, circulate it widely, and let’s all move so the people in the Western countries develop an understanding for why there must be an alternative. Because the mainstream media do generally under-report, slander, mischaracterize, as if that would be the fight between the democracies and the autocracies. But nothing could be further from the truth. So, sign this new statement by the Schiller Institute and more importantly help us to organize as many people as possible to understand what that is all about.

[Later in the discussion] I think what you are saying is absolutely right. Because when you are confronted with a great evil which makes you feel helpless, the sign is a reflection of the fact that we are here because we want to do everything we can to solve the problem. But you are confronted with the situation that if the United States is backing Israel, everybody says what should a UN peacekeeping force do? Blue Helmets, yeah, we are demanding that; it has to be big enough so that the only hope is that the conscience of the Israeli population gets awakened to the point that they demand a change of this policy. There is a growing resistance inside Israel, but send a robust armed UN mission, well I cannot imagine how even a robust UN mission would be able to confront the military of the IDF backed by the United States. So, that does not seem to be a very promising way. What Shakeel was saying, that you have to first make sure the people know what the objectives of the Israelis are; the Greater Israel. There can be no doubt that that’s the case. I think we should also demand that people who know this religious side of the thing much better, should speak out. Because when it refers to the Old Testament and supposedly in the Old Testament or not about the Analect being the reference point, I think we should demand that people who have studied theology, professors of theology, people in the different churches who have much better knowledge about these matters than I would claim to have. I’m not exactly Biblefest [bible proof], as they say in Germany. I know something about the Bible, but I wouldn’t claim to be an expert. So, we should demand that the churches speak out about this, because it has to be done competently, convincingly. I can only hear a deafening silence from most churches, so we should make that an issue.

But most importantly, I think what you said, we need to have love. And that is the most difficult, because then you are confronted with such an incredible evil and injustice is too mild a word. It’s very difficult to mobilize love; but I absolutely know that if you do not overcome the impulse to be furious, or even hate, or be angry with a more positive feeling; namely the feeling of love for all humanity, you cannot find the solution. I know that because when you are rageful for whatever reason, your reason blends out. Therefore, I think the mobilization of love is really the most important. We should never give up hope on what I tried to express in the Tenth Principle, which I think is a very profound principle. Because concerning the nature of man being good, and that all evil is the result of lack of development, and that is a very hopeful idea. Because if it’s a lack of development, it can be overcome through development. And even more importantly, man has an infinite capacity for self-perfection not only of the mind, but also of the beauty of the character. That characteristic is in correspondence to the laws of the physical universe. The proof of it is very easy. I could make a long presentation, but the short version is that it’s proven by the fact that an idea which is created in the creative human mind has, when it’s an adequate idea, an impact on the physical universe by being able to change it. That means there is a correspondence between the creative powers of the human mind and the lawfulness of the universe. That is why natural law is efficient, and why evil eventually brings down destruction on itself. You can violate natural law for a long time, but you cannot violate it forever. This is, by the way, why we have named our cultural magazine in German Ibykus. Because for those of you who know the poem by Friedrich Schiller “Ibykus”, it refers to the fact that there is a higher power of reason, and the Ibykus principle is that which calls on these superior forces which do exist. I would urge all of you to read the beautiful poem of “Ibykus.” If you can do it in German, there are also competent translations; because that principle exists as a real force in the universe, I’m absolutely convinced. I think it should also give something for the Israeli people to think about, because if they do not rectify the evil being committed in their name, I’m not so sure that they will not bring about their own destruction; because these laws do exist in the real universe. That is my short answer.

Concluding Remarks:

It’s funny, I had just thought about the same thing: Citizens of the world unite! That has to do with the fact that it’s a variation of Karl [Marx], my favorite citizen of my hometown, Trier. He said, “Proletarians of the world unite!” I changed it into “Citizens of the world unite!” because that is where we are at.

I think we should do what Ingrid said with these letters. Everybody who is listening to this call should get this letter to their government and get other people to do likewise. I think it counts right now a lot.

Otherwise, I think a lot of good ideas came out of this discussion. I think this idea that we should get some theologians to address this issue is a very productive idea, because it’s a scientific question. It’s not something nebulous or that one cannot know about. Otherwise, I would say we should take the view that with the SCO meeting, a dramatic change has occurred. There is a new sense of confidence among the nations of the Global South; especially naturally with the leadership of President Xi Jinping, President Putin, President Lula, Prime Minister Modi. I think that the task, that we have to convince the citizens of the Global North or the Global West to give up their arrogance, that there is something better sitting on a higher horse. Thinking that Europe is a garden and the rest is a jungle, you can see how much Europe is disintegrating and the jungle is already happily growing inside the European countries. You don’t need any influence from the outside.

But we have to tell people that this is now the moment where the European and American citizens can make a difference by clearly expressing that they want to cooperate with the Global Majority. I was very happy when I read the Global Governance Initiative by President Xi Jinping, because I thought, “This is perfect! This is a complete echoing of what we have been fighting for with the new security and development architecture since almost 2.5 years now.” It is a workable proposal; so let’s get some professors, think tanks, elected politicians engaged in a discussion, and let them say that they want to cooperate. I think we could move this very quickly, because the popularity of these present governments—at least in Europe—is very dwindling. Macron has 17%; Merz has maybe 20% or 22% if at all; Starmer may have 5% (that’s an educated guess). So, they’re not exactly in a strong position. If we get some real discussion among the population that they want to be part of this world citizens unite movement, I think it can be done.

So, let’s go out and multiply as much as we can.

Jason Ross (EIRNS) og redaktøren

14. september 2025

Ved afslutningen af en koncert, han dirigerede den 11. september, holdt den israelske dirigent Ilan Volkov en kort, lidenskabelig tale til publikum.

»I mit hjerte er der stor smerte nu, hver dag i flere måneder. Jeg kommer fra Israel og bor der. Jeg elsker det, det er mit hjem, men det, der sker, er grusomt og forfærdeligt i et omfang, der er ufatteligt. Jeg ved, at mange af os føler os fuldstændig hjælpeløse over for det. Uskyldige palæstinensere bliver dræbt i tusindvis, fordrevet igen og igen, uden hospitaler og skoler, uden at vide, hvornår de får deres næste måltid. Israelske gidsler holdes under forfærdelige forhold i næsten to år, og politiske fanger er hensygne i israelske fængsler.

Israelere-jøder og palæstinensere vil ikke være i stand til at stoppe dette alene. Jeg beder jer alle om at gøre alt, hvad der står i jeres magt for at stoppe denne galskab. Hver eneste lille handling tæller, mens regeringerne tøver og venter. Vi kan ikke lade dette fortsætte længere, for hvert øjeblik, der går, bringer millioner af menneskers sikkerhed i fare.

Tak.«

Se Ilan Volkovs tale og publikums reaktion her.

BBC havde afbrudt udsendelsen lige før Volkov talte og sagde, at de ikke var blevet informeret om, at han ville komme med en erklæring.

I et interview efter koncerten meddelte Volkov, at han ikke vil arbejde i Israel på nuværende tidspunkt. »Udtrykket ›ikke i mit navn‹ er ikke altid nyttigt,« siger han. »Men denne krig finder sted i mit navn, og jeg vil kæmpe imod den. Vi må tage stilling. Vi må tænke kreativt om, hvad vi kan gøre. Jeg tror, at alle ikke-voldelige måder at forsøge at påvirke situationen på er afgørende nu.«

Freden vil ikke komme indefra Israel, sagde han. »Vi israelere alene – palæstinenserne og den lille minoritet af jøder, der er imod det hele – vil ikke være i stand til at stoppe Netanyahus regering. Vi har brug for hele verdens støtte for at få denne massakre til at stoppe.«

Billede: X/Trita Parsi

9. september 2025 (Schiller Instituttet) — Denne opfordring til handling ledsager underskriftsindsamlingen: Vestens nationer må samarbejde med den nye verdensøkonomiske orden!, som er en del af en dobbeltsidet folder, der distribueres over hele verden, med særlig vægt på FN’s Generalforsamling, der finder sted i New York City. 

Verdens civilisation går ind i en ny tid efter de ekstraordinære beslutninger, der blev truffet på SCO-topmødet, og de dybtgående skridt hen imod et paradigme for fred gennem økonomisk udvikling. Disse ændringer giver verdens befolkning en værdifuld mulighed for at reagere og skabe en ny retfærdig sikkerheds- og udviklingsarkitektur, så hvert menneskeliv behandles med værdighed og respekt.

I denne globale sammenhæng skitserede professor Jeffrey Sachs i en artikel i Consortium News den 6. september konkrete handlinger for ledere, organisationer og repræsentanter til at iværksætte for at bringe folkemordet til ophør. Disse krav er sammenfattet nedenfor:

1. Afslut al økonomisk handel, skibsfart og luftfart med Israel, som Tyrkiet for nylig har gjort.

2. Alle FN-medlemsstater, der endnu ikke har gjort det, bør anerkende Staten Palæstina.

3. De arabiske underskrivere af Abraham-aftalerne, Bahrain, Marokko, Sudan og De forenede arabiske Emirater, bør suspendere deres diplomatiske forbindelser med Israel, indtil belejringen af Gaza ophører, og Staten Palæstina optages i FN.

4. Suspendér Israel fra FN’s Generalforsamling, som det skete i tilfældet med det sydafrikanske apartheidregime.

5. FN’s medlemsstater bør stoppe eksporten af alle teknologitjenester, der understøtter krigen (Amazon, Microsoft), indtil belejringen af Gaza ophører, og Palæstinas medlemskab af FN vedtages af FN’s Sikkerhedsråd.

6. I henhold til resolution 377, Forenet for fred, bør der sendes en FN-beskyttelsesstyrke til Gaza og Vestbredden. Sachs skriver: »Normalt ville det være FN’s Sikkerhedsråd, der udsteder mandat til en beskyttelsesstyrke, men i dette tilfælde vil USA blokere Sikkerhedsrådet med sin vetoret. Der er en anden måde.«

Ud over ovenstående skal der være en plan for genopbygning af hele regionen, hvilket vil kræve store mængder energi og ferskvand. Lyndon LaRouches Oase-plan fra 1975 ville være en god model og vil blive en reel mulighed, hvis Vesten kan opgive sin destruktive, kortsigtede stræben efter globalt herredømme og samarbejde med det globale flertal, som foreslået i Schiller Instituttets appel på den anden side af dette blad.

Vi opfordrer alle organisationer, ledere og repræsentanter til at følge disse umiddelbare handlinger. Vær med i det internationale kor for at skabe en æra, hvor vi kan have ægte fred og velstand for alle menneskeliv.

Billede: gloucester2gaza, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Af Megan Dobrodt

9. september 2025 (EIRNS) — En gruppe på flere dusin FN-eksperter, ledet af FN’s særlige rapportør Francesca Albanese, udsendte en appel den 5. september, hvor de opfordrede FN’s Generalforsamling til at indkalde til et ekstraordinært møde om den forfærdelige situation, der udspiller sig i Gaza. De fastslår, at det er presserende at handle omgående, selv før fristen den 17. september. »I dette kritiske øjeblik har verden brug for, at Generalforsamlingen – FN’s højeste organ – tager et afgørende lederskab og handler for at forhindre yderligere katastrofer.«

»De forfærdelige dødsfald som følge af sult vil blive værre, hvis Israel ikke stoppes. Allerede nu sulter en halv million mennesker i Gaza. Er statsmyndighederne blevet så følelsesløse over for disse tal – så afstumpede, endnu en gang, over for de systematiske brud på vores kollektive moralske og juridiske forpligtelser?«

Eksperterne opfordrer til, at FN’s Generalforsamling træffer seks foranstaltninger på et sådant ekstraordinært møde:

1. Opfordre medlemslandene til at handle i henhold til »forenet for fred« i overensstemmelse med Generalforsamlingens resolution 377 V og anbefale en fredsoperation.

2. Kræve, at alle grænseovergange åbnes for ubegrænset humanitær adgang under direkte FN-tilsyn.

3. Kræve øjeblikkelig suspension af mislykkede eller farlige mekanismer, herunder dem, der har ført til omfattende drab ved hjælpe-distribueringssteder.

4. Opfordre medlemsstater med havne i Middelhavet til hurtigst muligt at indsætte nødflåder med humanitær hjælp.

5. Anmode om godkendelse af FN-ledede internationale humanitære konvojer med fuld FN-myndighed til at koordinere og overvåge alle grænseovergange til Gaza.

6. Kræve en øjeblikkelig, permanent våbenhvile og løsladelse af vilkårligt tilbageholdte palæstinensere og israelere.

Billede: Video grab fra EIR Danmarks video om Francesca Albaneses pressekonference i København den 6. febrar 2025. Videoen kan ses her inkl. EIR’s to spørgsmål.

Ikke korrekturlæst
HARLEY SCHLANGER: Hej og velkommen til vores ugentlige dialog med Helga Zepp-LaRouche. Hun er grundlægger og formand for Schiller-instituttet. I dag er det den 10. september 2025. Jeg hedder Harley Schlanger og er din vært. Du kan sende dine spørgsmål og kommentarer til Helga via e-mail til questions@schillerinstitute.org, eller du kan skrive dem på chat-siden.
Helga, der er forventninger om, at FN vil indkalde til et ekstraordinært møde i Generalforsamlingen for at drøfte en afslutning på Netanyahu-regimets folkemordspolitik mod palæstinenserne. Det meste af verden anerkender, at dette er folkemord, men Israel har endnu en gang vist sin foragt for international ret med et luftangreb mod Hamas-ledere i Doha, Qatar, i går. Din første reaktion var at sige, at hvis Trump ikke fordømmer dette, er det jungleloven, der gælder. Han fordømte det ikke helt, men vil du sige, at dette seneste angreb fra Israels side måske er gået et skridt for langt?

HELGA ZEPP-LAROUCHE: Det er selvfølgelig ikke første gang, at Israel har besluttet at dræbe ledende personer i andre lande og dermed åbenlyst overtrådt folkeretten og i grunden begået statsterrorisme. Men dette angreb har særligt store konsekvenser, fordi det var rettet mod netop de Hamas-ledere, der angiveligt var i gang med at forhandle om frigivelsen af de israelske gidsler og mulige andre spørgsmål omkring situationen i Gaza, som er forfærdelig. Qatar var – sandsynligvis – et land, der tidligere har været vært for mange sådanne forhandlinger, og blev takket for denne rolle ved at blive angrebet af et israelsk fly eller missil eller hvad det nu var. Så jeg tror, at Qatars rolle som mægler nu er i fare, for hvorfor skulle man fortsætte med dette, hvis det er det, man får ud af det? Derfor var min umiddelbare reaktion, at hvis præsident Trump ikke kun distancerer sig, men også tager skridt til at forhindre en gentagelse af dette, er det jungleloven, som vi allerede er meget langt på vej mod, i betragtning af at der var forhandlinger med Iran, og så midt i det hele angreb Israel Iran, og kort derefter gjorde USA det samme. Dette har allerede bragt spørgsmålet om tillid og spørgsmålet om diplomati i absolut fare. Hvad kan man stole på, hvis det er det, der sker? Men nu, hvis så ekstremt følsomme og vidtrækkende forhandlinger som dem i Qatar bliver bombet, og hvis USA støtter det, ville det være slutningen på enhver civiliseret adfærd i internationale relationer.

Nu er omstændighederne stadig lidt uklare. Først sagde Det Hvide Hus, at de var blevet informeret, og at de havde informeret Qatar. Men så sagde den qatarske regering, at de først fik advarslen ti minutter efter angrebet. Så vidt jeg kan forstå af de forskellige oplysninger, korrigerede Det Hvide Hus efterfølgende og sagde, at de fik beskeden om angrebet fra israelerne for sent til at kunne informere Qatar i tide. Så det hele er meget uklart. Det ser ud til, at USA først blev informeret, da missilerne allerede var i luften, og da var det naturligvis for sent. Ikke desto mindre er det op til Det Hvide Hus, præsident Trump og den amerikanske regering at sætte en stopper for dette, for det er helt klart, at USA er det eneste land, der kan sætte en stopper for dette, og indtil videre har vi ikke set noget overbevisende i denne retning. Så efter min mening er den internationale orden i fare og kræver en absolut presserende intervention fra det internationale samfund. For uden international lovgivning har man jungleloven, og hvis nogle af disse lande har atomvåben, kan man forestille sig, hvad det kan føre til.

SCHLANGER: I denne uge vedtog Den Internationale Sammenslutning af Folkemordsforskere en resolution, der beskylder Israel for at begå folkemord og krigsforbrydelser. Der er voksende protester og stærke fordømmelser; den spanske regering lukker for eksempel sine havne for skibsfart til Israel. Selv Ursula von der Leyen fra Europa-Kommissionen sagde, at EU vil suspendere bilaterale støtteprogrammer med Israel [Rettere, opfordrede hun EU til at gøre det, men det kræver enstemmighed — red. ]. Men spørgsmålet er – og det var det, du netop kom ind på i slutningen af dit første svar – hvad kan man gøre for at stoppe folkemordet?

ZEPP-LAROUCHE: I denne uge begynder FN’s Generalforsamling i New York. Vi – det vil sige Schiller Instituttet, den Internationale Fredskoalition og mange andre organisationer – er involveret i forskellige aktiviteter omkring FN. Vi organiserer demonstrationer; andre gør det samme.

Vi forsøger at tale med så mange FN-missioner som muligt. Der er en fælles indsats for at få vedtaget FN-resolution 377, kaldet »Forene for fred«, som først blev defineret i 1950. Det er grundlæggende en bestemmelse, hvorved man kan flytte beslutningsmagten fra FN’s Sikkerhedsråd til FN’s Generalforsamling, hvis FN’s Sikkerhedsråd ikke fungerer. Og nu fungerer det åbenbart ikke på grund af vetoretten hos en af de fem permanente medlemmer [USA-red]. I så fald kan et flertal på to tredjedele af FN’s Generalforsamling træffe en række beslutninger.
Francesca Albanese [FN’s specielrapportør for mennedskerettigheder i de besætte palæstinensiske områder], og en gruppe af hendes samarbejdspartnere har udarbejdet en række foranstaltninger, der skal træffes, herunder en FN-deployering, der skal sikre uhindret adgang til alle grænseovergange, så alle humanitære forsendelser kan nå frem uden hindringer, samt en række andre humanitære foranstaltninger.

Men jeg tror, at der også er behov for flere foranstaltninger. For eksempel at sende FN’s blå hjelme, for hvis man forsøger at sende en mere robust gruppe til regionen, vil det ende med en krig mod Israel og USA. Så det fungerer naturligvis ikke. Men hvis man havde en stor kontingent af blå hjelme, der repræsenterede det store flertal af verdens lande, der fordømmer dette folkemord, ville det gøre det klart. Og det ville forhåbentlig påvirke samvittigheden hos en del af den israelske befolkning, der i stigende antal demonstrerer for at få afsluttet krigen. De har nu også fordømt dette angreb på Qatar og sagt, at det bringer gidslernes liv i umiddelbar fare, som måske allerede har lidt under konsekvenserne af det.

Men jeg tror, at der er behov for en hel række foranstaltninger, herunder at indstille al handel med Israel foreløbig og muligvis fratage dem deres plads i FN foreløbig på grund af dette folkemord, der finder sted. Men der må træffes nogle foranstaltninger for at stoppe dette, for det er nu en total katastrofe for palæstinenserne. Det er dem, der lige nu bliver udslettet i et holocaust. Men det er i virkeligheden hele den menneskelige civilisation, der bliver dømt, for hvis vi ikke kan stoppe et folkemord, der finder sted for øjnene af hele verden, betyder det, at vi vil kollapse som civilisation. Vi vil vise os at være så brutale, at vi ikke kan opretholde nogen form for international lov.

Så hvis du er bekymret over situationen, så kontakt os; Schiller Instituttet, den Internationale Fredskoalition. Vi mødes hver fredag via YouTube og Zoom for at diskutere situationen og høre førende eksperter fra Mellemøsten og andre områder. Så slut dig til kampen, for vi har brug for en international stemme, der er høj nok til at have indflydelse.

Fortsættes på engelsk:

SCHLANGER: We just got a message in from Steve Kahler, one of our contacts, who says, “Turkiye also is ending all related aid to Israel.”

Now, in terms of the broader picture, what the Schiller Institute is doing is circulating a statement as a follow-up to the events last week in Eurasia with the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, the Eastern Economic Forum in Vladivostok, and so on. What’s going on is the establishment of a new security and development architecture which is something that you have been supporting for some time. The statement itself is available on the Schiller Institute website—“The Nations of the West Must Cooperate with the New World Economic Order.”

I received questions from people who asked about this. They said, “What is it that we should do to ask our elected officials to do? What should they do so that the West would be brought into coherence and cooperation with this new order?”

ZEPP-LAROUCHE: It’s very simple. I think if parliamentarians or government officials would simply issue statements welcoming the formation of the BRICS, welcoming the formation of the SCO and their announcement that they want to establish a just economic world order, that would be sufficient. Because the mainstream media have completely misrepresented what is going on; they say this is the autocracies against the democracies, this is a threat to the West. It is nothing of that sort! All the countries which met with the BRICS in Brazil and recently in Tianjin in China with the SCO, have stated repeatedly and loudly that it is not a bloc against NATO; it is not a bloc against the West. It is open for cooperation for every country that wants to do so. Given the fact that this is a counter-reaction against a lot of things, but against 500 years of colonialism, the countries of the Global South for the first time because of the rise of China, have the chance to overcome their neo-colonial condition and have the prospect of becoming middle-range income countries in a relatively short period of time by industrializing; by no longer exporting raw materials, but having the value chain in their own country and in that way creating wealth and making life livable for their people. For that, they need cooperation, they need science and technology, they need know-how, they need capital goods, they need machine tools, they need infrastructure. I think the best thing that would happen is that rather than trying to suppress this, the Western countries in Europe and the United States would basically say it’s a good thing that colonialism ends. They have their own historic burden to do some justice to these countries; and that they want to cooperate in helping them to fulfill what they want to accomplish. It would immediately create a basis to solve all problems on the planet. I’m not saying that lightly; I know for a fact, that the people in Brazil, in Indonesia, in India, in Egypt, in South Africa, and many other countries—China naturally, even Russia—they all would welcome such a shift. It just would mean to give up this neo-colonial arrogance that we are living in a garden and the rest of the world—which is a jungle—must not be allowed to grow into it. That’s Josep Borrell, former Vice President of the European Commission. Now, that garden doesn’t look so nice if you look at what is happening in France, among other places.

But I think that this arrogance has to stop, and we have to recognize that the countries of the Global Majority have a legitimate reason to demand equal rights and a prospect to develop. We should organize a majority of people who support that. So, ask your parliamentarian, your Congressman, your Assemblyman or—woman to issue such statements in the name of their party, their faction, or as individuals. I think that we need such a debate, and we absolutely must not miss that historic opportunity.

SCHLANGER: You can use the statement which is available on the Schiller Institute website.

So, we’re listening to Helga Zepp-LaRouche, founder and chairwoman of the Schiller Institute. Helga, you mentioned the vote in France. This was pretty much a bit of a shocker, I think; the no-confidence vote. This is, I believe, the fourth time in two years that the French Prime Minister has been voted out of office. François Bayrou is out, but Macron seems to be sticking to the same policy that ended up with the vote of no-confidence; preparing for war with Russia, austerity in France. He seems to be continuing on the same policy with the leaders of the so-called E-3—Merz in Germany and Starmer in England. What’s your sense of this potential for what happened in France to spill over into Germany? And by the way, there were demonstrations on the street, the so-called Block Everything movement in France; and they’re going to continue until austerity has stopped. Can something like this happen in Germany?

ZEPP-LAROUCHE: Yes, I think we are not very far from that. But the situation in France is pretty much out of control; so much so that the French government today is deploying an additional 80,000 troops and armored vehicles into the streets, anticipating riots and unrest. That is just the prelude, because in a few days there will be a general strike called by the trade unions. That could potentially bring the whole country to a standstill. There is no easy solution, because what happened was, Bayrou wanted to cut the budget by €44 billion, and eliminate two holidays. Practically all the four blocs of the political system violently opposed that. Normally, when a government falls for such reasons, the easy thing to do would be to devalue the currency. But given the fact that France is part of the euro system, that cannot be done. So there is now a big debate to move to Europeanize the debt. That is obviously extremely unpopular in Germany and Italy and all the other countries. They say why should German, Italian, Danish taxpayers pay for the militarization in France? So, I cannot see how that situation can be easily solved; Macron now has 17% in the polls, that’s not exactly popular. He immediately appointed his former Defense Minister Lecornu, a young person 39 years old, who is supposed to carry on this program of Bayrou. It is quite questionable whether he will get the support of the majority of the National Assembly and the population. In any case, this could be very short-lived, and it’s open-ended. You could see the same thing happening in Germany, because even though the German situation up to now has been the most controlled of anywhere in the world—talk about autocracies, I think we can claim to be an autocracy in Germany given the control of the mass media and many other aspects. But I think there is an explosion looming under the surface, because the German economy is in a freefall. You have insolvencies everywhere—machine tools, the steel sector, the chemical industry, among many agricultural areas, vineyards. The country is just experiencing a complete explosion. And it will get worse in the next weeks and months, so the possibility that we will enter something much larger than we had ten years ago with the euro crisis could happen. There is an open discussion even in the European Parliament that the EU may not survive this crisis, because the Coalition of the Willing is only called that because the others are not willing. The E-3 you mentioned—Germany, France, Great Britain, Poland, the Baltic countries, and the Scandinavians. But it is definitely not the East Europeans, not the Balkans, not the South Europeans, so the EU could actually break apart. I think that would not be anything to be sorry about, because I think the whole argument that you need a strong European Union to be in a strong position against other big players like the United States, Russia, and China, has become a laughingstock ever since von der Leyen met with Trump in Scotland, delivering all of Europe on a silver platter to Trump and his tariff policies. She completely sold out any interests of Europe, and that’s a big topic of discussion. So, if the EU dissolves, and instead you would go to any kind of Europe of the Fatherlands, you can work together as sovereign nations having a joint European position, but without a supranational bureaucracy. You could just have strong sovereign nations working together, and that would be much better than having an over-bloated bureaucracy which is incredibly expensive, using up taxpayers’ money for nothing; not representing the interests of the participating members. I think we are in for some major changes in the not-too-distant future, and we should try to ensure it goes in the direction of sovereignty and interests of the people involved, not some oligarchy.

SCHLANGER: Your description of France with 80,000 troops in the street brings up the whole question of the militarization that’s going on in the so-called trans-Atlantic countries. President Trump deployed soldiers in the streets in Washington, DC and in California. There have been mass arrests in the United Kingdom to try and stop the demonstrations; censorship. Your husband pointed out, right around the time of 9/11, that these kinds of geopolitical conflicts are used as an excuse to crack down on police state measures to impose austerity. Is that what you think we’re seeing today? Is that part of the game plan of the establishment to try and save their system through militarization?

ZEPP-LAROUCHE: Well, if you look at the approval rates of these governments, it is already abysmal. Merz’s government has 22% in the polls; Macron, 17%; Starmer is also around the same numbers. That’s less than one-fifth of the population supporting the policies. The reason is very obvious. If this Coalition of the Willing—or Coalition of the Brain Dead, Ray McGovern’s favorite name for them; and given the fact that they are committing policies which really put at risk the existence of their nations, I can only agree with that. If they are pursuing a military build-up, Rearm Europe, von der Leyen says, she has a program of €800 billion for the next several years. In Germany, they lifted the debt brake without limit to potentially rearm. All of this will not be enough, because what is it for? Is it against Russia? If the United States backs out of it, which still despite all difficulties it seems that Trump is committed to doing and get the relationship with Russia on a course towards normalization, the so-called Coalition of the Willing countries fighting against Russia? That’s completely absurd. The demonization of Russia is only in the media and some of the corrupt politicians who would rather pursue the interests of the military-industrial complex than the safety of their citizens. So, the situation is one where this armament policy will only lead to a potential war. But it will not lead to a possibility to defeat Russia in a confrontation. Furthermore, all the competent militaries in many countries—Germany, France, the United States, Italy, and elsewhere—all say there is cui bono for Russia to attack a European country.

Now, the media today are full of this supposed drone accidental or not accidental incursion in Poland. That needs to be clarified. The Russian Defense Ministry immediately said that they had no order out for any such attack. There are reports that maybe these drones were coming from Ukraine, maybe being misguided by accident. In any case, apart from such fluff which is being created out of this non-incident, I think what these military men argue is that there is no motive; there is no capacity. Why would Russia, which has the largest country on the planet, 11 times zones, more raw material resources than they can possibly develop—that’s why they are inviting other countries to join them in the Far East in Siberia; they don’t need anything from the West. They have enough trouble to keep their very large country coherent with only a small population of 150 million or so. But it’s completely thinly populated, so why would Russia want to do that? There are many reasons to say that Russia did not want to take over all of Ukraine, but that they were willing to negotiate a settlement was already clear in March 2022 in Istanbul. This is a whole narrative which is absolutely not … people are too credulous. I think if people would start using their own minds and keep a memory which is longer than that of a grasshopper, they would remember all of these things which we keep notice of. And naturally, we are publishing our publications which helps to keep track of these developments.

People should really stop falling for these narratives, because we need peace. There is no peace possible without Europe. It’s high time that sanity returns to politics.

SCHLANGER: Helga, I have to ask you this question, because it’s been thrown at me multiple times in the last two days, about the number of deaths Alternative for Deutschland candidates in North Rhine Westphalia. I think there are now seven who have died. There’s an upcoming election. This is a huge statistical anomaly, and of course people are very suspicious given that there’s a continuing move to try to ban the AfD. The Social Democrats and the Greens are pushing it. Do you have any comments on this?

ZEPP-LAROUCHE: Naturally, it is a statistical improbability, but as long as the AfD themselves are not making an issue, I don’t want to feed speculation. It is quite possible that there was some power play involved, but I don’t want to speculate on something I have no facts on to discuss it one way or another. If the AfD is not making it an issue, I want to not comment on it further.

SCHLANGER: Given the unwillingness of the German government to investigate the Nord Stream pipeline, I think people are skeptical, but I think what you’re saying is absolutely right.

One final question for you, and this gets to something a little bit different. There seems to be, because of the Chinese investment in Africa, the nations of the Global South demanding that their resources be used for their own development, there’s an enormous potential for Europe instead of becoming cut off, to actually work with China and Russia in Africa. I understand the Schiller Institute is producing a report on this; can you say something about that?

ZEPP-LAROUCHE: Yes. We have already at our recent Schiller conference in Berlin presented a draft report which is still being worked on, for tripartite cooperation among China, European nations, and African nations for the industrialization of Africa. That would solve the refugee crisis, because if we help the African nations to develop and industrialize, then the people have no reason to run away from their home country. So, it would be in the real self-interest of Europe to help to do that. There is one fantastic example, which was opened yesterday; namely the Grand Renaissance Dam in Ethiopia. It’s a gigantic project which involves actually several dams and a basin of 172 kilometers. It will give annually 6000MW of electricity not only for Ethiopia, but also for export to neighboring countries. So, it’s a huge game-changer in the potential of Ethiopia to industrialize and develop as a country.

That project was announced by the CEO of the Italian firm which was the crucial engineering firm together with some French and Chinese involvement. He said this is a model for the kind of cooperation between China, Europe, and Africa; and it’s a tremendous engineering masterpiece. There has been some effort by British media and others to say this will now cause conflict with Sudan and Egypt over the water supply. The reality is, that water is not being wasted, it’s just coming a bit more slowly, and it’s coming through the management of that dam. But not one drop less water comes to Sudan and Egypt. So, all these arguments are bogus arguments.

Let me just mention one other thing which I think is important in this context. In the context of the SCO summit, President Xi Jinping issued the fourth of his Global Initiatives called the Global Governance Initiative. This is a document which is incredibly important. I read it and looked at it, and it is a complete counter-design to the idea of a unipolar world which has one dominant power and all the other ones are colonies. This is a design whereby all countries big and small participate in a system of governance of equality, total respect for the sovereignty of the other, non-interference in internal affairs, respect for different social systems, cooperation, not voting on anything without the interests of the affected countries being consulted and taken into account, no change of the rules against the will of the affected countries, etc. It’s a whole huge catalogue, and I’m really very happy to say, it is the very concrete formulation of what I have been asking for for more than three years; namely the new global security and development architecture, for which I wrote Ten Principles. What the Global Governance Initiative does is to break it down into a very practical discussion of how to actually organize the participation of all countries in the realization of what I say in the Ten Principles, and what the other initiatives of China have outlined with the Belt and Road Initiative and similar things.

So, it is a very concrete proposal on how to bring back order to the world system. Naturally, it incorporates the UN Charter; it emphasizes the whole of the UN and the UN Charter and other existing international treaties. But it adds something which has been completely missing so far, and that is a framework like in the Peace of Westphalia in Münster and Osnabrück, people were sitting down for four years agreeing on principles and then fleshing it out in terms of all the details. What the Global Governance Initiative is, is a blueprint for the representatives of the different countries to sit down exactly like in the Peace of Westphalia at the negotiating table and sort things out according to these proposals and rules in great detail. So, I think this is exactly what would be the framework for the global security and development architecture, and for the idea for the Western nations to join with the Global Majority in the formation of a new system.

So, I would urge all of you listening and watching, to really pay attention to that. Because I’m absolutely certain that the countries of the Global South will absolutely be in favor of that, because it gives them the long-expected and long-desired equal rights in the world system. So, I think we should circulate this widely and have discussions about it; because it is an alternative for how the world can be brought back into order.

SCHLANGER: And I assume this will be part of the discussion at the International Peace Coalition Zoom call this Friday. Can you say something about that?

ZEPP-LAROUCHE: Yes. We will have several spokesmen from the Global South discussing the outcome of the SCO and the Global Governance Initiative. And naturally, we will have people from the Middle East; from Israel, from Palestine. Because this is the week of the UN General Assembly, and I’m pretty sure we will also cover predominantly the crisis in France, because as these mass demonstrations unfold and the general strike, I think the situation will get hotter and hotter. So, the need to change the system will become more clear, and that is naturally the topic for this coming Friday.

SCHLANGER: You can find a link for that at schillerinstitute.com. Helga, thanks for joining us today; this has been very interesting. People have to say on top of things, because things are moving so quickly.

ZEPP-LAROUCHE: Yes; join us, become active. This is not a time to sit on the fence.

af Megan Dobrodt 
9. september 2025 (EIRNS) — Tirsdag, i endnu en skamløs overtrædelse af international lov, iværksatte Israel langdistanceangreb mod Doha i Qatar, rettet mod ledere af Hamas, der var samlet der for at drøfte det seneste amerikanske forslag om våbenhvile i Gaza. Omkring kl. 16.00 lokal tid ramte tolv luftangreb boligblokke i byen, hvor to mennesker blev dræbt, herunder sønnen af en Hamas-leder, og andre blev såret. Israel meddelte stolt, at det stod bag de »præcise angreb« mod »Hamas’ øverste terrorledere« og sagde, at det havde informeret Det Hvide Hus inden angrebet.

Helga Zepp-LaRouche svarede: »Hvis Trump ikke fordømmer dette, er det jungleloven.«

Det Hvide Hus udsendte en erklæring, der fordømte placeringen af angrebet – »En ensidig bombning inde i Qatar, en suveræn nation, der er en tæt allieret med USA, og som arbejder meget hårdt og modigt tager risici sammen med os for at mægle fred, fremmer ikke Israels eller Amerikas mål« – men ikke målet med det, idet det kaldte elimineringen af Hamas »et værdigt mål«, selvom Hamas satte sig ned for at overveje et amerikansk forslag om våbenhvile.

Angrebene i Doha fulgte tæt efter lignende israelske bombninger af »terroristmål« i Libanon og Syrien mandag og tirsdag, hvilket endnu en gang demonstrerede, at den nuværende israelske regerings funktion er at sprænge muligheden for fred i luften.

Men husk, at Israel ikke er den politiske mester; det er håndgranaten. Lyndon LaRouches kommentarer i 2001 om det daværende Israels premierminister Ariel Sharon er måske endnu mere relevante i dag: »Alle os, der forstår de strategiske implikationer af den rolle, der i øjeblikket er tildelt disse israelske kejsere, ved med sikkerhed, som premierminister Rabin, der led martyrdøden, vidste, at det endelige resultat af det, Sharon og hans IDF-herrer gør, vil være Israels udslettelse.«

Så, cui bono? Hvem kastede håndgranaten?

For at begynde at forstå det, må man se på den langsigtede proces, der har ført til det lovmæssige sammenbrud af den neokoloniale verdensorden, ledet af det Britiske Imperium, som tog over i kølvandet på den amerikanske præsident Franklin Roosevelts død. Det geopolitiske system med plyndring og krig er forbi, og den Globale Majoritet, den største del af menneskeheden, er i færd med at danne en ny verdensøkonomisk orden. I sin erklæring fra 5. september 2025, »Vestens nationer må samarbejde med den nye verdensøkonomiske orden!«, som er tilgængelig for massedistribution på Schiller Instituttets hjemmeside, peger Schiller Instituttets grundlægger Helga Zepp-LaRouche på betydningen af de seneste udviklinger omkring det nye system:

“På topmødet i SCO (Shanghai Cooperation Organization) i Tianjin – der repræsenterer omkring 42 % af verdens befolkning – er der opstået en ny verdensorden, uafhængig af Vesten, baseret på principperne om suverænitet, ikke-indblanding, gensidigt fordelagtigt økonomisk samarbejde og fredeligt samarbejde…. De lande, der er samlet i SCO, sammen med de forskellige indbyrdes forbundne organisationer såsom BRIKS, Bælte- og Vej-Initiativet (BVI), Den eurasiske økonomiske Union (EAEU), ASEAN, CELAC og Den Afrikanske Union (AU), repræsenterer tilsammen 85 % af menneskeheden.”

Hør Miltons Lucifer, der med den paniske stemme fra nutidens neokoloniale globale elite skriger: »Bedre at regere i helvede end at tjene i himlen«! Det bør ikke komme som nogen overraskelse, at på

det historiske tidspunkt, hvor hele menneskeheden for første gang kunne erstatte kolonialismen med et win-win-system til gavn for hele menneskeheden, befinder vi os også i en periode med maksimal fare for provokationer hen imod krig.

Hvilken retning vi vil gå i, afhænger af hvad vi, menneskehedens borgere, kan gøre i dag – lige nu – for at vende tidevandet i Vesten hen imod samarbejde med det nye system. Dette er den eneste løsning på de rædsler, der udspiller sig i Gaza, som flere og flere stemmer kræver, at der gøres noget for at stoppe.

»Verden er således nået til et absolut vendepunkt,« siger Zepp-LaRouche. “Vi kan enten fortsætte den geopolitiske konfrontation mod Rusland og Kina og risikere en tredje – og denne gang endelig – verdenskrig, eller vi kan vælge at samarbejde med dette nye økonomiske system, der er ved at opstå….

»Det er i de kollektive vestlige nationers grundlæggende egeninteresse – som ikke længere er virkelig forenet – at samarbejde med staterne i den Globale Majoritet og i fællesskab at takle de store udfordringer, som menneskeheden står over for: at overvinde fattigdom og underudvikling, sikre varig verdensfred og sikre alle mennesker på denne planet retten til at udnytte deres potentiale.«

Billede: IDF

Introduktion på engelsk:
ANASTASIA BATTLE: Welcome, everyone. This is the International Peace Coalition. My name is Anastasia Battle and I’ll be your moderator along with Dennis Small and Dennis Speed. This is our 118th consecutive meeting; thank you for joining us in this process, veterans and newcomers alike. Please share this invitation with your friends, organizations, and reasonable enemies. I like to remind people why we created this forum 118 weeks ago; which is to unite the international peace movement. I’m sure many of you are aware that there have been many attacks to prevent people from working together because of their philosophical differences; which quite frankly is ridiculous! If we’re actually trying to create true peace for humanity, we need to collaborate together for that common goal. I want to encourage everyone to remember that and join in that process of recruiting more people to this.

To start us off today, we have Helga Zepp-LaRouche, who is the founder of the Schiller Institute and the initiator of the International Peace Coalition. Please, go ahead Helga.

På dansk (ikke korrekturlæst):
HELGA ZEPP-LAROUCHE: Tak. Først og fremmest goddag til jer alle. I dag er situationen præget af ekstreme kontraster, men der er en vigtig positiv udvikling. Faktisk synes jeg, det er yderst vigtigt, at alle er klar over, at begivenhederne ved Shanghai Samarbejdsorganisationens (SCO) topmøde i Tianjin, Kina, og de efterfølgende møder, militærparaden i Beijing og nu mødet i Vladivostok ved Det Østlige Økonomiske Forum har medført en dramatisk ændring til det bedre i verden. Der er nemlig ved at opstå et nyt økonomisk system. Det er endnu ikke konsolideret, men det er helt klart, at flertallet af verdens befolkning, der er repræsenteret på dette møde i Shanghai Cooperation Organization, har ændret verden. De er ved at skabe et uafhængigt økonomisk system, der har potentiale til at blive en ny verdensorden. Afslutningsvis vil jeg læse en kort tekst op, som I kan overveje med henblik på at støtte denne udvikling.
Det, der er sket, er, at der var det 25. møde i SCO, og som en klar reaktion på den toldkrig, som præsident Trump har indledt mod BRICS-landene, er der sket noget hidtil uset. Nemlig at Indien og Kina er kommet tættere på hinanden. Der var et meget vigtigt positivt møde mellem præsident Xi og premierminister Modi, hvor de begravede de tidligere spændinger. Naturligvis er der et meget dybe venskab mellem Putin og Modi; de blev set gå hånd i hånd og tale sammen. Det har skræmt de internationale massemedier mere end noget andet, at se disse to mænd gå hånd i hånd. Naturligvis er grundlaget for hele denne udvikling det urokkelige partnerskab mellem Rusland og Kina. Disse lande, der var repræsenteret der, repræsenterer 42 % af verdens befolkning; og hvis man tager i betragtning, at disse SCO-lande alle er forbundet og sammenkoblet med andre organisationer såsom BRICS, Den Eurasiske Økonomiske Union, ASEAN (Sydøstasien), CELAC (Latinamerika), Den Afrikanske Union, BRI (Bælte- og Vej-initiativet, Kinas interntionale infrastruktur samarbejde), så har man faktisk et netværk af organisationer og lande, der tilsammen repræsenterer det globale flertal på 85 % af menneskeheden. De har klart besluttet, at de vil skabe et nyt system baseret på suverænitet, absolut respekt for de forskellige sociale systemer, ingen indblanding i andre landes indre anliggender og fredeligt samarbejde. De er også begyndt at skabe alternative mekanismer til at beskytte sig mod økonomiske krigsføringsforanstaltninger fra det kollektive Vesten, såsom told, ensidige sanktioner, regimeskift og lignende foranstaltninger, ved nu at oprette en Shanghai Samarbejdsorganisation bank, som vil være parallel med BRICS’ New Development Bank og den allerede eksisterende AIIB [Asian Infrastrukturinvesteringsbank]. Man kan altså tydeligt se, at de forsøger at skabe kreditskabende mekanismer, der er uafhængige af den potentielle tvang og våbenisering af dollaren, udstødelse af SWIFT-systemet og lignende foranstaltninger.

Fortsættes på engelsk:
This is an extremely positive development, and I think it puts the so-called collective West, which is not united anymore at all, in front of a clear choice to either continue the geopolitical confrontation against Russia and China and in that way eventually end up in a Third World War; or, recognizing that this Global Majority is something one cannot get around any longer. Therefore, the only way is to adapt to that Global Majority. I think that change will be painful for many establishment figures in the West to acknowledge this changed reality, but I think we can already see clear signs that this is a new reality. One such reflection was the fact that at the very recent Coalition of the Willing meeting in Paris where they wanted to decide whether to send troops to Ukraine—boots on the ground—despite the fact that Macron was there pushing very hard to send troops to Ukraine for so-called “peacekeeping,” that was not welcomed. Only 6 out of the 26 countries in the Coalition of the Willing agreed to send troops. This was, naturally, Great Britain, France, the three Baltic countries, and one other country whose name I could not identify. All the others refused: Italy refused; Poland refused; Bulgaria refused; Germany refused. They had a telephone conversation from Paris with President Trump. The only thing which became known after that was that the meeting was completely disappointing because President Trump did not support whatever they were demanding. Chancellor Merz, who had been extremely bellicose before, somehow very frustrated, said Germany is not going to send troops. They will try to beef up all kinds of long-range weapons production inside Ukraine, but no troops. He said the problem is that it does not function to find a peace solution without Russia; and Russia is now in a new strengthened partnership with China and India, Brazil, and other countries. That sort of blocks a unilateral approach in Ukraine.

This is a very important shift in the strategic situation which I think we are only seeing the beginning of. Hopefully, this will also impact the situation in the Middle East, because that changing reality hopefully will soon be felt there as well. The situation on the ground in the Middle East remains one of absolute horror. The unrestrained assault on Gaza City by the IDF is continuing with all the horrible casualties continuing; the West Bank attack is going on. The response by the international community is totally insufficient; which is why we absolutely have to gear up the organizing of the IPC. Now that the month of September has arrived, on September 9th, the UN General Assembly starts, and we are pushing very hard to have the power of decision be shifted from the UN Security Council to the UN General Assembly, as is provided for in UN Resolution 377, Uniting for Peace; which allows exactly such a shift in decision-making. Then the UN General Assembly could make decisions to impose all kinds of measures—sanctions against Israel, sending peacekeeping Blue Helmet troops to the region, and whatever other measures are required. So, this meeting is at a point when the international community is shifting more and more against Israel. The news about the unprecedented since the end of World War II genocide can no longer be suppressed. There is one important—it may not be sufficient, but it is an important element, which is a movie about the developments in Gaza called “The Voice of Hind Rajab” which was presented on Sept. 3rd at the Venice Film Festival. I have not seen it, but apparently it received a 26-minute standing ovation, and everybody was in tears, including the crew which filmed the movie, because it is the absolute heart-breaking story about Hind Rajab, a 6-year old girl, who was hit by bombs while in a car with her family, and everybody else was killed. Then there are 17 minutes of live tape interwoven into the movie in which this 6-year-old girl is describing how she cannot speak because blood is coming out of her mouth; just an unbelievable account of the horror. All the other people in the car died; all her family members died, and she tries to figure out as a 6-year-old in this ocean of bloodshed and murder. [She also died before help can get there—ed.] I think this movie obviously is an important warning to the world. It’s not solving the situation, but hopefully it helps to wake up the conscience of the world to finally act. So, we have to gear up our massive efforts to get UN Resolution 377 on the agenda in the meeting which will start in a few days in New York.

The situation, as I said, has completely changed. I think that we are now experiencing one of those rare moments which I compare to the fall of the Wall in 1989, and the historic chance which was in German unification; where at the end of the Cold War, you could have changed the world. You could have installed a peace order for the 21st century. That chance was utterly missed, and instead you had the effort by the Anglosphere, the neo-cons and their cohorts in Great Britain, to establish a unipolar world with many horrible consequences. That has backfired. I think we absolutely have to mobilize the World Majority, but especially the countries of Europe, the United States, and whatever other countries are belonging to this faction of the West like Japan, and South Korea, New Zealand, to absolutely support and overcome this geopolitical division. In my view, this is the only way the Ukraine crisis can be solved. By shifting the world combination in this way, I think it’s the only way a two-state solution, immediate humanitarian aid, the Oasis Plan, the reconstruction of the Middle East can be realized. Because only if we convince the countries of the West to stop opposing the Global Majority, is there a chance to resolve this situation, this genocide in the Middle East. So therefore, my suggestion is, I will read you a very short text; and if you agree with it, I would urge you that we make that the rallying cry for the mobilization of the IPC. Because I think that can really shift the situation to address all these other issues. So, let me quickly read to you this text:

“The nations of the West must cooperate with the new world order. At the summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization [SCO] in Tianjin, representing around 42% of the world’s population, a new world order has emerged, independent of the West; founded on the principles of sovereignty, non-interference, mutually beneficial economic cooperation, and peaceful cooperation.

“In an event of global historical significance, China and India, the two most populous nations already representing 35% of the world’s population, have now begun to cooperate closely with each other and with Russia. These countries, which are also interconnected through organizations such as the BRICS, the Belt and Road Initiative, the Eurasian Economic Union, ASEAN, CELAC, and the African Union, collectively represent 85% of humanity. The emergence of this world order is a response to the collective West’s attempt after the end of the Cold War to establish a unipolar world order under Anglo-American dominance, marked by endless interventionist wars, sanctions, and regime-change efforts, which have ultimately backfired completely. The nations of the Global Majority are now overcoming an era of 500 years of colonialism and asserting their right to independent economic development.

“This is made possible above all by China’s unprecedented rise, which offers countries of the Global South a model, and cooperation that the West denied them for centuries. Thus, the world has reached an absolute turning point. We can either continue the geopolitical confrontation against Russia and China, risking a Third—and this time final—World War, or we can choose to cooperate with the new emerging economic system. President Xi Jinping has proposed the vision of a community with a shared future of mankind, which he emphasized in his speech at the SCO summit. ‘Humanity will either sink together, or rise together.’

“It is in the fundamental self-interest of the nations of the collective West, no longer truly united, to cooperate with the states of the Global Majority and jointly address the great challenges facing humankind: Overcoming poverty and under-development; ensuring lasting world peace; and securing the right of every person on the planet to fulfill their potential for the realization of a shared community for the future of humanity.”

Then I have a place for people to sign and give their signature. So, I would urge you, if you agree with that, to help us to circulate this widely; because it is also a way to in the most efficient way make sure the world majority is aware of this historical opportunity. So, that’s what I wanted to say in the beginning.

Remarks during the Discussion:

I think in light of what Josephine and Col. Aguilar were saying, I think we have to think about how we can accelerate this organizing in the United Nations, because that seems to be the only place where some action could come from right now. So, I would ask all participants to help us. You can go to the embassies; if you are in places like New York, you can make sure the embassies of the world know what was said here. I think we may be able to make available excerpts of the video from the two interventions from Josephine and Col. Aguilar to present. I think this is something which is definitely not in the news; but I think as you said, that time is not on our side, is the most pressing thing. So, that would be my immediate comment.

[in response to Bernie Holland & Doctors Against Genocide Q re Blue Helmets] Bernie, yes, you should bring us in contact with this Mr. Reschenwald[ph]. We can set it up after this call. But I think we had to do two things. I think we have to somehow, coming out of this meeting, formulate a text which can be brought to the UN Security Council. I know this is extremely unsatisfying, because the UN Security Council is exactly the place where all the initiatives have been blocked; but since we are today on the 5th of September, and the UN General Assembly starts on the 9th, I think we should use this text which would contain what you have been saying and what Josephine and Col. Aguilar have been saying; a demand for immediate intervention by the international community. If there are any experts on the United Nations, I know we are internationally in contact with several of them, I’m asking for your advice. What more can we do to accelerate immediate action? I think that the point you have been making, that time is not on our side, and every day there are unbelievable, irreversible things happening. So, Mr. Rafed, if you can say something to that as well.

So, that needs to be thought about. What can we do immediately out of this meeting to appeal to the conscience of the world in even more stronger ways than we have been doing. And secondly, is this new security and development architecture, and that’s why I put the resolution text in the beginning, because I think only if we get such a shift in the correlation of forces that the isolation of the war mongers becomes so clear that it cannot be denied any longer. But that would be my immediate response.

[later in the discussion] I think, as I said in my initial remarks in the beginning, the SCO meeting and David Munier[ph] correctly added the military parade, which was the largest military parade in history ever. I watched a good part of it, and I was completely impressed because it demonstrated both strength but also an absolute defensive orientation. In any case, I think we have entered a new era; and I don’t think everybody has completely registered that yet, because I think we have now the chance to unite humanity on a completely different basis. The enemy is not nations; it’s not the United States or some former European colonial power, it is the war party. The war party represents the oligarchy which runs the present financial institutions, of which the military component is just the last phase of profit-making if you like.

But I know a lot of people in the Global South are tending to look at the Global North or collective West in the same undifferentiated way as people in the West tend to look at people in the Global South. I want to point out the fact that you have right now a situation where the Golden Billion is not a golden billion; it’s a golden maybe million of millionaires and billionaires. But if you look at the reality, Europe is collapsing. France is disintegrating; Germany is disintegrating; the same in the United States. The people are suffering tremendously, and if it comes to an uncontrolled collapse, we would be on the verge of a complete social explosion. There is a very knowledgeable journalist who always talks about the European toothless Chihuahuas. I think I like this expression a lot, even though I think some of these politicians do have teeth even if they may be false by now. Nevertheless, they do still have them. But I would really suggest that we not look at Europe or the United States as monolithic, because they are not.

I think we have reached a point where we really have to create an international movement of people fighting for this new development system; this new era. I think Xi Jinping has really found the best expression, by calling it the shared future of the one humanity. Because that is what people have to understand; we are sitting in one boat as we have never done in history before, because in past centuries, you could have parts of the world collapsing and other parts prospering, and they didn’t even know about each other. That is because it took years to travel from one corner of the world to the next. We are all sitting in one boat.

The reason I put this text at the beginning is that I really would like to have a discussion about that. I think only if we unite people around one idea—that we have to build together a new system, a new world economic order of which the SCO and the BRICS and BRI components; basically it’s the World LandBridge conception of my late husband that we have been fighting for, for half a century. A New International Development Bank, which is now coming into being in the form of the New Development Bank; now the SCO Bank. New credit institutions which give credit for long-term development at low interest rates; overcoming poverty and under-development. I tried to put some of these ideas in my Ten Principles. We have to unite people no matter if they come from Germany, from the United States, from South Africa, from Mexico, from whatever country. But I believe only if we create a real movement of people fighting for this conception of the one humanity first, and then organizing a world system where every country can benefit and fulfill their potential.

I think especially crucial to make that happen is that we have to have young people. If we would have an international youth movement of sizeable dimensions in which young people in the United States, in Africa, in Latin America would all fight for the idea that we now need a new world economic order and it’s now on the table because of the SCO meeting creating the conditions for it to take off. I think if we can catalyze that very quickly in the short term, the war party may be looking powerful now, but we are talking about billions of people who have now for the first time been given the chance to realize a new world economic order. I think this is a moment we absolutely must not miss; and while we absolutely have to mobilize in the next hours and days because of the ongoing genocide in Gaza, I think we must not lose the perspective that only if we change the entire world system, can we stop all of these crises no matter where they occur, including the one in the Middle East.

So, I would like to really pose that again. Are you willing, and are you intending to help us to create such an international mass movement for a new world economic order? Because I think that would really be the qualitative change which would be undoable.

Closing Remarks:

I think several important initiatives came out of this discussion today. I would urge Rafed to write a text, or do it together with us, or do it alone. But I think the text of an international release which we then could, starting with the IPC participants, try to get out in all parts of international institutions; to the media, the social media, alternative media, of a call to action of what needs to be done in the next hours and says. So, please get in contact with Anastasia, because I think if we would get such a text—preferably today—we could start mobilizing with that immediately.

Then, I also think the idea to use the proposal by Pope Francis on the Jubilee 2025 can actually be brought into cohesion with the new credit mechanisms coming out of the SCO. People may think that this is different, but it must not be, because the idea of debt relief, and the issue of new credit for development are just two sides of the same coin. I think everything really depends on getting this spirit of unity, because if we can somehow put all the people and institutions of good will together and recognize that because of the new era which was consolidated, it was in process for a long time, but it sort of gelled and came out in the open with the SCO meeting. If we can somehow put all of these forces together, I think it will be an unbeatable movement.

So, I would urge you to also formulate that, and we will get it out in the same way as the call for immediate action on Gaza. I think we actually have a horrendous situation which is totally unbelievably horrible. But on the other side, there is no reason to despair, because the tendency of the time is in a positive direction, and if major countries which are extremely powerful, as demonstrated in this military parade, are putting their weight in the creation of a new world economic order, it has all the reasons for the possibility of success. I think we have to educate people that this is not against the people of the West, but only against unjust mechanisms of imperialism and colonialism, while the people of the world must unite.

So, with that, I want to end.

5. september 2025 — Følgende erklæring er udsendt af Schiller Instituttet til øjeblikkelig international distribution. Den er skrevet som en opfordring til handling i denne periode med forandringer og uro, og folk opfordres til at tilslutte sig den.

På topmødet i SCO (Shanghai Cooperation Organization) i Tianjin – der repræsenterer omkring 42 procent af verdens befolkning – er der opstået en ny verdensorden, uafhængig af Vesten, baseret på principperne om suverænitet, ikke-indblanding, gensidigt fordelagtigt økonomisk samarbejde og fredeligt samarbejde. Det er en begivenhed af global historisk betydning, at Kina og Indien – de to mest folkerige nationer, der allerede repræsenterer 35 procent af verdens befolkning – nu er begyndt at samarbejde tæt med hinanden og med Rusland. Landene, der er samlet i SCO, sammen med de forskellige indbyrdes forbundne organisationer, såsom BRIKS, Bælte- og Vej-Initiativet (BVI), Den eurasiske økonomiske Union (EAEU), ASEAN, CELAC og Den Afrikanske Union (AU), repræsenterer tilsammen 85 procent af menneskeheden.

Fremkomsten af denne nye verdensorden er et svar på det kollektive Vestens forsøg efter afslutningen af Den kolde Krig på at etablere en unipolær verden under anglo-amerikansk dominans – præget af endeløse interventionistiske krige, sanktioner og bestræbelser på regimeskifte – som i sidste ende har slået fuldstændig fejl. Nationerne i den globale majoritet er nu ved at overvinde en 500 år lang æra med kolonialisme og hævder deres ret til uafhængig økonomisk udvikling. Dette er først og fremmest muliggjort af Kinas hidtil usete fremgang, som tilbyder landene i det globale syd en model og det samarbejde, som Vesten har nægtet dem i århundreder.

Verden er således nået til et absolut vendepunkt. Vi kan enten fortsætte den geopolitiske konfrontation mod Rusland og Kina og risikere en tredje – og denne gang endelig – verdenskrig, eller vi kan vælge at samarbejde med dette nye økonomiske system, der er ved at opstå. Præsident Xi Jinping har fremsat en vision om et »fællesskab med en fælles fremtid for menneskeheden«, som han understregede i sin tale den 3. september i anledning af 80-årsdagen for Japans nederlag: »Menneskeheden vil enten synke sammen eller rejse sig sammen!«

Det er i de kollektive vestlige nationers – som ikke længere er virkelig forenede – grundlæggende egeninteresse at samarbejde med staterne i den globale majoritet og i fællesskab tackle de store udfordringer, som menneskeheden står over for: at overvinde fattigdom og underudvikling, sikre varig global fred og sikre alle mennesker på denne planet retten til at udnytte deres potentiale.

For realiseringen af et fælles samfund for menneskehedens fremtid!

Skriv gerne under her på Schiller Instituttets internationale hjemmeside.

HARLEY SCHLANGER: Goddag, og velkommen til vores ugentlige dialog med Helga Zepp-LaRouche. Hun er grundlægger og leder af Schiller Instituttet. I dag er det onsdag den 3. september 2025: Jeg hedder Harley Schlanger, og jeg er jeres vært. Du kan sende dine spørgsmål og kommentarer til fru Zepp-LaRouche på questions@schillerinstitute.org eller skrive dem på chat-siden.

Helga, som du understregede i sidste uge, befinder vi os midt i en intens diplomatisk aktivitet, som den kinesiske præsident Xi Jinping har karakteriseret som »Vi indleder en ny æra«, og dette er en afgørende forandring, der har været under opsejling i nogen tid. Du og din mand, Lyndon LaRouche, har været med siden begyndelsen; I forudsagde, at dette ville komme, og I fremsatte alle mulige ideer til det. Så jeg synes, det er bedst at starte med din sammenfatning af, hvad der skete på topmødet i Shanghai Cooperation Organization, og derefter gå videre til de andre begivenheder, der kommer.

HELGA ZEPP-LAROUCHE: Folk bør være meget, meget glade, for der er en ny verdensøkonomisk og verdensorden under opsejling, og den er faktisk allerede opstået, hvilket vil betyde en udvej for alle dele af verden, inklusive USA og Europa, selvom folk måske ikke er klar over det endnu. Det som er opstået fra topmødet i Shanghai Cooperation Organization og i morges, faktisk militærparaden i Beijing: Jeg vil gerne starte med det.

Jeg så ikke det hele, som varede mange timer, men jeg så de vigtigste dele, og jeg må sige, at det var den største militærparade i historien nogensinde. Den var så stor, at Xi Jinping for eksempel kørte i sin åbne bil og stod langs de forskellige troppeformationer og de forskellige våbensystemer i omkring 20 minutter, tror jeg, med en hastighed på 20 km, så man kan forestille sig, hvor stor den var. Og hvis man ser på troppernes militærparade, var det mere som en ballet, koreograferet ned til mindste detalje! Og jeg må virkelig rose tv-holdet, for de filmede det hele live med en nøjagtighed, der svarede til en ballet. Jeg ved, at der vil være mange mennesker, der bliver helt hysteriske og siger: »Hvad er det for en største militærparade? Xi Jinping siger, at han er for fred, og så holder han sådan en stor militærparade.«

Men jeg tror, at budskabet er, at det er for at beskytte freden, og hvis man ser på det sammen med den nye økonomiske orden, der er ved at opstå med SCO-mødet, som repræsenterede næsten halvdelen af verdens befolkning, og som er helt åben for samarbejde med de vestlige lande: Det er bevidst ikke ment som en blok. Jeg synes, det er ekstremt vigtigt, fordi det faktisk er realiseringen af et nyt system for internationale relationer. Præsident Xi Jinping har netop tilføjet en fjerde til sine tre globale initiativer, nemlig et Globalt Ledelsesinitiativ, der skal arbejde på at forbedre det globale forvaltningssystem. Og samarbejdet mellem de forskellige lande er nu også ved at etablere en ny bankfacilitet til at udstede kredit til infrastrukturudvikling i udviklingslandene.

Dette er et absolut gennembrud, og jeg kan kun opfordre jer, mine seere, til ikke at se på det gennem mainstream-mediernes briller og fortidens propaganda. Dette er virkelig en ny æra for menneskeheden. Og jeg tror, at hvis vi indtager en positiv holdning til det og stopper geopolitikken og bare siger, at vi vil samarbejde som ligeværdige med dette nye system, kan vi løse faren for krig; vi kan løse den økonomiske krise, vi kan endog løse det fallerede finanssystem i Vesten, vi kan løse situationen i Mellemøsten og i Ukraine. Og jeg kan kun sige: Dette er en dag, hvor alle mennesker med

god vilje ikke kun kan være glade, men også jublende. Dette er et gennembrud for hele menneskeheden, og det er virkelig gode nyheder! Det er min indledende kommentar.

SCHLANGER: Paraden selv var for at fejre afslutningen for 80 år siden på kampene i Anden Verdenskrig i Asien. Altså, USA var allieret med Kina i denne krig, og der var invitationer til USA om at deltage i paraden. Har du nogen oplysninger om, hvorvidt der var officielle amerikanske repræsentanter i Beijing til paraden?

ZEPP-LAROUCHE: Det ved jeg ikke. Desværre tog præsident Trump ikke af sted, selvom vi førte en stor kampagne, hvor vi indsamlede underskrifter, der appellerede til ham og til præsident Xi Jinping om at invitere Trump, men han tog ikke af sted – ligesom han ikke tog til fejringen af afslutningen på Anden Verdenskrig i Moskva i maj.

Jeg synes, det ville have været fantastisk, hvis Trump var taget derhen. Han udsendte en erklæring på sin Truth Social-konto, hvor de første par linjer var ret forfærdelige, fordi de sagde, at i betragtning af at man havde præsident Xi Jinping med præsident Putin som æresgæst på den ene side og formand Kim Jong Un fra Nordkorea på den anden side, så var Trumps oprindelige indlæg, at disse tre konspirerer mod USA. Men når man læser hele teksten, udtrykte han faktisk meget gode ønsker og lykønskninger til Xi Jinping og også til Putin. Så jeg tror, det stadig er helt uafklaret, hvordan præsident Trump vil forholde sig til alt dette.

Og jeg må sige, at det er meget vigtigt, at russerne gør en meget klar indsats for at trække USA ind i denne udvikling: Der var en erklæring fra Kirill Dmitriev, der var med i delegationen på topmødet i Anchorage sammen med Trump, hvor han grundlæggende sagde, at de ønsker, at Rusland, Kina og USA samarbejder om at udvikle energi og andre ressourcer i Arktis. Og i betragtning af det enorme potentiale i udviklingen af Arktis, tror jeg, at dette er noget, der har meget gode chancer for at ske.

I dag starter også Vladivostok East Economic Summit, som jeg endnu ikke har nogen rapporter om, men mere end 6.000 virksomheder fra 35 eller flere lande vil være til stede, og jeg ved, at der vil være mange amerikanske delegationer. Jeg kan kun sige, at hvis USA reagerer positivt på dette tilbud om fælles udviklingsprojekter mellem USA, Kina og Rusland i Fjernøsten, vil det være det bedste grundlag for fred. Og det ville ganske enkelt betyde, at alle, der stadig tilhører »gårsdagen for altid«-fraktionen – og desværre må jeg henvise til en person i Tyskland, der helt klart tilhører den – ville indse, at de er fuldstændig isolerede og selvisolerede, hvis de ikke tilslutter sig det.

Jeg forventer, at der vil ske meget på mødet i Vladivostok, fordi dette er en slags naturlig opfølgning på mødet i Anchorage, og jeg synes, I alle bør følge med: For det, vi oplever lige nu, er fremkomsten af en ny æra for menneskeheden. Dette skaber muligheder for at løse alle problemer, herunder økonomiske problemer i USA og Europa, og det kræver, at mange mennesker hjælper til, for at det nye system kan blive en realitet, så det også påvirker de vestlige lande.

SCHLANGER: Helga, du nævnte den potentielle optimisme, der kommer fra dette, så hvis man har 20 eller 30 statschefer, der var til stede ved SCO-mødet, man har virksomheder fra hele verden i Vladivostok, og alligevel er mediedækningen i Vesten så storsnudet og nedværdigende, hvor for eksempel BBC og {Financial Times} siger, at militærparaden i Beijing er en »advarsel til Vesten«.” Altså, de siger dette på et tidspunkt, hvor lederne af de store europæiske lande løber rundt og hepper på en krigsoprustning mod Rusland. Ser de ikke ironien i dette, og tror de, at folk er for dumme til at forstå det?

ZEPP-LAROUCHE: Jeg tror ikke, det vil vare længe, for virkeligheden er, at denne nye globale majoritet går i en helt anden retning, fredelig, baseret på de fem principper for fredelig sameksistens og FN-pagten, udtrykkeligt ikke baseret på blokdannelse – de bygger ikke en modblok til Vesten, men de siger, at de er åbne for samarbejde med alle, der ønsker at slutte sig til dem.

Og i betragtning af, at denne models tiltrækningskraft naturligvis i høj grad hviler på Kinas fremgang, det faktum, at Kina nu de facto, i mange statistikker og også efter mine personlige observationer, er nummer et: For hvis man ser på den utrolige modernisering af alle aspekter, af byer, af infrastruktur, af gennembrud i lederskabet, af Kina inden for mange moderne, avancerede teknologier, har Kina naturligvis tilbudt den slags udvikling til alle lande, der deltager i Bælte- og Vej-Initiativet. Og det system har simpelthen vist sig at være mere attraktivt end de intervenerende krige, som NATO har ført! Hvis man sammenligner det momentum, der er på vej mod dette nye BRIKS, SCO, dette nye system, og sammenligner det med den elendighed, som de intervenerende krige i Afghanistan, Irak, Syrien, Libanon og Libyen har spredt, er det så åbenlyst, hvilken model der har vundet! Og det er en sandhed, som ikke kan undertrykkes.

Se på det faktum, at der takket være præsident Trumps indsats nu er en tilnærmelse mellem Indien og Kina; premierminister Modi var i Tianjin til SCO-mødet og havde meget gode drøftelser med Xi Jinping. Og de to ledere udtrykte vigtigheden af, at Kina og Indien arbejder sammen: Det var jo netop det, der ikke skulle ske! Og også præsident Putin og premierminister Modi var med – man kunne se dem i samtale, mens de holdt hinanden i hånden! Og de vestlige medier fik hyperventilationskriser, den ene efter den anden, og sagde: »De holdt hinanden i hånden!«

Nu finder jeg det hele meget morsomt og meget underholdende, og det er faktisk godt! Hvorfor skulle nogen med fornuft ikke være glad, hvis de to største lande på kloden – Kina og Indien – som tilsammen repræsenterer 35 % af verdens befolkning – bare to lande, 35 % af verdens befolkning – hvis de kommer godt ud af det med hinanden! Jeg mener, det burde være grund til glæde. Hvis man så tilføjer Rusland til den kombination, har man en ganske betydelig magt i form af militær styrke, økonomisk magt, befolkning og ressourcer. Så hvis disse lande tilbyder Vesten at samarbejde, tror jeg, at rygtet vil sprede sig. Og allerede har Slovakiets premierminister Robert Fico deltaget i paraden i Beijing, og han sagde, at europæerne er som tudsen, frøen, der sidder i bunden af brønden, og når de kigger op, kan de kun se lidt lys, men de kan ikke se, hvad der foregår. Og han sammenlignede europæerne med sådan en frø. Og det er præcis, hvad det er.

Og jeg vil ikke være overdrevent euforisk, men jeg er helt sikker på, at nyheden ikke kan undertrykkes. Og jeg hørte for første gang i morges på Deutschland Radio en ekspert, der er en berømt Kina-ekspert og så videre, og han sagde for første gang, at det, der sker med denne nye orden, er en realitet, som Vesten i sidste ende bliver nødt til at tilpasse sig. Og jeg tror, at det vil være den kommende vind, og så hvis den »for altid gårsdagen«-fraktion, som BBC, endnu ikke er med på vognen, er det synd for dem.

Resten følger på engelsk:

SCHLANGER: There’s a question from a former elected official from an Eastern European country, who’s been following what you’ve been writing and doing with your mobilization. And what she asked is: “What could you say to someone like Macron, if you have a chance to talk to him, about how silly it is that they’re operating from the standpoint that Putin is about to attack Europe? How could you convince someone like Macron that this is foolishness?”

ZEPP-LAROUCHE: I would tell Macron to listen to some of his own military, because many of the French military have stated—and including German military and other military like Italian military, that there is absolutely not motive for Russia to attack Europe. I have said this in the past, but Russia is a huge country, with 11 time zones. They have a population which is, really, a little bit small to occupy and secure such a huge territory. They have no motive; they have all the resources in their own country. What would be the reason why they would occupy countries in Europe, where they would have to assume that the population would be hostile to them, that all they would earn is run-down economies—it just does not make sense! They don’t have the military force to occupy more—you see how the argumentation of the West is not even logical. Because, on the one side, they say: “See, Russia is not capable of winning the war in Ukraine. It took them three years to just gain such a small part of Ukraine.” Now, why would you assume that Russia would have the forces to occupy more European countries, when the entire military expenditures of NATO are in an order of magnitude higher than that of Russia; when they don’t have the manpower to do so. And Putin, just the other day, stated again—just for the record—that Russia has no other objectives other than to defend its own interest, from a security standpoint.

And I think that is exactly what the situation is, and Macron probably should listen to the people who are competent military experts, and not go to Great Britain and listen to the Starmer and the British, because there, the advice will be a very bad one.

SCHLANGER: Now the other aspect of diplomatic activity is focussed on Southwest Asia, with the convening of the UN General Assembly in New York: There’s a motion to adopt a “Uniting for Peace resolution (377)” to end the fighting outside of the Security Council, to avoid the veto from the U.S. So, several people raised the question: “Does the UN actually have the power to stop Israel from committing genocide?” And related to that is the question: “Why would Trump meet with Tony Blair, given Blair’s record?”

ZEPP-LAROUCHE: Because he has a problematic son-in-law named Jared Kushner, who is of the same mindset as Blair. And that’s really the worst that could happen, and the reemerging of this absolutely disgusting and cynical “Riviera Gaza” plan, which is—it’s like adding the worst kind of insult to injury of a genocide going on now for almost two years. This is just totally disgusting! I think Blair, eventually these people should be put on trial for what they are doing, and not have the right to run around like that and propose such totally disgusting plans.

I think the Uniting for Peace resolution has a good chance to be adopted by the UN General Assembly. I think the only way how it could function is, the vast majority of all countries in the world is already absolutely disgusted with what has happened in Gaza. And if you had such a motion right now, where the UN General Assembly would adopt a combination of different measures: weapons embargo; trade cutoff; isolating any financial dealings with Israel; putting Blue Helmet troops in there; I think the combination of all of that would make clear to the population inside Israel, that Israel is completely isolated in the whole world, with very, very few pockets of exception. And I think that would tilt the situation, because Israel has to consider, if they surround themselves with countries and people who are their mortal enemies, it may last for months, it may even last for a year, but it puts into harsh question the existence of Israel by their own doing!

And on the other side, if there is a solution of what we are trying to do, to make the Uniting for Peace resolution not only a two-state solution; naturally, immediate humanitarian aid, without any hindering; but at the same time, developing the entire region: Not only the reconstruction of Gaza, but as part of the entire region, with the Oasis Plan: that is, the idea to create large amounts of new, fresh water to green the desserts, you could shift the whole situation.

Now, obviously, Blue Helmets cannot start fighting against the IDF, and they may not be able to stop the IDF this way, but I think one could create an international awareness of the situation there through such a motion. Because if 190 countries would all make clear that they completely disagree with what Israel is doing, and that would be on all the TV channels and all the news programs, I think you could change the situation.

SCHLANGER: There’s a question from a regular viewer from Canada, who said—and we can take this for her own view—but she says: “We don’t really have a deep state in Canada. We’re just a puppet of the City of London.” But she goes on to say: “I haven’t heard much from Gabbard recently. Is she still on the case? Is there still an investigation going on into the Russiagate?” because this is necessary if you’re going to outflank the pro-war faction in Washington.

ZEPP-LAROUCHE: Yes, she did some follow-up. I think there is a criminal investigation now on the basis of documents she released. I agree, one could hear more of it, but I think so far—or at least I don’t have any indication, that she is lessening her efforts.

SCHLANGER: And of course, we wrote a white paper, that goes through how the investigation should proceed beyond the obvious suspects, like Brennan and Clapper, and look at the British impetus for the Russiagate in the beginning. You can get that through The LaRouche Organization website.

Helga, there are two more questions. One is more philosophical, so I’ll save that, but there’s another on the economic crisis. Someone wrote in and said: “The LaRouche Organization is known for its economic analysis. What is your sense today: Do you really think that the tariff policy is going to bring in enough money to solve the deficit? Or is this just more politicking to try and stay in power and keep the money flowing to the banks?”

ZEPP-LAROUCHE: I think the tariff policy is a bomb, it’s a fuse, lighting the entire bankrupt financial system with $2 quadrillion in derivatives and debt, which is a bubble. And the tariffs could cause, in the short term, a whole series of bankruptcies, of involuntary insolvencies, and in combination with the crypto policy, I think President Trump is very ill-advised with this crypto currency. Because obviously, he’s concerned about the de-dollarization. But there is no bigger de-dollarization than the crypto! It’s the creation of a gigantic new liquidity bubble, obviously, in the hope to bail out the system this way.

But there is a very important new article by our EIR Editor for Latin America, and I could also say Economics, Dennis Small. It is a very important article which you should read: “How Should the BRICS Respond to Trump’s Crypto-Tariffs?” And I can say, they are actually doing it, to a very large extent, because they have now created the New Development Bank, which for the first time is issuing credit in non-dollar denominations, simply based on the national currencies of the participating countries. And that may actually become an anchor of safety, because the biggest Damocles’ Sword hanging over civilization is this bubble. And if it would come to an uncontrolled collapse, that could really blow the whole world into a catastrophe, including ending up in World War III. So, I think the measures which Dennis Small repeats, which are really the original ideas of Lyndon LaRouche and his Four Laws. That needs to be absolutely put on the agenda, so please look at this article.

SCHLANGER: Here’s the philosophical question, from someone who grew up in South Africa, and now lives in the Cameroons, and has been following us very closely. She said she has a question for you about how to achieve reconciliation. She said: “We’re finding it’s very difficult to get this concept accepted in South Africa, even with the examples set by Mandela. There’s just so much division and hatred, and no simple solutions. So here’s my question for you: Which comes first? Should you fight for the philosophical acceptance of the ideas about human beings, that are in your fundamental principles paper. Or, should you deliver the goods, first? That is, the economic benefits from cooperation? Or, can they be done together in this world?”

So there’s the question for you.

ZEPP-LAROUCHE: I think the key to this is the concept of peace through development. Obviously, if you have hard-core criminals, there needs to be a system of justice, where you need to punish those who committed these crimes. But I think the only model is really that you have to bridge conflict through development, and in the recent period, I think there was only one country which successfully approached crisis in this way, and that was China. They have been able to mediate the conflicts between the Sunnis and Shi’ites, or Saudi Arabi and Iran, archenemies for a very long time, that are now cooperating. The more recent example, is that through the idea of economic development, they were able to at least lessen the conflict between Pakistan and Afghanistan, through economic development, through the potential extension of the CPEC [China-Pakistan Economic Corridor] to Afghanistan and linking it up with the other Central Asian countries.

And whatever you do, there always has to be the perspective of joint development for the benefit of all participating countries and parties, because you have to change the environment. You have to have a perspective to the future. And while sometimes, you have to look at the past, you have to think what is the just battling of conflict, but if you only stay in the past, and you only say “You did this to me, and therefore, I did this to you. And this has to be balanced and we have to live with that,” there is no way out! You have to always have a perspective of future generations: You have to always start with how would you want to have humanity live in 100 years from now, or the next generation? Do you want them to have in a perpetual guilt, and punishment, and guilt and punishment…? I think we have to look at the one humanity. And the reason why I’m so really optimistic about what happened in Tianjin, in China, and the whole process going on with the BRICS and the SCO, and the emergence of this new era, is because, you have, for the first time, the idea of the shared humanity: This is a conception by Xi Jinping. He said, we have to have a shared community of the one humanity, or the one future of humanity.

And that is the mental jump we have to make. Because, if you start with the fact that we are one humankind, and that we have more in common, and more common interests, than what divides us—namely that we are the creative species, the only one known in the universe so far, and that we can relate to the creative identity of each other. And if we work on that, and actualize that creativity, we can produce anything! There is no limits in terms of what mankind can do, in terms of composition of music, poetry, economics, science, conquering space through space research and travel, thermonuclear fusion: There is no limit!

Just think that the present condition of mankind is the result of only a few thousand years, when we started to really get serious about development. Now, I hope that mankind will be around forever! We are the immortal species! And wouldn’t you think that when we perfect every science, that we improve medicine so that longevity becomes longer, that we will be healthy, getting much older, that we can study much longer, that we can devote our lives and efforts to improving, self-perfection, self-cultivation, aesthetic education. I think we are really only—maybe we are toddlers, or maybe we are still in the baby age—but we are far from being adult as a human species.

So, I think we have to start with a positive image, where mankind can go, and then try to sort out conflicts from that standpoint of the future, in the present. And therefore, I think that is also the approach one has to take to overcome all problems in the present, including things which were really very, very bad.

SCHLANGER: Well, you’ve certainly played a role in providing a perspective for the future, based on the work you did, first with your husband, and now since his passing, you’ve continued. And that’s reflected in the work of the International Peace Coalition, which will be meeting again this week. What can you tell us about the plans for this Friday’s meeting?

ZEPP-LAROUCHE: We will have several speakers, from Southwest Asia, because obviously the month of September will be the UN General Assembly, and we want to mobilize everything, every country, every force for the UN Resolution Uniting for Peace (377). So we will have several speakers there on that topic, from Israel, from Palestine, from the region. And, naturally, we will hopefully have some major Chinese speaker commenting on the result of the SCO and the present new situation. So you absolutely have to participate in it: Because the IPC meeting has become the place where every week, you find from top experts, from the relevant regions, what you will not hear from the radio or the TV of the mainstream media. So, please participate, and help us to make the IPC larger and larger, until we become the dominant force, fighting for peace.

SCHLANGER: And you can register for this week’s session at the Schiller Institute website, and it’s going to be at 11 a.m. Eastern Time on Friday.

Any final thoughts, Helga? I know this is quite an emotionally charged week, with these developments: How are you handling it?

ZEPP-LAROUCHE: I have been fighting for my whole life, or almost my whole life, but starting very young, for this to happen: A new world economic order which would allow every country on the planet to fulfill their potential. And I think we have made a major breakthrough. I think this is really a new era! It’s a break! Because it was building up as a potential for a very long time. But now it’s there, and it can only be increased. So, I think it’s something for people who have not been working on that for as long as I have and you have, Harley, I think it’s important to keep an open mind and make yourself familiar with it, and don’t go by prejudices you may have accumulated from whatever sources. Look at it! Because this is the ray of hope for all of humanity. And we have to make sure it reaches into Europe, and the United States, and that they participate.

SCHLANGER: We definitely need a ray of hope in Europe! OK, well, Helga, thanks for joining us today, and we’ll see you on Friday.

ZEPP-LAROUCHE: Yes, till Friday.

EU-landene uenige om skærpede sanktioner mod Israel under mødet i København

af Michelle Rasmussen, EIR
KØBENHAVN, 30. august 2025 (EIRNS) – I dag afholdt de 27 udenrigsministre i Den Europæiske Union et uformelt møde i København. I morges, før mødet, erklærede den danske statsminister Mette Frederiksen, at Danmark agter at bruge sit EU-formandskab til at samle støtte til at suspendere associeringsaftalen med Israel. I en kommentar til DR nyheder sagde hun:

– Den israelske regering lever ikke op til sit ansvar. Og vi må desværre konstatere, at vi ikke ser tegn på, at den israelske regering er klar til at ændre kurs. Kritikken er prellet af.

– Derfor må vi nu øge presset markant. Og forberede os på at straffe Israel økonomisk. Danmark stiller sig med EU-formandskabet i spidsen for at samle opbakning til at suspendere den del af EU’s associeringsaftale med Israel, der vedrører handel, indtil den israelske regering markant ændrer adfærd.

– Det er et alvorligt skridt at tage. Men situationen tilsiger det.

– Vi er bevidste om, at det kan blive svært at sikre den nødvendige opbakning. Men det afholder os ikke fra at gøre, hvad vi kan

Udenrigsminister Lars Løkke Rasmussen fordømte også Israel for at have forårsaget en humanitær katastrofe og opfordrede til hårdere foranstaltninger.

Det vigtigste budskab fra mødet er dog, at der ikke blev opnået enighed om at træffe sådanne foranstaltninger. EU-medlemslandene er splittede i dette spørgsmål, hvor blandt andet Spanien, Danmark, Holland, Sverige og Irland opfordrer til hårdere foranstaltninger, mens Tyskland, Østrig, Ungarn og Italien ifølge DR Nyheder blokerer for dette. Den tyske udenrigsminister Johann Wadephul sagde i et interview med DR, at Tyskland af historiske årsager ikke ville være det første, men snarere det sidste land, der ville give sit samtykke.

Det eneste, de 27 udenrigsministre blev enige om, var at protestere mod USA’s intention om ikke at give visum til Den Palæstinensiske Myndighed (Palestinians Authority) til at deltage i FN’s Generalforsamling i New York City.

Den danske udenrigsminister søger at suspendere EU’s handelsaftale med Israel

KØBENHAVN, 31. august 2025 (EIRNS) – Forud for det uformelle møde mellem de 27 EU-udenrigsministre i København den 30. august talte den danske udenrigsminister Lars Løkke Rasmussen til journalisterne om at være vidne til “en humanitær katastrofe af helt vilde dimensioner. Det skal stoppe. Vi har talt lidt til [Israels] døve ører, og derfor er tiden kommet til, at vi nu sætte handling bag,” herunder at sanktionere ministre, der støtter ulovlige bosættelser, Horizon-delen af handelsaftalen mellem EU og Israel, og nu at suspendere aftalen som helhed. Han opfordrede også til at genåbne den medicinske korridor fra Gaza til Østjerusalem for at behandle hårdt sårede patienter der.

Under pressekonferencen efter mødet talte Lars Løkke om “den humanitære katastrofe i Gaza. Den daglige grusomme vold fortsætter, og så sent som i sidste uge erklærede FN hungersnød i Gaza. Israels handlinger går langt ud over selvforsvar, og vi har gentagne gange opfordret Israel til at stoppe krigen og ændre kurs. I dag har jeg opfordret EU-medlemslandene til at øge presset på Israel for at ændre kurs, og jeg tror, at vi alle deler bekymringen over den humanitære situation, og at vi alle ønsker, at krigen i Gaza slutter, og at gidslerne bliver frigivet. Som en måde at øge presset støtter Danmark

suspensionen af handelskapitlet i associeringsaftalen med Israel. Vi vil fortsætte med at arbejde for at sikre den nødvendige støtte blandt EU-landene til at gøre dette… Vi må omsætte ord til handling.”

Men som rapporteret i går var medlemslandene uenige om dette forslag og andre foranstaltninger for at lægge pres på Israel. Under spørgetiden spurgte det tyske nyhedsmedie Deutsche Welle om, hvordan man skulle reagere på beskyldningen om, at foranstaltninger mod Israel vil hjælpe Hamas. Lars Løkke sagde, at hvis vi lægger pres på Israel, styrker vi ikke Hamas. Israel underminerer to-statsløsningen. Tværtimod, hvis vi ikke handler, øger vi de ekstremistiske elementer på begge sider.

Der var en pro-palæstinensisk demonstration uden for mødestedet, og ministeren udtrykte i et interview, at han deler deres frustration.

Video interview med Lars Løkke inden mødet her her.

Videoen med Lars Løkke under pressekonferencen efter mødet er her.

Af Michelle Rasmussen, EIR

KØBENHAVN, 30. august 2025 (EIRNS) – Da den spanske udenrigsminister José Manuel Albares Bueno i dag ankom til EU’s udenrigsministres uformelle møde i København, sagde han til journalisterne:

Spanien har foreslået en handlingsplan for Gaza og Palæstina. EU gør for lidt og for sent, gør intet, opnår ingenting. Så tiden for erklæringer er forbi. Vi må bevæge os fremad. …

For det første skal vi indføre en våbenembargo på salg af våben fra EU.

For det andet skal vi udvide listen over personer, der er underlagt sanktioner, til at omfatte alle der ønsker at ødelægge to-statsløsningen, som er den eneste løsning, der kan bringe fred til Mellemøsten.

For det tredje skal vi yde meget omfattende økonomisk støtte til Den Palæstinensiske Myndighed (Palestinian Authority), som har haft det svært, fordi Israel tilbageholder de skatter, der skulle gå til denne myndighed.

Og for det fjerde skal vi håndhæve og overholde alle afgørelser og alle rådgivende udtalelser fra Den Internationale Domstol, f.eks. ved at standse al handel med produkter fra de ulovlige bosættelser.

Og på grundlag af artikel 2 i associeringsaftalen (Council of Association) mellem EU og Israel foreslår vi en fuldstændig suspension af denne aftale mellem EU og Israel.

“Vi kan ikke fortsætte som normalt, når vi ser denne utrolige og forfærdelige humanitære situation i Gaza, hvor tusinder af palæstinensere står over for at dø af sult, af en hungersnød, som Israel har fremprovokeret. Og vi taler om børn, om babyer. Det er uacceptabelt. EU kan kun forholde sig til Israel gennem menneskerettigheder, og hvis der er tale om en massiv krænkelse, som Kommissionens rapport klart har tilkendegivet, må vi handle. Det er ikke tid til ord. Det er tid til handling, handling for at stoppe krigen, handling for at bryde Israels blokade af Gaza, og derfor har Spanien foreslået en handlingsplan med tiltag, der i øvrigt ikke er noget ekstraordinært. Det handler blot om at opfylde og overholde vores egen lovgivning eller europæisk lovgivning, det er alt.

Udenrigsminister Albares talte derefter om den øgede støtte til anerkendelse af en palæstinensisk stat, som Spanien har ført an i EU, og kritiserede tilbageholdelsen af visa til Den Palæstinensiske Myndighed, så den kan deltage i FN’s Generalforsamling i New York, hvilket han sagde burde være et klart budskab fra dagens møde.

Videoen kan ses her. 

Billede: Audiovisual Service – Informal meeting of Foreign Affairs Ministers (GYMNICH) in Copenhagen, Denmark

På engelsk:

International Peace Coalition Meeting #117, Friday, August 29, 2025

ANASTASIA BATTLE: Hello, everyone; welcome! This is the International Peace Coalition. This is our 117th consecutive meeting. Thank you all for participating in this process. My name is Anastasia Battle, and I’ll be your moderator along with Dennis Small and Dennis Speed, my co-moderators. I like to remind everyone at the start of each meeting that we created this forum in order to bring the entire world peace movement together around a consolidated idea to create true peace. Whatever philosophy you’re from, whatever nation you’re from, language you speak, religion, it doesn’t matter; if you are for true peace, then you are welcome here.

We have an excellent line-up of people today going through the world situation, which has been quite tumultuous. So, please take a moment to share this invitation with your friends, your organizations, reasonable enemies if you have some, to invite them to this discussion today. It will be very important. Coming up we have the September 3rd event and SCO meeting; but I’ll leave that to our next speaker to update everyone.

So, I’d like to have Helga Zepp-LaRouche, the founder of the Schiller Institute and the initiator of the International Peace Coalition to start us off. Please go ahead, Helga.

HELGA ZEPP-LAROUCHE: Hello to all of you. It is very difficult to determine where one should start, because the strategic situation is so full of dangerous spots which could go out of control, and the whole dynamic in general is not going in a positive direction at all.

But let me start with the most pressing issue, because time is running out in Gaza and the West Bank, where the genocide is continuing. Every single day people are dying; famine is there. The offensive against Gaza City by the IDF has started, and the international community is so far absolutely impotent and doesn’t act. We are coming up now to the UN General Assembly, and that creates probably the last chance to do something to stop this. The military operation against the occupied Palestinians—it’s not a war where Israel has declared war on the Palestinians. Israel is the occupying force in a very small contained area called Gaza. It is unbelievable! I think we should be aware of the fact that if the whole world community is proving unable to stop a genocide which is going on in front of the eyes of the entire world community, that is not only potentially meaning the deaths of more than 2 million Palestinians. I think it is the end of civilization, if you can call it civilization after this. So, it’s the last chance. On the 18th of September—this is in the middle of the UN General Assembly—the deadline runs out for a provision which was concluded and agreed upon one year ago by the UN General Assembly that Israel has to comply with the rulings of the International Court of Justice or further measures can be adopted by the UN General Assembly. That creates a window, because obviously Israel has not been compliant; nobody has been putting pressure on it. The United States has been backing whatever Israel is doing; Western governments have done absolutely nothing substantial to intervene. That means that the only remedy left is to go to the 1950 Uniting for Peace Resolution #377, which says that if the UN Security Council is blocked by, for example, the permanent veto of one of the Permanent Five, then the decision-making can go to the UN General Assembly, which can then decide to adopt measures. What would be required would be a resolution in the UN General Assembly which specifies which measures must be taken, including sending forces—either Blue Helmets or some other military force. That depends naturally on the discussion in the UN General Assembly. Then, by a two-thirds majority, they can decide to send such a force.

There are all kinds of proposals which are side traps and actually not functioning to remedy the situation, such as a two-state solution [which the Schiller Institute otherwise supports- editor]; because this does not change the genocide. UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese has pointed that out. There is now growing resistance mounting; for example, there is a letter signed by more than 200 former EU diplomats and other such people demanding action. Also, the staff of Volker Türk, the UN Special Rapporteur for Human Rights, are demanding that he take action. So, I would suggest that we discuss this, and that we deploy the International Peace Coalition to support such an action of the UN General Assembly uniting for a peace resolution to go into effect.

As I said, this is probably the last chance there is; because if we wait any longer, the majority of people in Palestine will be dead or simply transported to a small area in the south somewhere, amounting to a concentration camp, and maybe shipped out. Ethnic cleansing is on the agenda. So, that’s my first point. One should take note of the fact that of all people, Tony Blair and Jared Kushner were in a meeting at the White House discussing some proposals for Gaza. That clearly smells of the Gaza Riviera proposal.

If that genocide would not be enough—and let me just restate it again for emphasis. If the world community fails to act on that, I think we are losing everything. We are not just threatening to lose the Palestinian people; we are losing the ability to look into the mirror every morning. We are losing the idea that there is something like international law. It’s really a massive issue which is at stake.

As if this would not be enough, I think the situation that we discussed last week with the IPC meeting where Prof. Postol was putting out this extreme warning that in his view—and he is the expert—and he has reiterated that he has the absolute knowledge and evidence. There is no doubt about what he is saying. He said basically that Iran has enough nuclear material ready so that either they already have nuclear weapons, or they could have them in a few weeks or days. So, he said that we have two undeclared nuclear powers in the Middle East. To make things worse, the European Three—that is Great Britain, France, and Germany—have now activated something which is called the Snapback, which refers to reinstituting the sanction regime which was abandoned after the JCPOA was affected. Now basically they are giving Iran a 30-day deadline to again allow the International Atomic Energy Agency in for inspections to find out where their remaining nuclear material is. Obviously, the answer from the Iranian government has been negative; they say they have no reason to believe that there is any legitimacy in the request, because the last time they cooperated, they were cheated. The United States was negotiating while preparing to back up the Israeli military attack. So they say they have absolutely no reason to believe any of the statements being made are true.

The Russian government in the person of Dmitry Polyanskiy has denounced this method of what he calls coercion and blackmail by the Europeans. Basically the Iranians also say that they have no capability, because who wants to listen to these Europeans when they have not been able to intervene with the U.S. attack in the first place? Polyanskiy says there are two ways of dealing with issues; one is diplomacy, and the other is coercion, blackmail, and threats. That is obviously what the Europeans are now doing. There is also a study out which says that the sanctions regime has caused more than 500,000 civilians to die because what do these sanctions aim at? They hit the civilian population; they lower the living standard, make everything more expensive; and people die from hunger and lack of medicine. So, that is a ticking time bomb, because the 30-day deadline means that the situation is on absolute fire.

Just to mention one more item which I think is important, there was just the arrest of the so-called coordinator of the Nord Stream sabotage in Italy. A Ukrainian man, who supposedly was the commander of the operation whereby the 50-meter sailing yacht was the tool with which the sabotage was carried out. The German authorities say that all seven who participated in this have now been identified. One man died on the battlefield in Ukraine; the other five are known, at least their identities are known. That story I think is extremely doubtful. There are many experts around the world in many countries who absolutely doubt that this very sophisticated operation could have been carried out from a small sailboat with practically amateur divers. It’s completely ludicrous, and Russia, China, and other countries have demanded an independent investigation to establish complete transparency as to what happened. This is not just a terrorist attack. Remember, the Nord Stream sabotage changed the geopolitical landscape, because it not only started the present economic downfall of Germany and all of Europe which is now going at high speed, but it was the beginning of completely geopolitically separating Europe from Russia. That obviously was to the total benefit of the United States during the Biden administration, because now Germany and other Europeans are buying LNG gas from the United States at prices three to four times higher than the cheap gas from Russia. That was the beginning of the collapse of the German economy. I can only tell you, France is bankrupt. On September 8th, there will be a vote of no-confidence of Prime Minister Bayrou. In all likelihood, he will lose the vote. Then there will be a new prime minister which is very unlikely that an agreement can be found. Therefore, the National Assembly will be dissolved, and there will be parliamentary elections or Macron will resign and then Presidential elections will take place. In any case, there is no stable government, and the French economy is in freefall; as is even more dramatically the German economy. There you have bankruptcies, insolvencies, rising unemployment. I can only see that in the next several weeks and months into the fall and winter, we will have a complete collapse of Germany and the European economies. That is the result and late consequence of the sabotage of Nord Stream 2; and therefore we absolutely have to demand that the demand from Russia in particular, but also China which has made the point that if that state terrorism is not investigated, no critical infrastructure at no place in the whole world is secure. So, an independent real investigation is absolutely required.

Now, the ongoing militarization of Europe, and unfortunately of Germany in particular, is also going full speed ahead. The so-called Coalition of the Willing do not give up their intention to keep the war going in Ukraine; which has clearly been lost on the battlefield. Nevertheless, there are ominous developments going on. The latest of which is that there was a meeting of the German Cabinet in the Defense Ministry in a room which is called the Submarine Room, because it is completely isolated. You cannot eavesdrop on that room; it’s protected against surveillance. So, why do they meet there? Well, the Supreme Allied Commander of NATO, General Grynkewich, was there, and it’s only my guess what they may have been discussing. But when these meetings are taking place, one should be extremely alarmed because of the ongoing armament and operational Plan Germany, whereby the Army is going to the schools trying to recruit pupils to join the Army. There is a general narrative that there will be an attack by Russia on a European country by 2029 at the latest, which is being repeated by all these mainstream media on a daily basis. So, this is the situation.

Now fortunately, there is something else going on entirely concerning the Global Majority. Tomorrow starts the Shanghai Cooperation Organization meeting in Tianjin in China, where Prime Minister Modi will probably meet with Xi Jinping on the sidelines. President Putin is the guest of honor. 34 leaders of other countries will participate. Maybe President Trump will not go there, which we had tried to evoke with our appeal. It does not seem that he will go there, but maybe he has deserved the Nobel Peace Prize because he got India and China much closer together, and that can only serve peace, so that’s a good thing.

But jokes aside, I think at this event of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, they will present their ten-year strategic plan. You should be very interested to hear that, because I am sure there will be a lot of economic and other integration of Eurasia around that. Then, on the 3rd of September, you will have on the one side the military parade in Beijing, commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of the Second World War in the Pacific. That will be a super important event as well. And I’m sorry, Putin will be the guest of honor at that; I mixed it up before. That will be a very important demonstration. And on the same day, September 3rd, the Vladivostok Eastern Economic Forum will also start. One of the main topics is the development of the Arctic. More than 6000 firms will be there; many countries of the Global South will see their chance to invest together with Russia and others to develop the kinds of raw materials which they are in need of. If the German leadership were still in the realm of sanity, they would say, “Let’s cooperate with Russia,” because Germany has no raw materials, and we need to develop such secure raw materials in cooperation with Russia and the BRICS. I’m not sure that such sane statements are possible, at least at this moment. This will hopefully be a place where the continuation of the potential of building the Bering Strait between Alaska and Eurasia will also be on the table. At least, we will try everything we can to make sure that it’s being discussed, because that would be a core piece of our World LandBridge proposal as the economic basis for a lasting peace in a new security and development architecture which must take into account the interests of every single country on the planet.

So, that is what my short introduction in the beginning is. As you can see, the dangers are extremely severe and acute. On the other side, a way out is already visible; namely for the Western countries to simply join the Global Majority. Then everything would be very easy to be solved. That’s my initial report.

{{Remarks during the Discussion:}}

[In answer to Prof. Toloraya:] I would like to answer that briefly. I think you need a little bit more differentiated analysis, because the Golden Billion [Western population] is not a homogeneous group. The governments which are the war mongers right now in the Coalition of the Willing have very thin support. Macron’s government will not be there next week. Starmer has maybe one-digit support in the British population. Merz has at best 29%, and the CSU-CDU 24%. So that is not exactly a majority. The reality is that because of the dramatic collapse, the vast majority of people will absolutely lose everything. Merz just said that the present German economy cannot maintain the social welfare state. That means they will go for massive cuts which will ruin the livelihoods of many people. That’s why I’m saying that if there would be a clear offer coming from the Global Majority of cooperation, like joint ventures in the development of Africa, joint ventures in the development of the Far East whereby it is becoming clear to the majority of the people of Europe that there is another way. Because people don’t want to go to war; it’s just that when they only hear the mainstream media, then they are despairing. I can tell you, people in Germany and France are getting quite desperate; in the United States they’re getting quite desperate. So, I think it does require a little bit more intervention. Because the elites are like you say—Merz was the CEO of BlackRock in Germany for many years, and he obviously has more the interests of the military-industrial complex in mind than the OCs[ph] were to defend the common good of the people. But I think that there is much more room for intervention which is what we should concentrate on.

[Response to Graham Fuller and Ray McGovern:] I have a better part of me which is an optimist, and in that sense I agree with you, Ray, that if you look at the long arc of history, it bends towards progress and justice. So, I’m absolutely certain that if we get out of this present crisis, there will be a beautiful future for humanity; because I think man is capable of reason. If you think about all the incredibly beautiful things mankind has already produced, all the pieces of art in China, in India, in Persia, in Europe, there is something about human beings which I think is making them capable of facing every challenge.

Having said that, I however think that we are in the short-term in an extremely dangerous situation, because this idea that the Russians are now saying that the Fourth Reich is reappearing in Germany and Europe is extremely worrisome. Anybody who considers what happened in World War II should really have sleepless nights over that. I was talking with a contact earlier today, and I said, “I’m a political battle horse; I have been in politics now for a very long time. But still I cannot understand what is driving these people to for no good reason risk the existence of our country.” Then this person said, “Well, maybe it is that these people are bought. That they have some advantage from what they do, and that weighs more than their consideration of the country in the long term.” I don’t know. What does it help you if you get riches if everything is being destroyed in the end? I think there are many Russians who even wrote books that said if Germany continued on its present course, it will be wiped out. Germany is the one country which is most in danger if it comes to war of being completely wiped out. Already in the past in all nuclear maneuvers of NATO, the existence of Germany does play a consideration at all. People who participated in NATO maneuvers know that, and they have been reporting that.

So, therefore I welcome what both Prof. Toloraya and Graham and Ray are saying. You have to shout loudly into Germany, because I think especially Russians and Americans and people from the outside have to make themselves heard so that maybe some of these Germans who are sleepwalking right now will wake up. So, thank you.

[In answer to comment re West not wanting to relinquish control, etc.] I just want to say connecting both what Pamina said and what Elsa now said. I’m following world developments every day; and I take into account what’s going on in the Global South, in Africa, in Latin America, in Russia, China, India. I can only tell you, please do not concentrate on the way the world looks from inside Germany. Because I can tell you that this is a completely distorted view. If you are only listening to German media, you get depressed. I can only warn you that the whole country becomes depressed because you think that you are surrounded by enemies. There is no positive development occurring anymore; there will be cuts occurring in all social fields; the hospitals get closed; the schools don’t function; the Russians are evil, the Chinese as well. You go crazy! I make it a question of my mental health to not think about Germany first thing in the morning, because I would go crazy, too. That is why I want to encourage people like you from India, to speak out. Maybe Putin doesn’t want to address these demonstrations; maybe you should. Because I think the most important thing right now is to hear voices from the outside. The Global Majority is the Global Majority. Even the British think thanks admit that the Global Majority is 85% of the world population, and it is rising.

Look at India. India has right now in my view a very beautiful revival of its Non-Aligned tradition. The more Trump is pushing India, the more that Non-Aligned tradition comes out and becomes active. India has I think 6.5% growth. India will soon be the largest country in the world, bypassing the number of people living in China. So, it’s 1.4 billion-plus people; together with China, it’s 3 billion people. Two countries, 3 billion people! What are the 80 million Germans as compared to that? So, I think we have to really readjust the way people look at the world. The more we get the cross-national border dialogue going, and people speak with each other, I think there is an absolute possibility that people will recognize we are sitting in one boat. Either we join our efforts and work together, or we all are destroying each other. So, I think we have reached that point in human history.

I have said this in the past, but let me repeat it. In the past, when the Roman Empire collapsed, in India there was the Gupta Period, and it took years before people even realized that the Roman Empire had collapsed because you had to travel by ship, and it would take very long. You would get sick, you would die, and before you could return. In other words there was no handy [cell phone], there was no internet. You could have parts of the world collapsing and other parts rising. If you look at the last several thousand years, it was always like that; the torch of progress would go from one culture to the next. It was shifting. This is now different; this time we are all sitting in one boat. If there is a nuclear exchange anywhere, it is my firm belief that it will lead to such a disaster that the chances that we all may not make it are very high.

That is what we have to start with, because once you realize that we have to change because if we get into a war right now, there will be no winner—nobody. There will not even be an historian to investigate what went wrong. If you don’t start with that, you are not realistic. But if you start with that, and say we must have a dialogue of cultures, and we will recognize how beautiful this world is, you have a completely different approach. I think that is what we have to strengthen.

[In response to collapse of German economy] Briefly, I think that there will be a huge reaction. I just read earlier today that the Verdi[ph] trade union will start demonstrations against the cuts. I’m absolutely certain that that will grow, because the dismantling of the welfare state in Germany is so dramatic. They’re cutting hospitals everywhere. They now have training sessions where the nurses and doctors are advised that in the coming war with Russia, they will have to treat wounded NATO soldiers first before ordinary people who have illnesses. This is just crazy! I personally think we are going to have a very hot autumn. Whatever the temperature in the winter will be, it will be a hot winter as well. This cannot function! You cannot do what they are trying to do. The Bundeswehr is a joke! They dismantled the Bundeswehr for so long, and now they want to basically fill it up with money. They will try; they will try very hard to militarize all of Europe. But I think the economic bottom will fall out before they succeed.

So, I think we are going into a very stormy period. I think it will require a lot of people with cool heads, and providing solutions. I think chaos is a big danger, because we may have an uncontrolled collapse. The United States is bankrupt; the U.S. debt issue is becoming a big topic. France is bankrupt. I think the reason why these elites are so unnerved is because they know perfectly well that we are sitting on an unsustainable system, and you could have an uncontrolled collapse which will make 2007-8 look like peanuts. The countries of the BRICS are trying to create a different mechanism for credit creation. Putin was talking about a new industrial platform as a financing mechanism. I think the West should start thinking about how we fix this bankrupt system. My late husband, Lyndon LaRouche, has provided the Four Laws of Lyndon LaRouche, which are still absolutely valid. The first is generalized Glass-Steagall; tell the investment banks to take care of themselves, they will no longer get taxpayer money. Put the commercial banks under state protection, because they are the institutions which have to provide credit for the productive parts of society. Create a national bank in every country, and then create a New Bretton Woods system with heavy emphasis on providing lots of opportunities to the Global South for credit generation to overcome their under-development. Then, focus on scientific and technological breakthroughs in fusion technology; because this will mean a gigantic jump in the productivity of the economy. Then, go for international cooperation in space research and travel, and similar things to get the necessary increase in productivity like what China is doing. China does a lot of things correctly, and India is not very far behind. Other parts of the world are much smarter than the Europeans at this point. So, let’s learn from them.

   {{Closing Remarks:}}

I just want to say a word about this Reagan question. The one thing which sticks out in my mind is President Reagan’s positive response to my late husband Lyndon LaRouche and the whole SDI question. You should go and look at the video of the TV appearance President Reagan made on March 23, 1983, when he offered collaboration to the Soviet Union to jointly make nuclear weapons obsolete. That was a very serious idea which my last husband was elaborating in a protocol for the superpowers, which was a whole plan for how to make nuclear weapons obsolete. The only way to do it, was that the two superpowers would jointly develop new technologies based on new physical principles and then jointly deploy these systems. I think that is still a very valid conception, although it may have changed in terms of the predicates. I think the Russians have in part acted on their own on that basis with hypersonic weapons and similar things. But I think Reagan reiterated that same proposal eight months later in an open letter to the Soviet Union. So, if you are an historian, or interested in getting the historic record straight, go to these sources. Go to the {EIR} archive and you will find the relevant leads to find these things.

I think this was very important, and to do Reagan justice, I agree with you, Graham, that he should be upheld for that reason. He is, of all the conservatives for sure, the most reasonable one, and deserves to be upheld.

Otherwise, I can only repeat what the course of the discussion was. We will go into dramatic changes in the next weeks. The SCO meeting I think will have a clear perspective for the next ten years. Then you will have the two events on September 3rd in Beijing and Vladivostok. Then in the following weeks, there will be the UN General Assembly. So, a lot of things will happen in that period, and I think this is the period to try to inject this idea of a new security and development architecture. Because one of the things which is wrong with the European approach at this point is that they are talking a lot about providing security guarantees for Ukraine. But what about security guarantees for Russia? The Helsinki Accord concluded with one very important idea, and that was the concept of indivisible security: That you cannot have security for one and not for the other. The Europeans [internet freeze] …

I was just talking about the concept of indivisible security. I think that requires some discussion, because one way of countering this Russo-phobia question is, is there a legitimacy of having security guarantees for every country involved? The reason why the Versailles Treaty was really the first step toward World War II was because it did not take into account the security interests of everybody. I think that lesson needs to be learned. If you want to have a new world war, then you deny that. So, I think more discussion about that is required.

Otherwise, I can only appeal to you to become active with us, because we need to build the International Peace Coalition to be an absolutely strong voice. If you are from countries which are not yet that represented, please bring all your friends and colleagues to the next session. We definitely should internationalize the IPC much more than we are doing already. So, please get active with us.

KØBENHAVN, 25. august 2025 (EIRNS) – Under det danske tv-program, DR2’s meget sete aftennyhedsinterviewprogram »Deadline« den 21. august, der fandt sted efter den israelske regering havde meddelt sin intention om at overtage Gaza City, fordømte den tidligere israelske premierminister Ehud Olmert planen, fortsættelsen af krigen og Netanyahu-regeringen. Se programmet her.

Han havde støttet krigens begyndelse som en reaktion på angrebene den 7. oktober 2023, men sagde, at tingene har ændret sig.

»Alle tidligere kommandører i den israelske hær, højtstående generaler, chefen for Mossad og sikkerhedstjenesterne i Israel er enige om, at der i dag ikke er noget mål, der er værd at fortsætte krigen for, måske miste gidslerne, dræbe mange israelske soldater unødigt og dræbe mange palæstinensere, der ikke er involveret i terror. Under sådanne omstændigheder er der ikke noget grundlag for at fortsætte krigen, og det er opfattelsen hos mere end 70 % af israelerne….«

»Hvis denne plan [om at overtage Gaza City] betyder deportation af hundredtusinder af indbyggere i Gaza, er det fuldstændig ubærligt og uacceptabelt…. Det vil være tvungen deportation, og i så fald kan det ikke fortolkes på anden måde end som etnisk udrensning. Jeg håber, at det ikke vil finde sted.«

Om Stor Israel-fraktionen sagde han, at »Gaza aldrig har været historisk forbundet med det jødiske folk….« Der var israelske bosættelser, men de blev nedlagt. Han fordømte ministrene Ben-Gvir og Smotrich og de “messianske gruppers'” fantasier og drømme. »Disse drømme er en overhængende og umiddelbar fare for velfærden, fremtiden, sikkerheden og stabiliteten samt status for Staten Israel. Og jeg håber, at vi vil have tilstrækkelig magt inden for Staten Israel til at forhindre det.« Han opfordrer til at vælte Netanyahu-regeringen, og til at det internationale samfund skelner mellem regeringen og det israelske folk.

»Deadline« interviewede derefter en Mellemøsten-ekspert fra Forsvarsakademiet, der også kraftigt fordømte den nuværende israelske politik.

I andre udviklinger fandt den største pro-palæstinensiske demonstration siden krigens begyndelse sted i København i går med muligvis 70.000 mennesker (ifølge en deltagende Schiller Instituttet-arrangør), organiseret af 100 humanitære organisationer, fagforeninger og andre. Den prominente dækning af FN-rapporten om hungersnøden i Gaza øgede deltagelsen.

I dag udsendte tretten humanitære organisationer en appel til den danske regering, der nu har EU-formandskabet, om at stoppe våbeneksporten til Israel, annullere EU’s handelsaftale med Israel, støtte retssagerne om folkedrab og bruge EU-formandskabet til at lægge pres på Israel.

Den 15. august sagde den danske statsminister Mette Frederiksen i et interview med Jyllands-Posten efter bekendtgørelsen af offensiven i Gaza City, at »Netanyahu er et problem i sig selv nu«, og at Israel ville være bedre stillet uden ham, hvilket skabte overskrifter i Israel. På trods af dette nægter den danske regering stadig at anerkende Palæstina som selvstændig nation med den undskyldning, at det ikke vil hjælpe de sultende palæstinensere nu.

Desuden var Danmarks overrabbiner, Jair Melchior, en af 80 internationale ortodokse rabbinere, der underskrev en erklæring, der kritiserede Israel for at tilbageholde humanitær hjælp i Gaza og for vold på Vestbredden.

by Dennis Speed (EIRNS) — Aug. 29, 2025

På engelsk.
Should President Donald Trump journey to Beijing, on the occasion of China’s Sept. 3 80th anniversary commemoration of the worldwide Victory Against Fascism? Many, including Schiller Institute Founder Helga Zepp-LaRouche, have called for him to do so. It is fitting and proper to do so, in that the September 3 ceremony, as stated by the Chinese Foreign Ministry, “also symbolizes the unity and determination of the two countries to defend the outcome of the victory in World War II.”

American President Franklin Roosevelt’s idea of the world that must emerge from the ashes of the Second World War became, through the force of his intervention, the dominant policy-outlook in the world in 1945. FDR proposed in late 1941 a template for post-war world security, a council for which Russia and China were permanent members. They were to be two (in addition to Great Britain and the United States)of what FDR would call the “Four Policemen,” a phrase he coined in 1942, for a first approximation of what would ultimately become the United Nations Security Council.

FDR would not have allowed the United States to be the sole dissenting voice in the recent UN Security Council vote, pertaining to Gaza. The United States refused to endorse the statement, “The use of starvation as a weapon of war is clearly prohibited under international humanitarian law. Famine in Gaza must be stopped immediately.” The forced starvation violates two of FDR’s Four Freedoms: Freedom From Want, and Freedom From Fear, and he would have never allowed the United States to do that.

In the next days, a combination of meetings, starting with the August 31-September 1 Shanghai Cooperation Organization, followed by Beijing Sept 3, followed by the Vladivostok Eastern Economic Forum Sept. 3-6, represent an extraordinary opportunity for a dialogue of civilizations. 70 nations will attend the Vladivostok meeting alone. These are nations that are already assembled, prepared, and positioned to discuss, in general outline form, a new security and development architecture, including with the Presidency of the United States. Many projects are already underway among these nations. A post-August 15 overture from the White House, of the “Good Neighbor” form that FDR projected so well on the world stage, would be an anomalous, unexpected, welcome shift, especially away from the tariff wars.

As with the meeting that Trump held with President Vladimir Putin August 15, there are things of great moment, and that will determine the fate of the human race, that can only be handled through face to face deliberations, of what might be called a “dialectical nature.” “Dialectical” refers here to what Plato expressed as the method of the Socratic pursuit of truth, portrayed in each of his famous dialogues, and not what German philosopher G.W.F. Hegel spoke about as “the dialectical method,” a term bandied about today by Frankfurt school escapees like Palantir’s Alex Karp, or the neo-Marxists. It is a process of dialogue that forces a change of axioms through a “coincidence of opposites.” In this way, we are able to arrive at a higher idea, giving us the capacity, as individuals, or a society, not only “to see ourselves as others see us,” but to see the seed-crystal of the future in the present and to thereby act, including with our “opposites,” in such a way as to make that future a reality.

As an example, take the morally horrific situation regarding Gaza, with its now-undeniable forced starvation of scores of thousands of children. There is nonetheless, something transformative happening, unexpected by the criminal perpetrators, presently erupting in Israel itself. There, since Sunday, there have been two large street demonstrations. The one that occurred Sunday reportedly had 500,000 people. The one on Tuesday had about 300,000.

The population of Israel is approximately 10 million people. Compared to the United States’ 340 million people, an American demonstration, to be the same proportionate size as that which just occurred in Israel last Sunday, would require 17.5million people. An appeal was made, not to Netanyahu, but to President Donald Trump, to put an end to the killing.

The population in both Gaza and in Israel, are in upheaval. People, there and elsewhere, because they are human, sense that a higher conception of humanity is required, or Israel will cease to exist—not because it is bombed out of existence, but because it becomes morally unfit to sustain itself. Our Ten Principles for A New Security And Development Architecture contains that higher conception of humanity that must be the starting point for the end of war. Nations of the world are conveying in Beijing to reaffirm the resolve to uphold what FDR and they achieved 80 years ago, in founding the United Nations. Will the President of the United States miss the opportunity of the next seven days, or seize it?